Tuesday, 13 October

22:49

Dirk Eddelbuettel: RQuantLib 0.4.29 on CRAN: New QuantLib, Plus Small Fixes [Planet Debian]

A new release 0.4.29 of RQuantLib arrived on CRAN this evening, had already been built for r2u as well as on r-universe and has just been uploaded to Debian.

QuantLib is a rather comprehensice free/open-source library for quantitative finance. RQuantLib connects (some parts of) it to the R environment and language, and has been part of CRAN for twenty-three years (!!) as it was one of the first packages I uploaded to CRAN.

This release of RQuantLib brings two new calendars (Malaysia, Philippines), updates to a number of other calendars as well to other files, and two deprecations we are reflecting in this release. It also benefits from a number of careful and attentive pull requests by Maximilian Muecke cleaning up an (astonishing !!) number of likely rather old little bugs. Full details from the NEWS file follow as usual.

Changes in RQuantLib version 0.4.29 (2026-10-13)

  • Configure check for outdated QuantLib version updated,

  • Adjust two instantiations on macOS x86_64 with old compilers

  • Correct Euribor2W and Euribor3W tenors setters (Maximilian Muecke in #196)

  • Accect Euribor1W as alias for EuriborSW tenor (Maximilian Muecke in #197)

  • Correct default handling of the payFixed parameter (Maximilian Muecke in #198)

  • Assign missing S3 class to American option implied volatitly return (Maximilian Muecke in #199)

  • Correct spelling in manual pages and R code (Maximilian Muecke in #202, #203)

  • Support additional Polish settlements (Maximilian Muecke in #204)

  • Check for curve parameters in FittedBondCurve (Dirk in #205 fixing #201)

  • Reflect two deprecations in QuantLib 1.44 and adjust code in two spot (Dirk in #206)

Courtesy of my CRANberries, there is also a diffstat report for the this release. As always, more detailed information is on the RQuantLib page. Questions, comments etc should go to the rquantlib-devel mailing list. Issue tickets can be filed at the GitHub repo.

This post by Dirk Eddelbuettel originated on his Thinking inside the box blog. If you like this or other open-source work I do, you can now sponsor me at GitHub.

20:42

GameHole Con and On! [Dork Tower]

GAMEHOLE CON!

It’s GameHole Con week, and if you’re in the Madison area, this is what my schedule will be like:

THURSDAY OCT. 15

  • 1 PM – CARTOONISTS ON GAMES AND GAMERS (seminar) 1 hour, with Stan! Brown and James Lowder. “Gaming Comics” are their own sub-genre these days. Stan! Brown and John Kovalic have spent decades making light of games, gamers, and themselves, and are ready to spill the beans on the humorous side of the hobby!
  • 2 PM JOHN KOVALIC SIGNING in the Dorkstock Area
  • 3 PM – JOHN KOVALIC’S EUROGAMES (boardgames) 2 hours –  In CASH ’N GUNS, an abandoned warehouse houses the gangsters splitting up loot…it’s time to let the guns do the talking. GRAIL CUP is a hilarious hidden role game, reminiscent of Citadels, as your knights bluff their way to victory (and avoid the dragon).
  • 9 PM – DUNGEON CRAWLER CARL (spectator/streaming) 2 hours – Dungeon Crawler Carl RPG Actual Play with Dan Taylor, LaTia Jacquise, and Elisa Teague. A live, actual-play Dungeon Crawler Carl Roleplaying Game show, presented by Catacombs & Comedians. The players on stage are a group of hopeful meat-based lifeforms making objectively poor decisions as they navigate traps, monsters, and a rules system specifically designed to test friendships, morals, and one’s ability not to scream under pressure. They were selected because they are professionals at handling silence, bombing gracefully, and masking panic with humor. None of those skills will help them here.

FRIDAY OCT. 16

  • 2 PM – PLAYTEST TIME WITH JOHN KOVALIC (party games) 2 hours – ONE of these days John will publish SOME of these party games, but for now, he’s simply having a blast playing them at cons with a select few!
  • 3 PM JOHN KOVALIC SIGNING in the DorkStock area
  • 5 PM – 30 YEARS OF DORK TOWER AND 25 YEARS OF MUNCHKIN(seminar) 1 hour, with Steve Jackson. John Kovalic, creator of the Dork Tower comic and illustrator of over 8,000 Munchkin cards, and Steve Jackson, founder of Steve Jackson games, the publisher os Munchkin, discuss the intertwined history of both fan-favorites in conversation with Dan Taylor (Catacombs and Comedians).
  • 6 PM – YOU ART NOT ALONE: ADVICE ON CREATING YOUR CREATIVE LIVE, THERAPY FOR THOSE ALREADY LIVING IT(seminar) 1 hour – with Shanna Germaine, Ronin Wong and Teos Abadia. As a creator, how do we balance the demands of our career with everything else in our lives? How can we be our best healthy selves, enjoy the process of creating, and feel good about our future goals and past accomplishments?
  • 9 PM – THAT OTHER STARSHIP (spectator/streaming) 2 hours Star Trek Adventures Actual Play, with Dan Taylor, Sarah Babe and Bryan CP Steele. That Other Starship offers a hilarious look at what happens after Captain Kirk and the Enterprise depart on their next mission, leaving a mess for the Sancho’s crew to mop up. It’s the Lower Decks of The Original Series.

SATURDAY OCT. 17

  • Noon-ish –  There will be CAKE, to celebrate the start of DORK TOWER’S 30th year running!
  • 4 PM – JOHN KOVALIC SIGNING in the DorkStock area
  • 6 PM – SHADOWDORK (roleplaying) 2 hours Join Igor, Carson, Gilly, Stell, Matt and Ken in the lands of DORK TOWER’S Warhamster in a one-off RPG dm’ed by John Kovalic. Will the lands of Aurora ever be the same? Dragons don’t slay themselves, you know!
  • 9 PM – THE GOOD, THE BAD AND THE ELDRITCH(spectator/streaming) Call of Cthulhu Actual Play, with Dan Taylor, Sarah Babe, Matt Forbeck and Elisa Teague. The Good, the Bad & the Eldritch is a live Call of Cthulhu actual-play comedy packed with cowboys, cultists, questionable decisions, unspeakable horrors, and whatever other trouble the investigators manage to stir up along the way. Expect eldritch terror, Old West mayhem, and the kind of unpredictable chaos that only happens when dice, players, and ancient unknowable forces are all working against each other.

SUNDAY OCT. 18

I will be away from the show, for my kid’s birthday.

Hope to see you at the show!

  • John

18:56

18:35

[$] KDE Linux at two [LWN.net]

KDE Linux, the KDE Project's second stab at creating its own distribution, was first introduced as "Project Banana" at the Akademy conference in 2024 by Harald Sitter. Nate Graham announced the first alpha-quality release during Akademy 2025. Graham and Sitter paired up at Akademy 2026 to provide an update on its progress, lay out plans for refining the distribution to address user feedback, and discuss some of the problems that still need to be dealt with. KDE Linux is still not-quite-ready for prime time, but Graham hopes that it will be suitable for widespread use soon—for an undefined value of "soon".

17:49

Nix and Lix local root-privilege-escalation vulnerabilities [LWN.net]

The Lix and Nix projects have jointly disclosed a set of vulnerabilities that can be used to escalate privileges to root on systems running the Lix or Nix daemons. "All systems that build untrusted derivations are affected." Releases with fixes from each project are available today. CVE IDs have not yet been requested. See the announcement for more details on the vulnerabilities.

17:28

The Big Idea: Madame McCoy [Whatever]

Who needs modern dating gameshows when you could be a lowly peasant girl enrolled in looking for love at the behest of your king? Author Madame McCoy is here today with her debut novel, Henriette, which is only book one in her brand new series, The King’s Daughters.

MADAME McCOY:

Whatever readers! Shamelessly, Madame has induced Monsieur Scalzi to bend a Big Idea guideline! Madame is an independent author. Now, Madame’s alter ego, Nancy Werlin, is a traditionally published writer who has appeared in these pages before, but then—

Madame sidelined Nancy with a deft elbow jab! Resistance was futile! Madame spends her writing days snickering. Madame speaks of herself in the third person. 

Madame is having so much fun! 

Madame is writing a historical romance series set in 17th century Québec, and it’s a bit smutty. She’s been at it for a year and three books are done. She is here to tell you about the first, Henriette, which is just out. (The next two will publish in November and December; six more will follow.) 

It’s 1663. Louis XIV is twenty-two, king for twenty years so far but only recently out from under the thumbs of his mama and Cardinal Mazarin. Meanwhile the French colony in Québec is dying. It’s the Little Ice Age and too damn cold—men go, make some money in the fur trade, and return home to France. Who can blame them? 

Louis’ solution: Bribe orphaned and poor girls to volunteer to go, with dowries, trousseaus, their passage paid for, and even land grants. But the real bribe was giving them POWER over their futures. 

The women were asked to choose husbands from the many (oh soooo many) (Madame fans herself) available male options. Or, if they didn’t like anyone, they could pick up and go back to France, and some did. Some took years to find the man they wanted. Many others made a choice quickly (and here you thought speed dating was a new thing). Collectively, the women became known as the filles du roi, or daughters of the king. 

This really happened, mes amis. Over ten years, 800 women went. The scheme worked; families formed and put down roots and to this day, the majority of French Canadians descend from one or more of these intrepid women. Because of strict parish records, the lineage is unambiguous. Madame herself has met someone who counts eleven in her ancestry. 

In Book One of Madame’s series—real history, imagined love stories—eight women band together as found family in their tiny shipboard cabin. One of them, Henriette, gets up a flirtation with the ship’s captain that turns, hm, hot. But he’s not marriage material. Or is he? 

The series follows Henriette and her friends as they hunt husbands, and find—forge—love. 

Husband-hunting is a much honored theme in historical romance. But make no mistake: This is not high society Regency England. Madame’s heroines are mostly lower-class; in some cases, illiterate. Madame’s heroes make a living with their own hands; nobody is going to receive an inheritance or a dukedom. 

To please herself, as well, Madame throws in genre mashups (if you were a 17th century werewolf, wouldn’t you prefer Newfoundland to France?). And each book ends with Madame’s idiosyncratic Notes. Madame finds the research to be delightful and wishes to share the very best bits: about Louis XIV, about colonization (Madame cannot ignore the devastation), about the fashion for wigs and from whence it came, about the job of the cabin boy, about the social importance of a woman’s kerchief… 

In short, Madame is running wild and free, defying even the conventions of romance publishing. As for Nancy, she is holding onto her hat, which is a fetching turquoise cloche.

And now … a more sober word from Nancy. (Madame constrains Nancy to a single paragraph.)

Nancy Werlin: Where did this idea really begin? For years, I watched my idol Lois McMaster Bujold indie-publish her Penric series. I thought: Surely she of all people could publish them traditionally? Surely this was a choice? But why? Simultaneously, I was feeling more and more troubled as the traditional publishing environment turned toxic for many writers. Personally, I’d had a good run over decades. Edgar Award. New York Times bestseller. National Book Award semifinalist. But I saw the storm clouds, and then I felt them. Trying to solve it for myself, I disentangled from Big Five—getting rights-reversion on those books as fast as I could along the way—and moved to an employee-owned boutique publisher. Then my new publisher was bought by private equity. All along, though, I’d kept watching Lois McMaster Bujold; kept thinking about her choices; kept considering how mine ought to change now. So when I visited Québec City, fell in love with the story of the filles du roi, remembered that I’d been a lifelong reader of romance, and that as Nancy, I was already a flagrant genre-hopping hussy—

Madame swept in and took over. 

(Just curious, for writers and readers both: From your point of view, have you noticed the strangeness in publishing these days? What are your thoughts? You can comment here of course, or also just contact Madame at madame@madamemccoy.com – Nancy and Madame both are very interested in your observations.) 


The King’s Daughters: Amazon|Barnes & Noble|Bookshop

Author socials: Substack|Madame’s Website|Nancy’s Website

17:00

Link [Scripting News]

firstSentence, a JavaScript function that returns the first sentence in a string. Useful in coming up with something to display for an untitled post. It's always been a klooge, but this time with Claude's help we're using a new API in JavaScript, and supposedly it really works. I'm using it in one of my apps, and you might find it useful too, and let me know if it works for you.

The web of hairballs [Scripting News]

The browser and the web it defines is a hairball in a hairball in a hairball in a hairball in a hairball.

The hairballs are named Chrome, Firefox, MSIE, Netscape, Mosaic.

Each in turn has had their way with the web.

The stack of hair defines a "web" that is far far away from the web we started with.

It was going pretty good for a while, if you could live with the all the modal popovers and paywalls, but now the current owners are excluding old sites, and imho when you do that, it's not the web any longer.

Dead Streaming – DORK TOWER 13.10.2026 [Dork Tower]

Most DORK TOWER strips are now available as signed, high-quality prints, from just $25!  CLICK HERE to find out more!

HEY! Want to help keep DORK TOWER going? Then consider joining the DORK TOWER Patreon and ENLIST IN THE ARMY OF DORKNESS TODAY!

16:35

15:49

C++ futures part 2: The mental model for std::promise, std::packaged_task [The Old New Thing]

Last time, we looked at the “state” that powers the std::promise, std::packaged_task, std::async, std::future, and std::sharedfuture classes. Now we’ll see how that “state” (which I call the source) gets used and passed around.

The lifetime of the source is managed by a std::shared_ptr<source<T>>. Everybody who has a reference to the source uses this shared pointer.

The simplest case is std::promise. The operations on std::promise pretty much map directly to the operations on the source we laid out last time.

The next more complicated case is the std::packaged_task. This takes a callable and saves it for later. You can then call get_future to get a future and hand it to somebody as an IOU for “A value will appear here someday.”

When you want to produce a value, you invoke the packaged_task with whatever parameters you want to pass to the original callable. The result of the invocation (either a value or an exception) is then stored in the source object, which can then be retrieved by the future.

You can imagine a packaged task as just wrapping a promise:

template<typename R, typename... Args>
class packaged_task
{
    std::promise<R> p;
    std::function<R(Args...)> func;

public:
    template<typename F>
    packaged_task(F&& f) : func(std::forward<F>(f)) {}

    auto get_future() { return p.get_future(); }

    void operator()(Args... args) {
        try {
            p.set_value(func(args...));
        } catch (...) {
            promise.set_exception(std::current_exception());
        }
    }
};

When you invoke it, it calls the stored callable with the arguments and puts the result in the promise.

Okay, those were the easy cases of pushing values into the source. Next time, we’ll look at the messy case: std::async.

The post C++ futures part 2: The mental model for <CODE>std::promise</CODE>, <CODE>std::packaged_task</CODE> appeared first on The Old New Thing.

Steinar H. Gunderson: Decompilation patterns, part 10: return var_v0 [Planet Debian]

The v0 register on MIPS is special in that it is the return register (like rax is on x86-64), so when you see code like this:

if (x == 3) {
    var_v0 = 1;
} else if (y == 4) {
    ...
    var_v0 = 3;
}
var_v0 = 5;
return var_v0;

then you have to consider the possibility that the intended match is:

if (x == 3) {
    return 1;
} else if (y == 4) {
    ...
    return 3;
} else {
    return 5;
}

Whether you put the last return in an else block or not is irrelevant for the match, of course, it's purely a matter of taste.

14:49

[$] Owning C types from Rust code [LWN.net]

Rust's system of ownership and borrowed references is convenient when it can correctly model a program's needs. The Rust for Linux project has worked to provide adapters between Rust's semantics and the existing C code in the kernel. At Kangrejos 2026, Andreas Hindborg spoke about a patch series implementing the next such adaptor: an Ownable trait for representing objects that are allocated in C code, but which Rust code is responsible for cleaning up (if not necessarily deallocating) when it is done with them. He hoped to finally reach a consensus on the patch series, after months of discussion on the mailing list.

Eisentraut: The reverts will continue until morale improves [LWN.net]

PostgreSQL core team member Peter Eisentraut has written a blog post reflecting on the "unusually high number of features" that have been taken out of the upcoming PostgreSQL 19 release since the beta period began.

Some of the reverted features had significant architectural defects that would have been hard to fix quickly and during beta. But there was also a long tail of relatively harmless issues involving various edge cases. In past times, many of these would not have surfaced until much later and we would have fixed them bit by bit over the subsequent five years. But with LLM-assisted code review, these kinds of things can get found much faster, and then you're staring at a list of like forty defect reports. And even if each of them requires only a three-line fix on average, there is a fixed overhead to dealing with each of these, and then you run out of time. Most if not all of the affected reverted features were written a long time ago when LLM-assisted code review was not as useful as it is now, meaning that the effective quality bar has been raised after the time the feature was written and committed. Unless the capabilities of LLM-assisted code review keep improving at the current rate, this situation should sort itself out for future development cycles.

A corollary of that is that, at least for the most part, as far as I can tell, this situation is not due to "vibe coding". This code was written well before that was a possibility.

LWN covered the unusually large number of bug fixes required for PostgreSQL 19 features in September.

Security updates for Tuesday [LWN.net]

Security updates have been issued by AlmaLinux (cjose, curl, emacs, environment-modules, flatpak, flatpak-builder, gd, glibc, kernel, libxml2, pcre2, and rsyslog), Debian (chromium, keystone, libgit2, librsvg, nagios4, and ntfs-3g), Fedora (baresip, bcm283x-firmware, curl, flare-im, GitPython, iperf3, kernel, libebml, libmatroska, libre, mkvtoolnix, python-mkdocs-rss-plugin, radicale, uboot-tools, and xiphos), Mageia (antlr4-project, cjose, cups, firefox, nss, golang, libextractor, nginx, ntfs-3g, openvpn, perl-DBI, perl-Imager, polkit, rsync, strongswan, thunderbird, tor, ugrep, vlc, and wireshark), Oracle (bind, bind9.16, cjose, compat-openssl10, compat-openssl11, curl, dovecot, emacs, flatpak, jackson-core, jackson-databind, jackson-jaxrs-providers, and jackson-modules-base, kernel, mod_auth_openidc, nodejs:22, tftp, and thunderbird), SUSE (bind, gcc13, gcc48, ghostscript, go1.26, go1.27, helm, libpng16, librsvg, libsoup, libX11, libXi, python, python-anyio, python-Django, python-PyJWT, python-tornado6, python-urllib3, python310, python313-bugzilla, python313-cmarkgfm, python313-colander, python313-configobj, python313-confluent-kafka, python313-django-registration, python313-ecdsa, python313-httptools, python313-imagecodecs, python313-impacket, terraform-provider-aws, terraform-provider-azurerm, terraform-provider-external, terraform-provider-google, terraform-provider-helm, terraform-provider-kubernetes, terraform-provid, thunderbird, unbound, virtiofsd, and xorg-x11-server), and Ubuntu (ffmpeg, google-guest-agent, google-osconfig-agent, and libx11).

14:42

Link [Scripting News]

I'm a recent convert to new versions of the MacOS, last version I was using was High Sierra. In this version, Tahoe, it's entirely too easy to make a window go full screen with no obvious keystroke to undo the mistake. I learned if you move the mouse up to the top of the screen you get the menubar, but unfortunately there is no obvious command in the menu for undoing the mistake. I still don't know which gesture does this. And btw, the longtime Mac bug where some keystroke moves the dock to another window, that's still here. I can tell as I'm clicking the mouse, too late to stop, that this is one of those times. I've memorized a finger macro to get it back, but it used to piss me off a lot, but now it's kind of a gentle reassurance that someone is remembering how we got here.

14:07

Asterinas 0.19.0 released [LWN.net]

Asterinas is a project to build a new operating-system kernel in Rust; it was covered here in 2025. Version 0.19.0 of the Asterinas kernel has been released; changes include a new graphics subsystem capable of running X.org, "minimal but usable" 64-bit Arm support, better virtualization support, and more.

13:56

When Architecture Decisions Actually Apply [Radar]

In my previous Radar article, “Architectural Guardrails for AI-Generated Code,” I argued that AI coding agents need a layer that can hold architectural decisions in a structured corpus, retrieve the relevant ones, put them into the agent’s context before it writes code, and enforce explicit constraints with reproducible checks. Testing that model exposed two distinctions I had compressed together.

  1. Retrieving a decision because it is relevant doesn’t mean the decision applies to the artifact being changed.
  2. A decision that does apply isn’t automatically suitable for deterministic enforcement.

The first distinction is between relevance and authority; the second is between guidance and enforcement.

Here’s the story of how one controlled repository made this distinction clear. The project used local JSON-backed persistence for its current phase, and an active architecture decision ruled out PostgreSQL, ORMs, and database migrations for the command-line application. The task asked the coding agent to change that application’s storage module, so the decision was not merely related to persistence in general; it had authority over the part of the repository being changed. The record was retrieved successfully and placed in the agent’s context before work began.

The agent still proposed PostgreSQL, together with an ORM and a migration path. Under my original four-capability model, that looked at first like a retrieval failure. It wasn’t. The decision was found and was current, and it arrived at the right moment. What was missing was an applicability signal that told the system that this decision governed the storage module being edited rather than serving as one more relevant document for the model to weigh against nearby code and other context.

Retrieval finds; applicability governs

Retrieval helps us determine which architectural decisions might be relevant to a task. That’s a search problem, and teams have increasingly capable ways to solve it: indexed repositories, connected documentation, exposed decision records and service catalogs, semantic search, and project memory. These techniques help an agent see useful material before it writes code. They don’t, by themselves, answer a different question: Which of those decisions has authority over the change in front of the agent?

Suppose a repository contains two persistence decisions. One requires PostgreSQL for an analytics service; the other requires local file storage for a command-line tool. If the agent is editing the command-line tool’s storage module, both decisions may rank highly for a query about persistence, but only the local-storage decision applies to that artifact. Determining which decision governs the change requires scope, lifecycle, precedence, and a clear record of which decisions replace earlier ones. I argued for precedence and lifecycle in the previous article; scope deserves equal attention because scope is what tells the system where a decision has authority.

A related problem is that architectural information is usually scattered across several kinds of documents. Humans know that an old design note, a README, an accepted architecture decision record, and a current platform standard don’t necessarily carry the same authority, even when all four discuss the same topic. Models don’t know that unless the system preserves the distinction. When those sources are flattened into one context window, the hierarchy among them can disappear. I think of this as authority flattening: Information remains available, but the signal about which information is binding becomes weaker. That’s useful when a design question is genuinely open; it’s risky when the team has already answered the question.

Research on architectural decision violations points to a similar boundary. A 2026 study by Su and colleagues examined 980 ADRs across 109 open source repositories. The models were strong when decisions were explicit and inferable from code but less accurate when compliance depended on deployment configuration or organizational knowledge. The study evaluated violations after code was written rather than guidance before generation, but the underlying limitation is similar: A model can retrieve the right document and still make the wrong architectural choice when applicability or authority remains implicit.

What scope changed

I tested this distinction in a small controlled experiment using seven coding tasks, repeated under two conditions with the same coding agent and model configuration. In one condition the agent worked without the relevant architectural guidance; in the other, architectural decisions were supplied before it began changing code. Independent reviewers assessed the first attempts for both architectural compliance and whether the requested work was actually completed. The guidance changed behavior: First-attempt compliance on the architecture-sensitive tasks improved from 6 of 15 runs to 10 of 15, while successful task completion was essentially unchanged.

The more interesting result was a failure inside the guided condition. In several authentication tasks, the agent received a storage-related architectural decision that was genuinely relevant to the surrounding problem and then implemented additional persistence work that the task had never asked for. Nothing was wrong with the decision, and retrieval had done its job. Relevance had simply been presented without enough information about authority. The experiment made two limits explicit: A decision can be relevant without governing the artifact being changed, and even a governing decision doesn’t authorize the agent to widen the task. Applicability tells the system where a decision may constrain work; it isn’t permission to invent more work.

Blocking is easier than guiding

The second distinction forced me to revise another part of the original model. The previous article emphasized deterministic enforcement: when a team has made an explicit decision and a violation can be identified from observable evidence, a blocking verdict should come from a reproducible rule rather than a model’s judgment. I still think that’s the right standard for blocking. The important qualification is that only a subset of architectural decisions can meet it without pretending that judgment has become deterministic.

“Do not introduce SQLAlchemy into this component” is comparatively easy to express as a rule, easy to check, and easy to block. “Use the existing persistence abstraction correctly” is different. Most of its meaning is architectural rather than syntactic: The right implementation depends on which abstraction is intended, how it’s used in this part of the system, and what surrounding constraints are already in force. The first statement describes a prohibition that can plausibly become a deterministic control. The second describes a sanctioned path and is better treated as guidance unless the team can make the relevant evidence and boundary precise.

Earlier experiments with pregeneration guidance pointed in the same direction. Adding more architecture-related context didn’t reliably improve behavior because what was missing was often not another prohibition; it was a clearer description of the accepted implementation path. A guardrail layer built entirely around blocking will become very good at saying no. Useful architectural governance has to do both jobs: block the known violations when the evidence is precise enough and carry positive architectural direction for the much larger set of decisions that still require interpretation.

When judgment becomes authority

This doesn’t reduce the role of models; it puts probabilistic reasoning where it’s useful. Models are good at interpretation: reading ambiguous guidance, surfacing decisions that might bear on a change, explaining the consequences of a boundary violation, and proposing how to bring a change back into line with the intended design. Deterministic logic is better suited to decisions the team has already settled and can state in terms that a check can reproduce. The mistake is asking either mechanism to do both jobs.

Once a system says that a proposed change violates an architectural rule, the standard changes. An engineer should be able to ask which decision applied, why it applied to this part of the codebase, what evidence triggered the result, and whether another developer running the same check would get the same answer. That doesn’t require every part of architecture to become formal policy. It requires a clear boundary around where uncertainty is allowed: Models may help find and explain architectural context, but a blocking decision shouldn’t ultimately reduce to “the model thought this looked wrong.”

Humans routinely work with architectural ambiguity. We weigh incomplete evidence, local context, and competing trade-offs, often using heuristics rather than formal rules. Models can help with that interpretive work too, but the result remains probabilistic. The problem begins when an ambiguous judgment is treated as a blocking rule. Deterministic enforcement requires a boundary precise enough that the same evidence produces the same verdict.

The distinction matters even more when a team uses several coding tools at once. One developer may use Claude Code, another Codex, another Cursor, while automated agents perform background maintenance. The models and retrieval mechanisms can differ, but the team’s architecture shouldn’t change with the tool. A shared set of decisions can sit underneath those environments as the source of authority, while each tool consumes guidance in its own way and the enforceable subset is checked consistently.

What I would add to the original model

I would now amend the original four-capability model in two places.

Retrieval should surface candidate decisions, while applicability determines which of those decisions actually govern the current artifact or action, using scope together with lifecycle and precedence. Then guidance and enforcement should remain separate outcomes: Some applicable decisions are precise enough to support deterministic controls, while others should influence the implementation without becoming binary rules.

That separation leaves the agent free to reason where the architecture is genuinely open while preserving authority where the team has already made a decision. It also avoids a common overcorrection. Once teams see that some architecture can be enforced automatically, the temptation is to formalize everything. A great deal of architecture is still judgment. “Keep domain boundaries narrow” or “prefer asynchronous integration when immediate consistency is unnecessary” can be valuable guidance without being safe material for an automatic block. The level of authority a system exercises should follow the precision of the decision and the evidence available to evaluate it.

For years architectural governance ran largely on human process: Someone wrote the decision record, an architect reviewed the important changes, experienced engineers carried part of the history in their heads, and code review caught some of what slipped through. AI coding agents change the economics of that process because implementation can now move faster than architectural intent can be reexplained and rereviewed by hand. Giving agents more context is necessary, but it’s not sufficient. The harder job is preserving the difference between information that may be useful, a decision that actually applies, guidance that should shape an implementation, and a constraint that is precise enough to stop one.

The goal isn’t to constrain every choice an agent makes. It’s to stop decisions the team has already made from quietly turning back into suggestions. That requires more than retrieving the right document. The system has to know whether the decision is current, where it has authority, and what kind of authority the team intended it to have.

23 years of Child's Play! [Penny Arcade]

We are just about one month out from the 2026 Child’s Play charity dinner and auction! On November 13th we will once again be getting together to raise money for the cause we started all the way back in 2003! 

 

 

Man-Made Horrors, Part Three [Penny Arcade]

I mean, I'm a sucker for it too, and I came of age when that's just what teevee looked like. My youngest craves horror, horror of all kinds, but if she sees the tracking go off on a pretend VCR she recoils as though from a serpent.

Man-Made Horrors, Part Three [Penny Arcade]

New Comic: Man-Made Horrors, Part Three

Man-Made Horrors, Part Two [Penny Arcade]

There's nothing I love more than a wiggling rune, God damn. As soon as I know there's gonna be a rune I stand up a little straighter, maybe groom my eyebrows real quick. I'm always trying to work one into the strip and this time I managed to accomplish it in the most meta way possible. It's powerful stuff.

Man-Made Horrors, Part Two [Penny Arcade]

New Comic: Man-Made Horrors, Part Two

Man-Made Horrors, Part One [Penny Arcade]

I ate some food court Chinese and now, by every observable metric, the food court Chinese is eating me. I was able to play a couple rounds of Blood on the Clocktower last night before I began to get a wobbly feeling I described as "nautical" and I have spent the last ten hours or so in a state similar to a furniture warehouse whose boss is out of town, i.e., "Everything Must Go."

Man-Made Horrors, Part One [Penny Arcade]

New Comic: Man-Made Horrors, Part One

Limited-Time Offer [Penny Arcade]

My brand has long been "Atheist Jerk-off," but wtf I love Catholicism now.

 

Limited-Time Offer [Penny Arcade]

New Comic: Limited-Time Offer

World of Warcraft Never [Penny Arcade]

After Wednesday's Wattersonian horseshit, we're back to what we do best: animal cruelty.

World of Warcraft Never [Penny Arcade]

New Comic: World of Warcraft Never

The Race Galactic [Penny Arcade]

There was a period of time where they were just putting Star Wars on shit. Games Workshop used to do that too, with their license. There was some filth. But they've both figured out that - and I'll agree it's a little crazy - if you give the licenses to cool people who make good games it's a better play. In the same way that ex-Firaxis people proved that Star Wars XCOM could be much more than the sum of its parts, ex-Criterion people are making some kind of Goddamn roguelite racing game and it looks fucking sick.

The Race Galactic [Penny Arcade]

New Comic: The Race Galactic

Numbers Game [Penny Arcade]

He's still being dragged down into an incredibly deep hole with the new Fire Emblem, enough to wonder how some of the math could possibly math in this way. He sounds like me when I got heavily - heavily - into Dynasty Tactics, which I was horrified to learn is twenty-four years old. Fire Emblem is about type-matching and abilities, which is already drugs; Dynasty Tactics is largely about creating a favorable battlefield by positioning your units so that, like striking a match, you attack once and it triggers additional attacks from the rest of your army. I don't know that I've ever had to think that hard in a game since. They made a second one, but I didn't like it as well. That could be due to the fact that it wasn't as good, maybe, but who knows. It's also possible that the exertions of arranging and then triggering ten discrete units on a two-dimensional plane so that they all perform in a harmonious sequence is only something you can feel once.

Numbers Game [Penny Arcade]

New Comic: Numbers Game

My B-Day! [Penny Arcade]

Thanks for the Birthday wishes guys I appreciate it! Gabe’s Birthday being a worldwide phenomenon is one of my favorite running gags in the strip. 

 

 

Goerbemisdag [Penny Arcade]

Strips about "The Christmas In September" go back, yea, unto the site's very founding. This was during a time where "sites" were a thing, luckily we came to our right minds and converted the frontier into a series of corporate intranets. Dodged a bullet, there. But! There are several more strips in that vein, and there are two strips in particular that have the visual cues to help you understand the rich lore he has been embroidering the holiday with. I should tell you that he and I never once discussed a single stitch of this stuff. I'll just get a strip outta nowhere and he's got a fez and there's a fish for some reason.

Goerbemisdag [Penny Arcade]

New Comic: Goerbemisdag

The Euphemism Treadmill [Penny Arcade]

One of the weirder things about algorithmic media is that I will receive apology videos from people I've never even heard of simply because it's media that has been engaged with beyond a certain threshold. It's a genre; they seem real sad. I thought Bungie's new video was going to be another entry in this Al-Qaeda Hostage genre, but at least I know what this one is about. Bungie's corporate leadership sold them up the river, made impossible promises, and then actual human beings had to try to spin that candy floss into real products, all while getting chopped up like a boosted Audi. A lot of people mourned Destiny, as they were essentially told to by the company itself. But now it's back! Kinda. Maybe?

The Euphemism Treadmill [Penny Arcade]

New Comic: The Euphemism Treadmill

13:21

Pluralistic: Bundestrojaner (13 Oct 2026) [Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow]

->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->-> Top Sources: None -->

Today's links

  • Bundestrojaner: You can't make people more secure by making them less secure.
  • Hey look at this: Delights to delectate.
  • Object permanence: 9/11 sitcom; Jon Norman v Philcon; Bruce Sterling's post-9/11 geopolitics; Polaroid bankrupt; David Mamet x Shel Silverstein; "Great Big Beautiful Tomorrow"; Canadian government calls abortion doctors "terrorists"; Shanghai Ikea kicks out lonely, loitering seniors; Black Panther self-care.
  • Upcoming appearances: Paris, Vancouver, Victoria, Ottawa, Vienna, Kilkenny, Oxford, Sheffield, Oxford, Montreal.
  • Recent appearances: Where I've been.
  • Latest books: You keep readin' em, I'll keep writin' 'em.
  • Upcoming books: Like I said, I'll keep writin' 'em.
  • Colophon: All the rest.



A moody, silhouetted Trojan horse, with a glowing horse skeleton partially visible inside it. It is acrawl with 1950s pulp robots. It stands in a psychedelic mist, through which peek vivid, brightly colored flowers.

Bundestrojaner (permalink)

Every morning, I revisit my blog headlines from this date, going back 25 years, 20 years, 15 years, 10 years, 5 years, and one year. I publish the most interesting ones in a section of my newsletter that I call "object permanence," and I think it's the most useful part of my day.

"Object permanence," of course, is a reference to the stage in an infant's development when they acquire the ability to connect events in the past to events in the present, which is why it's the point at which babies cease to be amazed by peek-a-boo. I've been blogging for more than a quarter century, and these daily trawls through the things I considered important enough to share are an unexpectedly powerful way to connect the events of the past to the events of the present.

Take cybersecurity, subject that is filling today's headlines, primarily due to a spate of poorly understood (and criminally poorly explained) incidents in which AI companies' hacking tools broke into various servers on the internet, sometimes trashing them:

https://pluralistic.net/2026/09/12/god-in-the-box/#llms-are-fake

In my discussions of this subject, I've been at pains to tease apart two different aspects of these incidents: first, that it's wrong to speak of bots "going rogue" here (they're doing what they're designed to do); but second, that the alarming thing about these incidents is that they illustrate how deeply unserious our approach to information security has been, and remains.

This is important context, and context is what gives us the object permanence we need to both understand and address real problems, like the two related facts that a) our IT systems are poorly constructed and indifferently maintained; and b) the people who are supposed to be fixing this keep making it worse.

The worst culprits here are governments, though the private sector is also terrible (in truth, our cybersecurity nightmare is something of a private-public partnership from hell). Governments are deeply compromised when it comes to digital security because they have an irreconcilable conflict of interest: on the one hand, they want to defend their countries' administrative systems, firms and households from digital attacks. But on the other hand, they really want to be able to launch attacks on their adversaries, both foreign and domestic.

Worse: because governments don't know who those adversaries might be (or might become at some later date), the state security apparatuses of the world's governments keep insisting that all working computer security must be dismantled, so they can spy on all of us in order to figure out whom among us is a Bad Guy, and then "travel back in time" through each newly discovered "bad guy's" communications to identify their confederates and detail their nefarious plots.

This is an old, old, old fight. It was arguably the first policy fight of the digital era: the fight over whether we could have working encryption at all. Old hands call this era "the crypto wars" (from when "crypto" meant "cryptography"), when the NSA classed working encryption code as a "munition" and criminalized civilian access to it. That was a very hard-fought fight, and it was won decisively by the Electronic Frontier Foundation and our just-retired executive director Cindy Cohn, who, as a young lawyer, litigated the "Bernstein case" that established that code was a form of expressive speech protected by the First Amendment. If you're interested in learning more about this, you should read Cindy's newly published memoir, Privacy's Defender (all profits go to EFF):

https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262051248/privacys-defender/

Before Cindy came on the scene, the crypto wars were being fought primarily by the "cypherpunks," a motley gang of computer security enthusiasts of many political stripes who were unified by their conviction that the most important aspect of security was defensive. The fact that the NSA wanted to be able to read the private messages and files of their adversaries (the "Four Horsemen of the Infocalypse": terrorists, drug traffickers, child pornographers and organized crime) must not be allowed to trump the fact that any encryption that the NSA could pierce could also be pierced by bad guys: corporate spies, state-sponsored spies, griefers, petty criminals, stalkers, identity thieves and other creeps.

This argument was so indisputable, it's a tautology: "You cannot make a computer user more secure by making their computers less secure." We don't know how to make a computer that only "good guys" can break into, but which "bad guys" bounce off of. Either we make computers more secure, or we don't.

We didn't.

In the decades since the crypto wars, governments have embarked upon an uninterrupted program to weaken the security of our computers, with catastrophic effect. The most spectacular example is unquestionably the spy agencies' doctrine called "NOBUS," which stands for "no one but us"; as in "No one but us is smart enough to find this bug, which means that we can withhold its discovery from the manufacturer, which will allow us to weaponize this bug and use it to attack our enemies. Because no one but us is smart enough to find this bug, none of those enemies will ever discover it, weaponize it, and use it to attack the people who pay our salaries, who expect us to keep them safe."

This turns out to be both catastrophically wrong and catastrophically dangerous. A series of leaks of computer vulnerabilities hoarded by both the NSA and CIA under NOBUS confirmed that these bugs were independently rediscovered by criminals and state actors at the rate of about 20% per year. Worse, though, is that these bugs don't need to be independently rediscovered, because the NSA and CIA both leaked them.

The highest-profile leak was an NSA-hoarded vulnerability in Windows they codenamed "Eternal Blue." Eternal Blue leaked in 2017, whereupon cybercriminals hybridized it with some otherwise undistinguished ransomware to create Wannacry, a devastating piece of malware that took down hospitals, banks and oil pipelines, as well as the entire city government of Baltimore and the British Library:

https://cdn.sanity.io/files/v5dwkion/production/99206a2d1e9f07b35712b78f7d75fbb09560c08d.pdf

But NOBUS isn't the only example of spy agencies making our computers less secure in the name of making us more secure. Perhaps the most egregious example of that are the Bundestrojaners, malicious software purchased by the German government, whose customs agents secretly installed it on the computers of unsuspecting people during border inspections. This "lawful interception" software was hugely invasive: it could grab your screen, plunder your hard drive, and install and execute software on your computer, all with the utmost stealth, intended to keep you from knowing it was installed and operating on your computer. But it wasn't merely invasive – it was insecure, so anyone (rival spies, criminals, stalkers) could scan the internet for infected computers and take them over:

https://www.ccc.de/en/updates/2011/staatstrojaner

You really couldn't ask for a more perfect example of the maxim that you can't make computer users more secure by making their computers less secure. Despite this, governments continue to demand the introduction of grave, universal secure vulnerabilities into our digital lives. Take "chat control," a proposal to force every device manufacturer to install software that continuously scans your devices for child sex abuse material (AKA "child porn"):

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/04/eu-parliament-blocks-mass-scanning-our-chats-whats-next

There are plenty of things wrong with this, starting with the fact that it requires your device to secretly grab and transmit sensitive images from your phone, which might include sensitive images of your kids that were requested by their doctors. This isn't a hypothetical: it's something that happened to a dad who subsequently lost his email, his login to every other account, his phone number, all of his files (including his tax records and his business data), and every photo he had ever taken of his family, without appeal, after Google automatically detected a photo he took of his son to send to the family pediatrician. Google also falsely accused this man of sexually abusing his child and sicced the SFPD on him:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/08/22/allopathic-risk/#snitches-get-stitches

But even if you're not worried about this, you should still have the object permanence to recall the lessons of NOBUS and the Bundestrojaner. We can't make computer users more secure by making their computers less secure, and it's hard to imagine something more insecure than a computer that you entrust with every sensitive detail of your life that is designed to run computer code in secret that you can neither inspect nor terminate (let alone delete).

Hardly a day goes by without some country demanding that your computer's security be weakened in the name of protecting you. For years, both Conservative and Labour UK governments have been steaming towards a total ban on working encryption in the name of catching bad guys:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/03/05/theyre-still-trying-to-ban-cryptography/

It's happening in Canada, too, where somehow "digital sovereignty" means "making every device used in Canada vulnerable to foreign spies so that our own spies can access our private communications":

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/05/canadas-bill-c-22-repackaged-version-last-years-surveillance-nightmare

Then there's the "age verification" laws proliferating all around the world. Remember, there's no such thing as "age verification," there's only "spying on everyone, all the time, to figure out who the kids are":

https://pluralistic.net/2026/06/23/destroy-the-village/#to-save-it

Age verification requires multiple entities to assemble vast corpuses of the kinds of sensitive identification papers that would allow identity thieves to destroy the finances and lives of everyone in the country, and (as foretold) every time it's tried, these files leak. Someday, this will lead to doxing whole countries:

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/02/discord-faces-backlash-over-age-checks-after-data-breach-exposed-70000-ids/

Age verification is the latest and worst stage in governments' fraught relationship with private sector data-collection. The USA is the worst offender here: it is the largest, richest country in the world that has essentially no privacy protections. The last time the US updated its federal privacy law was in 1988, when the Video Privacy Protection Act banned the disclosure of your VHS rentals. Tech companies spy on you for the same reason your dog licks its balls – because they can, and no one stops them:

https://pluralistic.net/2026/03/10/ice-tech/#foreseeable-outcomes

Which raises an obvious question: why hasn't Congress updated privacy law? And why hasn't the EU figured out how to force the US companies that pretend to be Irish to obey European privacy law? The answer is that governments love private sector data-collection, because it gives them a cheap, off-the-books source of warrantless access to information they aren't legally allowed to acquire:

https://pluralistic.net/2021/04/13/public-interest-pharma/#axciom

From Flock cameras to ICE's use of Google data in its ethnic cleansing campaign, the US government and the commercial surveillance industry have created a public-private partnership from hell, where governments refuse to block commercial spying and companies hand their commercial surveillance data over to governments in return.

From there, it was a short leap to governments insisting that the private sector gather our data. That's the right way to think about age verification, chat control, and other mandates for corporations to spy on us using our devices and our accounts: a government requirement for private-sector mass surveillance.

I have plenty of hostility to corporate overreach, but to have any hope of fighting that overreach, we need governments to be on our side. But for our governments, it comes to cybersecurity, we are the enemy, and spying corporations are our governments' allies.

Sometimes, that's utterly, literally true. Governments around the world are addicted to buying spyware from cyber-arms dealers, mostly headquartered in Israel and the UAE (with the odd Italian and British company for variety). These arms-dealers practice NOBUS-by-proxy, wherein they discover or pay bounties for bugs in widely used hardware, operating systems and applications and – rather than reporting them to the manufacturer – hoard them and weaponize them, and then sell the weapons to criminals, corporations, and our governments, who give them billions of our money to ensure that our computers have huge, glaring defects in them that leave us terribly vulnerable:

https://citizenlab.ca/focus-area/targeted-surveillance/

In a world where our governments' national security apparatuses were genuinely committed to our safety and security, they would criminally prosecute these companies, not make their owners into billionaires.

This is the context we should all be thinking about when it comes to these "rogue AI hacking agents." The IT systems that these irresponsibly deployed software products have trashed were already terrifyingly vulnerable…by design. Rather than fix these systems, our governmental "security" agencies have spent the past 40 years making them less secure, in order to make it easier for them to catch "bad guys," who now find it trivial to attack us through systems we are all totally reliant upon.

In every way, in every area of law, governments fail to take our security seriously. That even includes copyright law. All over the world, the US Trade Representative has ensured that every country has an "anti-circumvention" law that makes it a crime to reverse-engineer and modify software without permission:

https://pluralistic.net/2026/01/01/39c3/#the-new-coalition

From the very start, these have been a security nightmare. Remember the "Sony Rootkit?" Between 2005-2007, Sony-BMG Music distributed over 6m CDs that were deliberately infected with a piece of malicious software called a "rootkit" that was used to disable your computer's ability to rip (copy) music CDs.

The way this rootkit did so was depraved in its indifference to the security of Sony-BMG's customers: at the same time as Sony-BMG's malware installed its secret anti-ripping program, it also altered their computers' operating systems to make them incapable of detecting any program or file whose name started with $SYS$. Immediately, malicious software authors started adding $SYS$ to the start of all their filenames, and that malicious software was therefore undetectable to millions of users' computers. It was even invisible to anti-virus software. Worse: Sony-BMG's rootkit infected 200,000-300,000 US government and military networks:

https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/11/sonys_drm_rootk.html

Even worse: after the scandal broke, security researchers all over the world came forward to say that they'd discovered the Sony Rootkit months before it became common knowledge, but their lawyers had told them they weren't allowed to disclose its existence because doing so would fall afoul of anti-circumvention law. For months, this official, deliberate malware epidemic spread in secret because of anti-circumvention law.

It's been more than 20 years since the Sony Rootkit, and anti-circumvention law is now worse than it was in the oughts: now it applies to far more devices from far more vendors. Today, it's common for corporations to threaten their own customers with civil and criminal liability if they have the temerity to hire outside auditors to evaluate the software they entrust their businesses to for security defects. And oh God, it's even worse, because the worst offender is Oracle, who are now the de facto IT czars of America:

https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/08/oracle-security-chief-to-customers-stop-checking-our-code-for-vulnerabilities/

I'm not saying that these are the only problems with our IT security. What I am saying is that the hacking bots everyone's freaking out about didn't appear out of nowhere. If you have just a little object permanence, you can see that they are the terminal stage of a pathology that governments have only ever worsened: by hoarding and weaponizing vulnerabilities; by paying others to hoard and weaponize vulnerabilities; by criminalizing security audits; by insisting that every computer we rely on be equipped with deliberate vulnerabilities in software we can't inspect, terminate or delete.

Yeah, there should be criminal and civil liability for OpenAI, Amazon, Anthropic and every other company whose bots "went rogue" and attacked servers. But that will do nothing to fix our IT.

The table-stakes for a secure digital world are: public agencies that try to make our computers as secure as possible, including by administering the corporate death-penalty to any company that hoards and weaponizes information about bugs in our computer. We should protect and reward individuals and firms who come forward with true disclosures about bugs in systems we rely upon. We should not give companies the right to silence and punish those critics who want to warn us about their defective products. And we should not require that companies make us less secure in the name of making it easier for spies and cops to catch the bad guys.

(Image: Pmk58, CC BY-SA 4.0; Wikipedian Prolific, CC BY-SA 3.0; modified)


Hey look at this (permalink)



A shelf of leatherbound history books with a gilt-stamped series title, 'The World's Famous Events.'

Object permanence (permalink)

#25yrsago CBS sitcom about couple who meet in the WTC rubble https://web.archive.org/web/20011014082646/http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/eo/20011012/en/cbs_considers_wtc_comedy_1.html

#25yrsago Jon Norman not invited to Philcon https://www.locusmag.com/2001/Departments/Letters10Norman.html

#25yrsago Bruce Sterling's post-9/11 geopolitics predictions https://web.archive.org/web/20011102212150/https://www.edge.org/documents/whatnow/whatnow_sterling.html

#25yrsago Polaroid files Chapter 11 https://web.archive.org/web/20011107181428/http://www.polaroid.com/polinfo/press_releases/october01/101201a.html

#25yrsago David Mamet's tribute to Shel Silverstein https://www.nytimes.com/2001/10/14/theater/theater-a-beloved-friend-who-lived-life-the-chicago-way.html

#15yrago Great Big Beautiful Tomorrow: a chapbook in PM Press’s Outspoken Authors series https://craphound.com/category/gbbt/

#15yrsago Canadian government advice defines abortionists as terrorists https://www.jezebel.com/canadian-government-lists-abortionists-as-terrorists-u-5849963

#10yrsago Ikea Shanghai to elderly, lonely Chinese people: buy something or get out https://qz.com/806990/lonely-shanghai-seniors-now-have-to-buy-something-if-they-want-to-cruise-all-day-in-ikeas-cafeteria

#5yrsago Facebook shows mall ninja gear ads on insurrection articles https://pluralistic.net/2021/01/14/10-point-program/#monetizing

#5yrsago The Black Panther self-care method https://pluralistic.net/2021/01/14/10-point-program/#panthers


Upcoming appearances (permalink)

A photo of me onstage, giving a speech, pounding the podium.



A screenshot of me at my desk, doing a livecast.

Recent appearances (permalink)



A grid of my books with Will Stahle covers..

Latest books (permalink)



A cardboard book box with the Macmillan logo.

Upcoming books (permalink)

  • "The Post-American Internet," a geopolitical sequel of sorts to Enshittification, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2027
  • "Unauthorized Bread": a middle-grades graphic novel adapted from my novella about refugees, toasters and DRM, FirstSecond, April 20, 2027

  • "Enshittification, Why Everything Suddenly Got Worse and What to Do About It" (the graphic novel), Firstsecond, 2027

  • "The Memex Method," Farrar, Straus, Giroux, 2027



Colophon (permalink)

Today's top sources:

Currently writing:

  • “Once Is Enemy Action,” a science fiction novel about the origins of modern technofascism. Today's words: 574 (7730 total).

  • "The Post-American Internet," a sequel to "Enshittification," about the better world the rest of us get to have now that Trump has torched America. Fourth draft completed. Submitted to editor.

  • A Little Brother short story about DIY insulin PLANNING


This work – excluding any serialized fiction – is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. That means you can use it any way you like, including commercially, provided that you attribute it to me, Cory Doctorow, and include a link to pluralistic.net.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Quotations and images are not included in this license; they are included either under a limitation or exception to copyright, or on the basis of a separate license. Please exercise caution.


How to get Pluralistic:

Blog (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

Pluralistic.net

Newsletter (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

https://pluralistic.net/plura-list

Mastodon (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

https://mamot.fr/@pluralistic

Bluesky (no ads, possible tracking and data-collection):

https://bsky.app/profile/doctorow.pluralistic.net

Medium (no ads, paywalled):

https://doctorow.medium.com/

Tumblr (mass-scale, unrestricted, third-party surveillance and advertising):

https://mostlysignssomeportents.tumblr.com/tagged/pluralistic

"When life gives you SARS, you make sarsaparilla" -Joey "Accordion Guy" DeVilla

READ CAREFULLY: By reading this, you agree, on behalf of your employer, to release me from all obligations and waivers arising from any and all NON-NEGOTIATED agreements, licenses, terms-of-service, shrinkwrap, clickwrap, browsewrap, confidentiality, non-disclosure, non-compete and acceptable use policies ("BOGUS AGREEMENTS") that I have entered into with your employer, its partners, licensors, agents and assigns, in perpetuity, without prejudice to my ongoing rights and privileges. You further represent that you have the authority to release me from any BOGUS AGREEMENTS on behalf of your employer.

ISSN: 3066-764X

12:14

Editor's Soapbox: Digital Mail [The Daily WTF]

Ever get some special letter, card, or picture from a friend or loved one that you held onto, maybe even taped to your cube or office wall? Is it something you still look at fondly, something that lifts your spirits whenever you're down? Certainly, a thoughtful card or letter is much nicer than a thoughtful email.

Now imagine your special keepsake being scanned, censored, and converted into a digital file that you can only view from a tablet — assuming you can afford the fee to access the tablet. The original has been destroyed; it's gone forever. You'll never get to see or feel it in your hands.

Birthday Card, 30 October 1943, page 2 of 2

It sounds almost too cruel, like something you'd find in a Fallout game. Unfortunately, it's reality for more and more people incarcerated in US prisons.

I've been writing to an incarcerated person for a while now myself. I find the process incredibly rewarding; I think about my friend all the time and wish them well. Unfortunately, the scanning and processing takes absolutely forever, so in a given year we only exchange 3 letters per side. The digitized files that I receive have names censored out of them; I have no idea what's removed from my letters before my friend receives them. For me, this is all too reminiscent of exchanging letters with my grandmother in Iran before she died. Agents there would straight-up open the envelope, confiscate any valuables inside, marker over anything they didn't like, then re-seal the envelope and send it back on its merry way.

Over 30 US states now digitize the mail passing in and out of prisons, relying on AI to judge what's kosher and what isn't. If you thought AI was great with resumes, just wait until you task it with threat detection! It's been working so well that one nonprofit organization had to change its name: the word fight, used in any context whatsoever, gets flagged.

Once mail is scanned, it's only accessible by tablets that have to be paid for. Incarcerated people are already nickled and dimed for a ridiculous number of things and surely don't need more fees.

It doesn't stop at mail, either. The latest tech is also being used to eliminate physical visitation. Because if there's anything the pandemic taught us, it's that nothing beats seeing your loved ones exclusively on a screen for years at a stretch.

The states justify these egregious measures by playing the drug card. They're necessary to stop drugs from entering the prisons. But these states stop short of providing evidence to show that these tech-facilitated practices are actually having the intended effect. Even if they magically solved drug trafficking forever, could any result truly justify the vast harm being inflicted upon incarcerated people, their families, and their friends? Physical mail and visitation are necessary lifelines and psychological boosts for those who might otherwise have nothing and no one to hold onto during an unimaginably difficult time of their lives.

Do I really have to explain the benefit of parents and children exchanging homework, letters, and pictures?

I'm angry about this on so many levels. If you are, too, here's some stuff we can do to fight work against this together:

  • Support prison abolition with your time, money, and/or IT superpowers. Forced prison labor is slavery. The entire punitive model is cruel, biased, and far less effective than approaches like restorative and community-based justice. Moving on is long overdue and the best way to make all of this stop.
  • Avoid working for companies that facilitate these practices. Tell your friends not to work for them, either. If you're stuck working for them for survival's sake, look for ways to enact positive change from the inside.
  • Spread the word of what's happening. Most people have no idea. Use your knowledge to educate technical and non-technical folks. They might want to do something about this, too.
  • Write to incarcerated people yourself. Like Bob Ross said, "Everybody needs a friend." Knowing there's someone in your corner who cares about you makes all the difference in the world. Sites like WriteAPrisoner.com will match you up with a pen pal.

A drop of water seems harmless, but get enough of those together and you carve out the Grand Canyon. If we all do something to help, however big or small, our massed effort becomes something powerful. As tech professionals, we are especially empowered to push back on these cruel and abusive practices. We must act now, before they move out of prisons and into mainstream society.

Do you want your post office to start doing this?

Sources:

[Advertisement] Picking up NuGet is easy. Getting good at it takes time. Download our guide to learn the best practice of NuGet for the Enterprise.

10:35

The unreliable witness [Seth's Blog]

It might be us.

Even when there are photos, videos or tape recordings, people find that they can’t agree on what happened.

Our vivid recollections can be vivid, but they might not be accurate.

What would happen if, for a moment, we imagined that our version of what happened might not be the only one?

08:49

Bedroom Boudoir Blues by Jey Pawlik [Oh Joy Sex Toy]

Bedroom Boudoir Blues by Jey Pawlik

Sometimes you need to lean on others to love you first before you can finally love yourself. Hey folks, I’m back (kind of), with this really nice semi-autobio story for you all. It’s something I’ve been thinking about a lot lately, and while I didn’t want to draw myself for this one, I had such […]

05:42

C++ futures part 1: The mental model [The Old New Thing]

The C++ standard library has a group of related functions and classes: std::promise, std::packaged_task, std::async, std::future, and std::sharedfuture.

The idea is that all of these classes are built of a single unnamed class which the C++ standard library calls the “state”, but for the purpose of discussion, I’m going to call it the source, since it is the thing that produces the value, and it behaves analogously to a C# task completion source.

The source conceptually supports these operations:

  • Set a value.
  • Set an exception.
  • Wait for a value or exception to be set.
  • Retrieve the value or rethrow the exception.

Here’s a simplified version that doesn’t support references.

template<typename T>
struct source
{
private:
    enum what {
        nothing,
        value,
        exception,
        consumed,
    } d; // discriminant

    union {
        T value;
        std::exception_ptr ex;
    } r; // result

    std::mutex m;
    std::condition_variable cv;

The discriminant tells us what is in the union: Nothing (because nobody has set anything), a value, an exception, or nothing (because the value has been consumed).

The mutex ensures thread-safe access to the other members, and the condition variable lets us wait for somebody to set a value or exception.

    void must_be_empty() {
        if (d != what::empty) {
            throw std::future_error(future_errc::promise_already_satisfied);
        }
    }

You can call the set methods only when the source is empty, so we’ll factor out the emptiness check.

public:
    void set_value(T& v) {
        std::lock_guard g(m);
        must_be_empty();
        new(&r.value) T(v); // "r.value = v"
        d = what::value;
        cv.notify_all();
    }

You can set a value or exception only once, so if there is already a value or exception, we yell at you. Otherwise, we save the value and notify anybody who was waiting for a value to be set.

I won’t bother with the overload that takes T&&; it’s the same thing, but with a std::move().

There is also a set_value_at_thread_exit which will be another topic for another day.

Instead of setting a value, you can set an exception:

    void set_exception(std::exception_ptr ex) {
        std::lock_guard g(m);
        must_be_empty();
        new(&r.ex) std::exception_ptr(ex); // "r.ex = ex"
        d = what::exception;
        cv.notify_all();
    }

It’s basically the same as set_value except that we store an exception.

That’s how values an exceptions go into the source. The next part is waiting for the source to become nonempty.

    void wait() {
        std::lock_guard g(m);
        while (d == what::empty) {
            cv.wait(g);
        }
    }

    void wait_for(duration dur) {
        std::lock_guard g(m);
        cv.wait_for(g, dur, [&] { return d != what::empty; });
    }

You can either wait indefinitely or wait for a particular duration. The wait_for method is why we have a condition variable at all. If it weren’t for that guy, we could have used std::atomic‘s wait and notify_all methods.

The last part is getting the values out.

    void can_get() {
        if (d == what::consumed) {
            throw std::future_error(future_errc::future_already_retrieved);
        }
        if (d == what::exception) {
            std::rethrow_exception(r.ex);
        }
    }

Regardless of how we intend to retrieve the value, it’s not legal to retrieve a value that has already been consumed. Also, if the result is an exception, we rethrow the exception.

    T consume() {
        wait();
        std::lock_guard g(m);
        can_get();
        d = what::consumed;
        return std::move(r.v);
    }

    const T& get() {
        wait();
        std::lock_guard g(m);
        can_get();
        return r.v;
    }
};

You can get the value, which returns a const reference to the underlying storage. Or you can consume the value, which moves the value out of the underlying storage and marks the value as consumed so nobody can consume or get it (because it’s not there any more).

We can now build our other objects and functions out of this guy. We’ll do that next time.

Bonus chatter: Writing the destructor is left as an exercise for the reader. It’s not hard, but it’s annoying because of the union.

Bonus bonus chatter: I’m writing the series because I always forget how it works, but writing it down helps me remember.

The post C++ futures part 1: The mental model appeared first on The Old New Thing.

05:28

23 years of Child's Play! [Penny Arcade]

We are just about one month out from the 2026 Child’s Play charity dinner and auction! On November 13th we will once again be getting together to raise money for the cause we started all the way back in 2003! 

 

 

03:56

Man-Made Horrors, Part Three [Penny Arcade]

I mean, I'm a sucker for it too, and I came of age when that's just what teevee looked like. My youngest craves horror, horror of all kinds, but if she sees the tracking go off on a pretend VCR she recoils as though from a serpent.

02:21

Listening And Learning [QC RSS v2]

Hannelore can speak instagram sans

01:49

Maytham Alsudany: Menus without JavaScript [Planet Debian]

This is more of a note to myself since I keep forgetting and "rediscovering" this technique every time I need it, but if it helps you, great!

The JavaScript way is to toggle displaying the menu based on a button click. For instance, here's an example in Svelte:

[This interactive/preview is only available on the website.]
<script lang="ts">
        let showMenu = $state(false);
</script>

<button onclick={() => (showMenu = !showMenu)}>
        {#if showMenu}
                Hide menu
        {:else}
                Show menu
        {/if}
</button>
<nav class:hidden={!showMenu}>
        <ul>
                <li>Home</li>
                <li>Blog</li>
                <li>Foo</li>
                <li>Bar</li>
        </ul>
</nav>

<style>
        .hidden {
                display: none;
        }
</style>

But there is a hack to use a hidden checkbox and some CSS to achieve the same thing without any JavaScript. The example here turns the menu button into a label that toggles the checkbox, and uses the checkbox state to determine when to show the menu via the next-sibling combinator.

[This interactive/preview is only available on the website.]
<input type="checkbox" id="menu-state" />
<div class="menu-ctn">
        <label class="menu-toggle" for="menu-state">
                <span class="menu-closed">Show menu</span>
                <span class="menu-open">Hide menu</span>
        </label>
        <nav class="menu-open">
                <ul>
                        <li>Home</li>
                        <li>Blog</li>
                        <li>Foo</li>
                        <li>Bar</li>
                </ul>
        </nav>
</div>

<style>
        #menu-state {
                display: none;
        }
        .menu-open {
                display: none;
        }
        .menu-closed {
                display: block;
        }
        #menu-state:checked + .menu-ctn .menu-open {
                display: block;
        }
        #menu-state:checked + .menu-ctn .menu-closed {
                display: none;
        }
</style>

00:14

Monday, 12 October

23:21

Link [Scripting News]

Gruber is right. The only way for the others to compete with Twitter is to start innovating. Get rid of the limits. The funny thing is Twitter, the dominant leader, is moving forward and getting rid of character limits, and introducing styles and links. They're acting like the little guy while the others, Bluesky, Mastodon, Threads, aren't doing anything to be more useful. That whole market is stuck in 2006 and the myth that 140 chars somehow was magic. It wasn't. It killed the web as a writer's platform. If you want to compete with Twitter, drop your proprietary protocols, hook up to the web standards, and peer with your competitors. I wouldn't be surprised if Twitter joined you. They have the same kind of competitive spirit that successful big companies have. It's time for their competitors to not win users through guilt, rather by providing a better service. Back in the day, we hated Microsoft's plan to suffocate the web, but we admired their tenacity and the way they kept the pressure on their competitors. We've had 20 years of stagnation in social networking. Time to stop being so sensitive. Bluesky made huge promises, and they aren't happening, and that was already years ago. Time for Plan B. I don't really care about the others, Masto isn't going to move and Threads? Wtf is that. Inbound and outbound RSS 2.0, is the way to go. And Markdown is the way you do text. This is what matters, you all are making something that's really simple so unbearably complicated.

22:49

Bicycling Like It’s My Job [Nina Paley]

It kinda is my job right now, since we’re designing the Jackalope V2 and I need a lot of test miles on V1 for data.

Jackalope V1, yesterday morning

I’ve now put over 350 miles on Jackie the Jackalope (V1). Averaging my miles-per-hour over the 5 longer (30-100 mile) rides on her so far, I get 12.96mph.

Easy Racers Ti-Rush, this morning

For comparison, I rode my fastest bike, Titania the Ti Rush, 64 miles today at an overall 15mph. Over my last 5 rides on Titania my average was 14.74mph.

Dividing 12.96 by 14.74 we get 0.87924016.
Thus, the Jackalope V1 is about 88% as efficient as the Ti Rush.

I’ve been disappointed in the Jackalope’s lower speeds but really this isn’t terrible. V1 is massively overbuilt and heavy, at least as heavy as my steel Tour Easy. She has a Rohloff Speed Hub internal gear system, which is heavier and less efficient than a traditional rear derailleur. The hinge and elastomer surely reduce efficiency a bit. It’s also possible that the Calfee Stiletto geometry on which she’s based is inherently less efficient than the Easy Racers Ti Rush.

Calfee Stiletto, a few days ago

In fact I just checked my Stiletto’s average MPH over 7 rides: it’s 13.53, against which V1 compares pretty well, at about 96% efficient. That’s actually better than the efficiency penalty of the Rohloff hub alone, estimated at 94.5%.

Maybe we should ditch the Stiletto geometry entirely and go back to the ol’ drawing board, and base V2 on Easy Racers geometry – or the Carver Ti-Glide. Hmm…

Share

The post Bicycling Like It’s My Job appeared first on Nina Paley.

21:56

Steinar H. Gunderson: Decompilation patterns part 9, sign extension [Planet Debian]

Today, for something completely different:

s.x = (s16) ((s32) (temp_v0 << 0x10) >> 0x11);

MIPS has 16-bit loads and stores, but not 16-bit (signed) arithmetic, so if it wants to do that, it needs to sign-extend to 32-bit first. And it does that by first shifting up by 16 so that the 16-bit sign bit is at the 32-bit sign bit, and then it can do an arithmetic shift afterwards. So what you want is:

s16 temp_v0;

s.x = temp_v0 >> 1;

Sometimes, it can be pretty stubborn, and you'll need to go through memory or similar before GCC really inserts the shift patterns you want.

18:42

Zero to Agent in 30 Minutes: Build a Personal Assistant on OpenClaw [Radar]

In the final episode of Zero to Agent in 30 Minutes, AI engineer Sajal Sharma showed how to build a personal assistant on OpenClaw that tracks your tasks and notes and handles scheduled work on its own.

A useful personal assistant has to be reachable when you’re away from your computer and keep running when it has scheduled work to do. OpenClaw supports both, and you decide where the agent runs, which models it uses, and how it accesses your data.

How to go from a fresh install to scheduled automations, step-by-step

  1. Install your OpenClaw instance. Sajal recommends starting locally while you learn how it works, then moving to an always-on machine or hosted environment if you need continuous availability.
  2. Connect the channels you use. Add a messaging channel such as Telegram, WhatsApp, or Slack so you can reach the assistant away from your desk. Sajal used Telegram in his demo to send requests and receive notifications from the same assistant.
  3. Set up the assistant’s workspace. Give the agent a place to keep tasks, notes, skills, and memory, along with guidance files that define how it behaves and how it should work with the files in that workspace.
  4. Use it in your daily workflows. Sajal asked the assistant for an overview of current projects and checked progress toward a reading goal. He also had it search the web for a book series and add the books it found to his reading list.
  5. Add proactive automations. Schedule work the assistant should handle on its own. Sajal added a Telegram reminder and a morning briefing designed to pull from tasks, a calendar, and recent email. Recurring checks and webhooks can also trigger the agent when something changes in another system.

Thanks for following Zero to Agent

This episode closes out Zero to Agent in 30 Minutes. Thanks for watching and building along with our presenters throughout the series.

If you’d like to keep following how agents can take on more complex work, tune in to The Monday Morning Agent, which debuts Monday, October 12, at 8am PT/11am ET. The eight-episode series follows the development of an increasingly autonomous data agent working with real play-by-play data. Learn more and save your seat or follow along here on Radar.

Designing Websites for People and AI Agents with WebMCP [Radar]

The following article originally appeared on the Agentic AI Foundation blog and is being reposted here with the author’s permission.

Websites are designed for people. We can look at a page and quickly understand where to enter information or which control will complete an action.

AI agents don’t see or use the web the same way we do. An agent may have to process a screenshot or inspect the page’s underlying structure, then reason about which control matches the request.

The additional context increases token use, and each interpretation step creates another chance for error.

WebMCP (not to be confused with MCP) gives web developers a standard way to publish structured tools to access the capabilities of their website enabling agents to call those functions with structured inputs.

A developer can register a tool through document.modelContext and give it a name and description. The tool also defines an input schema and the function that runs when an agent calls it.

For example, an article site could publish a search tool that calls the same application code as its visible search form.

const searchToolController = new AbortController();

await document.modelContext.registerTool(
  {
    name: "search-articles",
    title: "Search articles",
    description: "Search published articles by topic.",
    inputSchema: {
      type: "object",
      properties: {
        query: {
          type: "string",
          description: "The topic or phrase to search for."
        }
      },
      required: ["query"],
      additionalProperties: false
    },
    async execute({ query }) {
      const articles = await searchArticles(query);
      renderSearchResults(articles);
      return { articles };
    }
  },
  { signal: searchToolController.signal }
);

// Call this when the search tool should no longer be available.
// searchToolController.abort();

The name and description tell the agent when to use the tool. The input schema defines the arguments it can send. The execute function calls the site’s existing search logic and updates the page with the results.

The browser makes the registered tool available to a supported agent while the page is active. When the agent calls it, the browser passes the structured arguments to execute and returns the result.

When the search tool should no longer be available, the page can unregister it by calling searchToolController.abort().

A page registers tools that match its current state. A content view may provide a search tool, while an editor can provide tools for changing the selected content. The agent then discovers the tools available for the page’s current state.

WebMCP also proposes a declarative path for existing HTML forms. The article search could be exposed through attributes on the form itself.

<form
  action="/articles"
  method="get"
  toolname="search-articles"
  tooldescription="Search published articles by topic."
>
  <label for="article-query">Topic</label>
  <input
    id="article-query"
    name="query"
    type="search"
    toolparamdescription="The topic or phrase to search for."
    required
  >
  <button type="submit">Search</button>
</form>

The browser uses the form attributes and controls to create the tool definition. Because the form omits toolautosubmit, the browser populates the field but leaves the final click to the person. The person can review the search query and click the Search button.

Keep the person and agent in the same interface

A WebMCP tool uses the state already visible in the application and the person’s active session. The shared page gives the person a place to review the agent’s work. When the agent completes an action, the person can see the updated state and make changes through the normal interface.

Web developers can also reuse application logic that already handles the visible interface. OpenAI’s Runme example is a browser application that registers tools for reading instructions and updating notebook content. Runme can offer those functions through the page without adding a separate server only to expose an MCP endpoint.

Pair WebMCP with MCP

WebMCP and MCP both expose tools to agents, but they operate in different parts of an application. Understanding the difference helps developers decide where each one fits and how they can work together.

An MCP server can provide tools when no related page is open. A WebMCP tool is attached to the current document and can use the page’s current state.

WebMCP standardizes how a page registers tools with the browser. The browser can present those tools to its agent through MCP or another function calling mechanism.

MCP Apps address another part of the interaction. An MCP server can provide an interactive interface that a compatible host displays to a person. WebMCP lets an agent use functions from an existing website.

WebMCP and MCP Apps can work together. For example, a shopping website could publish a compare_products tool through WebMCP. An MCP server could provide an MCP App for the comparison, so the person can adjust the options while the agent handles the supporting work.

The comparison interface could also be described with A2UI, which lets an agent describe an interface in a declarative format. The client renders the description with components from its own design system, so the client controls which components are available and how they behave.

People and agents can use the same interface at the same time. Developers need to decide which functions the agent can call and what the person should see while those functions run.

Design the page for agent use

Agent use begins before the first click. An agent may need to discover the website and determine how to authenticate. It may choose an API or structured documentation before opening a browser.

Web teams should study how agents use their site before deciding which interface to add. Check the server logs to see whether agents are crawling HTML or requesting machine readable content. Tool activity can reveal which WebMCP functions agents discover and which calls they abandon.

Keep existing controls in the execution path

WebMCP reduces the amount of interface interpretation an agent has to do, but a structured tool is still an entry point into the application. The website should apply its existing access controls and input validation whenever the tool runs.

For example, an update_cart tool can accept a product identifier and quantity. The server should confirm that the product exists and that the current user can modify the cart. Structured input doesn’t automatically make the request trusted, so the server should run the same checks it uses for updates made through the website.

The browser also has a responsibility. OpenAI reviews each site tool call before it runs and asks the person to confirm sensitive actions. The WebMCP draft requires origin isolation, and its tools permissions policy allows same origin use by default.

Clients need to handle tool changes during a task. A page can change a tool’s identity or schema after the agent begins working, so the client should review the tool again before using the new definition.

Researchers are already testing those boundaries. A June preprint on WebMCP tool surface poisoning found that changes to tool registration and metadata could redirect agents in its test environment. The researchers used a polyfill and a headless agent, so a native browser implementation may behave differently. But these reported attacks can serve as great test cases as you’re adding WebMCP to your site.

Test WebMCP while the design is open

WebMCP already has several experimental implementations. Chrome offers an implementation through a flag and an origin trial. Sarah Drasner created an interactive WebMCP demo of this implementation that you can try in your browser.

Cloudflare released a developer preview that can add a WebMCP bridge to a website, and Brave has tested WebMCP with its Leo assistant.

Testing WebMCP against varied applications can reveal assumptions in the current draft. For example, a form may need a declarative feature that has not been specified yet. Also, look for lifecycle problems when a website changes its tools during a task.

Bring your findings back to the WebMCP issue tracker.

17:14

Link [Scripting News]

I like the web for people, sites that live and grow, like people. 100 years from now you should feel the people who lived there.

17:07

[$] The 2026 Maintainers Summit [LWN.net]

The Maintainers Summit is a one-day, invitation-only gathering of about 30 kernel developers; it is held once each year to discuss policy-related issues that are not always amenable to resolution via email. The 2026 event was scheduled for October 8 in Prague, Czechia. Unsurprisingly, the discussion there was dominated by large language models (LLMs) and their effect on the development community, but some time was also found to talk about security bugs and long-term succession planning.

16:28

The holy quinity of UNIX workstations [OSnews]

Many of us are interested in retrocomputing. There’s such a rich history of eras and machines to choose from, and countless niches and nuances to get lost in. Some people make it easy for themselves and are into old computers that are readily available at low prices, like the Commodore 64 or mid-’90s Macs, while others make it a bit harder on themselves by focusing on, say, computers from the former Soviet Union or NEC machines from Japan, which are harder to find and probably require a bigger purse, too.

And then there’s people like me. I’m making things incredibly hard on myself, because I am obsessed with a very specific set of computers – just five machines, to be exact. “Surely,” I hear you think, “collecting a mere five specific machines can’t be that hard, no? That’s how many spare Pismos I have in a box in case my primary one needs spare parts!” Sadly for me, the five computers I want to own more than any other are not particularly easy to find, and even when you do find one of them, pricing can easily reach the level of a decent used car.

Support OSNews

OSNews is ad-free, fully independent, not owned by any media conglomerate; we answer to nobody.
We need your donations and support to survive.

➡️ Donate through Ko-Fi ➡️ Donate through SEPA transfer* ➡️ Become a Patreon ➡️ Buy merch from our store

*Name: Thom Holwerda – IBAN: SE08 8000 0820 1684 4657 8414 – BIC: SWEDSESS

Regular OSNews readers will know: I am infatuated with UNIX workstations, or more specifically, UNIX workstations of the early 2000, and even more specifically, the final five models built by the last commercial UNIX vendors. So far, I’ve managed to get my hands on a mere two of them, but before my time on this earth come to an end, I intend to complete my Holy Quinity of UNIX Workstations. Let’s go down the list, roughly ordered by attainability.

HP c8000: PA-RISC/HP-UX

The HP c8000 is the absolute pinnacle of HP’s long-running line of workstations based on the PA-RISC architecture. The first PA-RISC workstation was launched in 1986, and HP would continue to improve the architecture and release new workstations all the way up until 2004, when the c8000 would be their last model. For the c8000, HP actually went all-out: it came with two dual-core PA-RISC processors running between 900MHz and 1.1GHz (depending on configuration), a maximum of 24GB of RAM, and a variety of graphics cards to choose from. It was a veritable swan song for the architecture.

HP’s commercial UNIX operating system, HP-UX, is even older than PA-RISC, with the first version being released in 1982, and its final version, HP-UX 11i v3 (or 11.31) released in 2007. This final version of HP-UX was updated and supported all the way up until 31 December 2025, but things are actually a bit more complicated than that. The last workstation release of HP-UX for PA-RISC was 11i v1 (released in 2000), while the last workstation release for Itanium workstations was 11i v2 (released in 2005). Do note that HP would provide updates, fixes, and patches to these versions long after the mentioned release dates.

Speaking of Itanium, HP’s final Itanium workstation was the zx6000, released in 2002, which can pack up to two single-core 1.5Ghz Itanium 2 processors. There’s a very real case to be made that the zx6000 should also be part of this list, since it’s both a little faster than the c8000 (in its dual 1.5GHz configuration) and runs a newer version of HP-UX. However, since Itanium workstations never really had much of an impact in the market (even HP only ever released two models), and since it lacks the decades of pedigree that comes with PA-RISC, I consider them a mere curiosity. A very cool curiosity that I’d love to own, but a curiosity nonetheless.1

Anyway, this is one of the two machines I already own. I have a new-in-box (when I bought it a few years ago) HP c8000 with two dual-core 1.0Ghz PA-RISC processors, 8 GB of RAM, and an ATI FireGL X3 AGP graphics card with 256 MB, the fastest the c8000 will take. It’s also got two SCSCI 74 GB hard drives in a striped RAID for better performance, and I added an LTO 4 tape drive so I could create bootable backups that will restore the machine if anything ever goes wrong.


It’s running HP-UX 11i v1, with as many of the updates, patches, and fixes I could find – which is one of the major roadblocks for anyone trying to get into HP-UX. Installation media are relatively easy to come by if you know where to look (assuming you know which specific version you need), but any updates, patches, and fixes from roughly later than 2005 are almost impossible to find. Some can be discovered through My HPE Software Center, if you have the patience of an angel and the perseverance of a honey badger (it’s a really terrible website), but most things are all locked away behind expensive support contracts or just gone entirely.

I’ve contacted HPE several times in several different ways about the preservation of HP-UX, but they never replied – clearly, they just don’t care about the preservation of their legendary UNIX platform or the enthusiast community buying PA-RISC hardware on eBay for personal use and experimentation. Sad, but par for the course.

The c8000 is quite easy to find on eBay, but do be aware that the “cheap” offerings of around €800 are the versions with just one processor. To get the version with two processors, expect to shell out twice as much. Spare parts and upgrades are readily available, too.

Sun Ultra 45: SPARC/Solaris

The Sun Ultra 45 needs no introduction here on OSNews, as I published an in-depth article about this machine and all the cool things you can do with it late last year. My Ultra 45 was an incredibly generous gift by Adriaan de Groot, who owned this machine as part of his work on porting KDE to Solaris way back in the day. I then ordered various upgrades to the machine to max it out with two UltraSPARC IIIi processors running at 1.6GHz, 8 GB of RAM, and the Sun XVR-2500 with 256MB, the fastest GPU it supports. I also bought the SunPCI IIIpro (an entire x86 PC on a PCI-X card) and a flash accelerator card.


The Ultra 45 is not supported by Solaris 11, so the most recent version you can run is Solaris 10, and more specifically, Solaris 10 1/13 (from January 2013). Solaris 10 is still receiving patch sets to this day, but like HPE, Oracle hides them behind expensive, unobtainable support contracts. My attempts at contacting Oracle have been more lacklustre than my attempts at contacting HPE, but either way, no response from Oracle either. They, too, do not care about the enthusiast community.

The Ultra 45 also tends to be readily available on eBay, and you can expect to pay about €1000 or so for a single-processor model, and anything between €1500-2000 for a dual-processor one. Spare parts and upgrades abound, but do note that Ultra 45 processor coolers are weirdly expensive.

SGI Tezro: MIPS/IRIX

SGI and IRIX are well-loved in the retro computing community, and there’s no shortage of hardware to choose from if you want to get into IRIX. However, if you’re obsessed with the final models of UNIX workstation lines like I am, you’re going to be in a bit of trouble – you’re going to want an SGI Tezro, the final MIPS workstation SGI made. The company launched this top-of-the-line model in 2003, and kept updating and selling it until 2007. In its most powerful configuration, you’re looking at four MIPS processors running at 1GHz each, with a maximum of 8GB of RAM, and a V12 VPro GPU with 128MB of RAM (with a DVI port instead of the more cumbersome 13W3 connector).

The Tezro can run IRIX all the way up until the operating system’s final version, 6.5.30, released in August of 2006. The operating system discs and patches are readily available all over the web, which is quite nice. Out of all the commercial UNIX platforms mentioned in this article, the SGI and IRIX community is definitely the most active and lively, with people developing and maintaining software for IRIX to this very day. There are also people working on maintaining modern Linux kernels for SGI machines, and there’s a ton of forum activity out there.

The Tezro is an incredibly rare beast, and they rarely come up for sale. I’ve only ever seen one Tezro’s final price, and I think it was sold for well in excess of €6000. I have never owned or even seen a single SGI machine, let alone a Tezro,

IBM IntelliStation POWER 285: POWER/AIX

Out of all the architectures mentioned in this article, IBM’s POWER is the only one still under active development; all the others were phased out and cancelled long ago. However, even though IBM is still developing POWER and releasing new generations every few years, the company hasn’t built a POWER workstation in a long time. The last one built by IBM2 was the IntelliStation POWER 285, released in October of 2005, and sold up until 2009. It packed a single-core or dual-core POWER5+ processor running at 1.9 or 2.1GHz, supported a maximum of 32GB of RAM, and there were three graphics cards to choose from, with the GXT6500P with 128MB being the most powerful option (a card from 2002!).

At roughly the same time as the POWER 285, IBM also sold the IntelliStation POWER 185. This was a very different beast, though, as instead of using a POWER5+ processor, it used one or two PowerPC 970 processors, which was a slightly beefed-up POWER4 design, making it a generation behind the 285. It also had a much stricter maximum RAM limit (8GB), but could run the same outdated GPUs as the 285. Regardless, the 285 is clearly the more powerful machine.

By the way, if the “970” moniker sounds familiar, it’s because Apple used these very same processors under the marketing name “PowerPC G5” for their various G5 Macs. My pet conspiracy theory about the origins of the POWER 185 is that with Apple switching to Intel, IBM was left with a pallet of unused 970s, and thus created the 185 to get rid of at least some of them. The timeline adds up, as Apple announced the switch to Intel in June 2005, and the POWER 185 was announced in February 2006. I don’t actually believe this, but it’s a funny theory nonetheless.

The IntelliStation POWER 285 can run AIX up to version 7.1 TL5, released in 2017, which is remarkably modern. Do note that AIX 7.1 was originally released in 2010, and the number of changes and patches released for 7.1 probably dropped off sharply after its first few years on the market. AIX installation discs, patches, and documentation is easy to find, and I’ve heard from enthusiasts who play with older POWER servers that IBM is remarkably friendly to the hobbyist community, and will gladly answer any emails and provide help when they can. Of course, that’s just what I’ve heard through the grapevine, and I can’t vouch for any of it.

These machines seem to be quite rare. I have never seen an IntelliStation POWER 285 (or 185, for that matter) come up for sale, so I have no clue what people would be charging for these. My uneducated prediction is that a reasonably configured 285 will probably go well north of €2000, maybe even €3000.

HP AlphaStation ES47: Alpha/Tru64

Through various acquisitions (Compact acquired DEC; HP acquired Compaq), Alpha ended up at HP3. It was under their brand that the final Alpha workstation was let loose onto the world in 2002/2003 (I’m not 100% sure): the AlphaStation ES47. It contained one or two Alpha EV7 processors running at 1Ghz (also known as the Alpha 21364 or Marvel and the last Alpha processor ever made), a maximum of 16GB of RAM, and an optional ATI Radeon 7500 graphics card with an unspecified amount of video memory. From what I’ve read online, this machine is an absolute monster, weighing in at close to 60kg, with noise levels that aren’t exactly office-friendly.

Alpha-based workstations and servers ran Tru64 UNIX, which was initially known as OSF/1 AXP and then as Digital UNIX, before Compaq renamed it to Tru64. The AlphaStation ES47 supports the final release of the operating system from 2010, version 5.1B-6, and its installation media, patches, and even its multitude of license files are readily available online. An interesting bonus is that like most Alpha machines, the ES47 can also run OpenVMS, up to the final Alpha release of OpenVMS from 2017, V8.4-2L2.

This machine, too, I have never seen come up for sale. Seeing the absolutely insane prices people are asking for Alpha hardware, though, I’m not sure I even want to know what an ES47 would go for. An AlphaStation 500 from 1997, with a 400MHz processor, goes for €2500. A DS15 from the same era as the ES47, a desktop form-factor with a single 1GHz processor, already has an asking price of almost €6000. It wouldn’t surprise me if an ES47 would hit close to €10000.

Why these machines?

Why not just settle for lower-end, older, more readily available machines? This is a valid question, with answers that are probably not satisfactory to everyone. Of course, there’s the simple monkey brain “bigger number better” feeling, where I want the fastest, “newest” hardware to get the best experience out of these commercial UNIX machines. Another important point is that these machines will all be able to run the latest workstation versions of their various UNIX flavours, which also helps in realising the best possible experience and potentially makes compiling modern software easier.

Since they’re newer, they also tend to be easier to work with in a more practical sense; you won’t need special monitors or keyboards or whatever, since they’re all compatible with standard PC monitors, keyboards, and mice. Having just one dedicated desk with a monitor, keyboard, and mouse that work on both my c8000 and Ultra 45 saves a ton of space and time, since I just need to move a few cables from one machine to the other if I want to change machines.

There’s also a more intangible reason, one that I value a great deal. All of these machines were developed and introduced well past the point where everybody knew full well the dedicated UNIX workstation market was basically dead. The x86 platform was improving at an incredible pace, and offered better performance at far lower prices than any of the architectures in this article ever could. Meanwhile, the kind of software these workstations were designed for had long been ported to Windows, negating the need for commercial UNIX on workstations even more.

In fact, all of these five machines were developed and introduced after their respective companies had already announced they would be leaving the UNIX workstation market (with the sole exception of possibly IBM). All of them represent the final hurrahs of platforms that for decades had been the envy of computer enthusiasts the world over, designed by people who already knew this would be the last UNIX workstation they’d ever make. This gives these machines a certain melancholy that I personally really enjoy, even if I can’t fully explain why.

Even before you turn these machines on, simply by looking at their specifications, feeling the build quality, and weighing the component choices, you can tell exactly just how much of their heart and soul its creators were allowed to put into it. The Ultra 45 and c8000 are great examples of this. As I detailed in my Ultra 45 article, the Ultra 45 is not materially different from the two machines that came before it, making it an already outdated machine by the time it came out. Hell, the processors in the Ultra 45 were three generations behind the state-of-the-art in SPARC at the time. The c8000, on the other hand, got brand new processors that were substantially faster than what had come before (the first dual-core PA-RISC processors!), a brand new chipset, and even brand new GPU options, and thus delivered a true upgrade over its predecessors.

For whatever reason, it seems that HP decided to put considerably more effort into its final UNIX workstation than Sun did, and I find that fascinating. I desperately want to experience these other three machines, so I can get an even better understanding of where these companies put their priorities. Each of these computers were developed and built under the same somber assumption – the last one we’ll ever make – but each company put their own unique spin on it through the people and means they assigned to the project, all in a time-frame of only a few years.

It’s the same story told in five different ways.

What’s stopping you?

There’s countless reasons why trying to collect these five machines is such an incredibly difficult endeavour. First and foremost, it’s obviously a money issue – I’m not even remotely wealthy enough to casually spend decent-used-car-money on what is essentially a hobby. Second, availability is a huge problem, as the three machines I do not yet have simply rarely, if ever, come up for sale. Even if I had the money to burn on this rather silly hobby, I couldn’t.

Availability is further hindered by the fact that I’m European and live in the Swedish Arctic. From experience, I know that rare hardware like these UNIX workstations seem to have been more common in the United States than in Europe. Furthermore, even if someone is trying to sell one of these in Europe and they choose to do so on one of the local, country-specific classifieds platforms, I’m going to be locked out. Importing any of these machines from the US is basically a non-starter, since shipping machines that easily weigh in excess of 30kg across the Atlantic is not only expensive, but often also simply not an option since US sellers don’t want to do so. The EU import duty lottery isn’t exactly helping either.

I am absolutely green with envy whenever I watch YouTube videos of people visiting the various Vintage Computer Festival events in the US, where I often spot countless of these machines in the background, sometimes for sale at very reasonable prices, just sitting there like it’s no big deal. Similar events in Europe seem to be much smaller in scope and more locally-oriented, making it much harder to build up a network of like-minded friends who might let you know of great finds in other parts of the continent.

Basically everything is working against me.

With the possible exception of certain computer museums, I don’t think there is anyone in the world who owns all five of these machines, and I definitely will not be the first. Sadly.

  1. Fun fact: the HP zx2000/zx6000 Itanium workstations and the c8000 PA-RISC workstation shared the same chipset and general architecture. They’re far more alike than it seems at first sight. ↩︎
  2. While IBM didn’t, Raptor Computing Systems did. I reviewed their small Blackbird POWER9 desktop, but also have their big, dual-processor POWER9 workstation. These machines cannot run any commercial UNIX, though, so they’re not UNIX workstations by my own, admittedly arbitrary, definition. ↩︎
  3. It’s kind of wild that out of these five platforms, three are currently owned by HPE (which split off from HP in 2015). Not only do they own HP-UX and Tru64, but also IRIX, since they acquired SGI in 2016. ↩︎

Will Linux phones become a viable alternative to the Android/iOS duopoly? [OSnews]

Amos B. Batto has published an incredibly detailed look at the state of Linux on smartphones. It’s an excellent read you really shouldn’t skip.

Five years ago, Linux phones looked like they were poised to become a viable alternative to the Android/iOS duopoly that has an iron grip on the mobile phone industry. Sadly, after a brief flash of activity and community engagement with the release of the Purism Librem 5 and the PINE64 PinePhone in 2020, the Linux phone market has generally stagnated. This stagnation occurred partly because of the problems at Purism and PINE64, but also because the available Linux SoC’s weren’t up to the task of running a modern smartphone, and the hardware industry wasn’t providing any good alternatives with good free/open source drivers. In addition, Plasma Mobile and Phosh were still inchoate mobile interfaces at the time, and there wasn’t a good distro option to run these interfaces on Android kernels with a normal integrated mobile SoC. The poor performance of the PinePhone and Librem 5 and the problems with the PinePhone Pro and the Librem 5 refunds sapped people’s enthusiasm and willingness to take a chance on the next Linux phone.

Fortunately, all of these conditions are changing, and I believe that there is now the possibility that Linux could finally become a viable alternative to Google’s Android and Apple’s iOS in the mobile space, just like desktop Linux has become a viable alternative to Windows and Mac OSX on the PC over the last three decades. This isn’t to say that mobile Linux will fundamentally challenge the business of Google or Apple, but the conditions are ripe for a small market to arise for Linux phones, similar to the way that people can currently buy Linux PCs from a number of small companies, such as TUXEDO, System76, Purism, Slimbook, ThinkPenguin, Ubuntushop.biz, Entroware, Star Labs, Juno, Laptop with Linux, Linux Certified, ArkPC, etc.

↫ Amos B. Batto

I’m not quite as optimistic as Batto, and that’s almost exclusively down to how running Android applications through compatibility layers will remain an absolute necessity for anyone trying to use one of these Linux smartphones today. As long as crucial applications and services required to function in a modern society, like banking, messaging, government services, and so on, require the use of an Android application when using a Linux smartphone, I just don’t think any significant number of people will be switching over.

What’s needed is something that will force these crucial services to become available on platforms other than Android and iOS, since I don’t think any of them will do so of their own volition. The only way I can see this happening is if the European Union, spurred on by our desire to reduce our dependence on adversarial US companies, mandates that several services marked as crucial must make themselves available on platforms other than Android and iOS.

I doubt that will happen, but I honestly don’t see Linux smartphones becoming anything more than a mere curiosity you fiddle with at home, while carrying an Android phone or iPhone as your actual phone.

LineageOS 24, based on Android 17, released [OSnews]

LineageOS has released its first version based on Android 17 – earlier than expected.

We’ve been hard at work rebasing all of our changes and features since Android 17’s release in June. Android 17’s first release mainly contained iterative improvements and some UI/UX refinements, but due to our previous efforts adapting to Google’s heavy refactoring over the last several versions, we were able to rebase onto Android 17’s code-base faster than anticipated. Yes you read that right: We’re early this year!

↫ LineageOS’ changelog written by Nolen Johnson

This release also includes the latest Android security patches (October 2026), as well as a brand new browser-based USB flash tool to make installation easier. Many of the applications included with LineageOS have also been updated and improved, like its music player, image editor, web browser, and so on. The project also did a full accessibility audit of its installation process and application suite, which has already resulted in severalk accessibility improvements.

LineageOS serves as the base for countless custom Android ROMs, so it’s great to see the project do this well.

Keyboard differences between Windows and Macs [OSnews]

Over the years, I learned about many gotchas and strange differences between keyboard handling on Mac and Windows – pertinent especially to web apps, which use the same codebase to cater to both. I thought it might be helpful to someone if I compile them all in one place.

↫ Marcin Wichary

I knew most of these, but it’s still nice to have such a reference at hand when needed.

16:21

FBI Arrests Suspect in FBI-Hacking Case [Schneier on Security]

In September, hackers from a group called ShinyHunters announced that they stole a trove of FBI data about its own agents. It was an intelligence disaster.

Last week, the FBI arrested (alternate link) someone associated with that crime.

15:42

Link [Scripting News]

I'm still on my sabatical from working with Claude re Frontier, but have now started working with Claude on FeedLand, and another project, not yet named, experimental, might never see the light of day. Yesterday I worked on FeedLand and have a fix for the problem that showed up in signing on to feedland.com. It's been sitting there for quite a while. I have some mostly small fixes in mind for FeedLand, that will allow it to hook into other apps more easily, esp via WebSockets, the mostly unexplored developer superpower. The difference is I'm going slowly and carefully. Everything in my system now is new. New computer, screen, and my main writing tool for code and docs -- Frontier. And I know the heavy lifting can be done by Claude. That is Claude's superpower.

Link [Scripting News]

In Manhattan, I lived on 57th St and Eighth Ave. Best location. The Columbus Circle subway station is under the building. Whole Foods a block away. Three Starbucks one block or less from the apartment (one was on 58th on the same block). Central Park has a six mile bike-only road (at least that's how bikers view it) and down the hill there's a much longer path along the Hudson River. Everywhere you look, a skyscraper is going up. Two were visible from my 50th floor window. New York is an amazing city because it can start up a huge gravity-defying construction project with almost no impact on the surrounding area. If I didn't know where to look I'd never see it. One of the biggest industries in the city is building the city. It's never finished. That's the way good software is too. And we just got a whole new tool for software construction, and it's like nothing we've ever had before.

DIY Disasters [George Monbiot]

Instead of taking responsibility, the government is passing crucial resilience roles to the public, and failure is inevitable.

By George Monbiot, published in the Guardian 8th October 2026

Would you mind fixing the NHS? And while you’re at it, could you please build an anti-missile system in your garden? Then regulate the banks, replace the water mains, tax the very rich and use the proceeds to rebuild our schools. Well, come on people: what are you waiting for?

I exaggerate, but this isn’t very far from the approach taken by the government’s Prepare campaign. Crucial functions, way beyond the scope of individual action, are dumped on our doorsteps while those in power fail to act. As a result, our national resilience is arguably lower than at any time since the second world war. At the Labour conference last week, Andy Burnham promised “a Britain where people feel the country has got their back again”. To make good on that pledge, he will have to change almost everything.

It’s not that the advice offered by Prepare – a government campaign designed to promote readiness for emergencies – is irrational. But when the state is absent or working against us, households and communities cannot fill the gap. The campaign tells us, for example, to conserve water during droughts by turning off the tap while brushing teeth, or taking a shower instead of a bath. For sure. Every citizen should do their duty. But the government has at the same time declared datacentres “nationally significant infrastructure projects” that can be forced through the planning system, despite two startling facts. The first is that even Water UK – the body representing those paragons of environmental responsibility the water companies – has said there isn’t enough water to support the new datacentres. The second is that, as a freedom of information response reveals, the government has no idea what they are being used for. You could be turning off your taps so the water can be used to nudify celebrities.

Talking of droughts, the government’s National Risk Register seems seriously out of whack. It estimates the risk of a drought with a moderate impact occurring in the next five years at just 0.2-1%. What?? It also estimates the risk of heatwaves with a “significant” impact – by which it means between 200 and 1,000 deaths – at only 1-5% over the next five years. The government estimates there were 2,877 heat-associated excess deaths in England during this year’s hot weather in May and June. There were a similar number of deaths in the heatwave of 2022.

But never mind: the Prepare campaign advises that “if you live in a home that is more likely to overheat … contact your local council, your letting agency or Citizens Advice to find out what help and support they can provide”. Good luck with that. In the meantime, the “future homes standard” is at last due to come into force in March 2028, but thanks to lobbying by the building sector, according to some practitioners it still won’t deliver new homes matched to the climate challenges we face. And local authorities have been blocked from demanding anything better, thanks to the same corporate pressure.

Survive floods, the Prepare campaign tells us, by “packing a ‘grab bag’ of essentials in advance”, moving “valuable items upstairs” and making “changes to your property to reduce the damage flooding can do”. But one in nine new homes are being built in areas at risk of flooding according to data from Aviva, and a recent high court judgment reveals that the law prevents local authorities from blocking such developments, even if they fail a crucial safety test.

These are not the starkest examples of public exhortation colliding with government failure. The Prepare campaign tells us to help stop the spread of avian flu by washing hands “with soap and water” after feeding wild birds. Fine. But at the same time, at the behest of lobbyists, the government is pushing a “poultry sector growth plan”. This will multiply the number of super-incubators of avian flu: namely the factory farms rearing chickens. As the Scientific Task Force on Avian Influenza and Wild Birds points out, poultry farms are where highly pathogenic bird flu first arose. Through their growth and intensification, the spreading of their manure on fields and its runoff into rivers, we could scarcely devise a better formula for generating new variants of the virus and the attendant ecological disasters. Oh hang on, we could: the shooting industry is still allowed to breed tens of millions of pheasants and partridges in similar conditions each year, then release them into the countryside to mingle with wild birds. But do wash your hands.

You’re also advised to “reduce your exposure to air pollution”. How? The government is allowing new homes to be equipped with wood-burning stoves, building huge and pointless new roads and consulting on radically delaying the transition to all-electric vehicles. All, once again, in response to lobbying.

As for food resilience, the Prepare campaign scarcely mentions it, except to say we should stock some “non-perishable food that doesn’t need cooking” in our homes. Last week, a group of anonymous senior food executives warned that, in the face of “material reductions in yield, quality and reliability of supply”, their industry was “defaulting to quick-fix crisis management” rather than taking a strategic, long-term approach. “At present, we are seeing companies either consistently lobby against necessary regulations or stay silent,” they said. The result is a likely failure to address an existential threat.

There was much in Burnham’s speech that delighted me, especially his listing of deregulation as one of the five great evils putting Britain on “the wrong path”. That’s a break with 47 years of policy, in which all governments have dismissed essential public protections as “red tape” that must be cut. The Tories were still at it in their own conference this week – telling us, in effect, they are here to burn it all down. But, like Keir Starmer, Burnham has tied his own hands by pledging to “stick to our fiscal rules”. These rules did not come from government. They were developed by Westminster junktanks and pushed into being by the media. As Larry Elliott has argued persuasively, they are unnecessary and self-defeating.

The threats to our resilience are the same as the threats to our democracy: what Burnham called “that sense of the powers-that-be pulling against the people, not with them”. We’ve had five decades of lobbyists shaping policy, with devastating consequences for our ability to withstand crises. Willing to play our part as we may be, we cannot do the work of government.

www.monbiot.com

14:56

Maytham Alsudany: There's more to CSS for underlining [Planet Debian]

I read Ruben Schade's notes on underlining and wanted to add more, as adding a border-bottom and leaving at that seemed incomplete to me.

Modern

Of course, you could just use the modern choice. Here, I've shortened what Schade uses into one line of CSS (because I can). As noted, this is a fairly new feature so not every browser supports this.

[This interactive/preview is only available on the website.]
.underline-me {
        text-decoration: underline red solid 3px;
}

Workarounds

Since some browsers don't support text-decoration, here are the alternatives I could think of.

border-bottom

The workaround Schade describes is using border-bottom, though it has a gap between the text in the line.

[This interactive/preview is only available on the website.]
I am <span class="underline-me">underlining this yap</span> within the sentence.
.underline-me {
        border-bottom: red solid 3px;
}

::after

Probably the better way is to create an ::after element, which gets very close, but displays above the text (covering the letters 'g' and 'y').

[This interactive/preview is only available on the website.]
I am <span class="underline-me">underlining this yap</span> within the sentence.
.underline-me {
        position: relative;
}
.underline-me::after {
        content: '';
        position: absolute;
        width: 100%;
        height: 3px;
        background-color: red;
        left: 0;
        bottom: 2px;
}

::after in a container

If you use a container (in this case, two nested <span>s instead of just one), then you can get very close with the underline displaying below the text.

[This interactive/preview is only available on the website.]
I am
<span class="underline-me-ctn">
        <span class="underline-me">underlining this yap</span>
</span>
within the sentence.
.underline-me-ctn {
        position: relative;
}
.underline-me {
        z-index: 10;
        position: relative;
}
.underline-me-ctn::after {
        content: '';
        position: absolute;
        width: 100%;
        height: 3px;
        background-color: red;
        left: 0;
        bottom: 2px;
}

::after in a container with text stroke

And now if you add a stroke to the text via -webkit-text-stroke, you're pretty much there, though this may not be feasible in some situations (e.g. gradient or image background behind the text). Support for -webkit-text-stroke is not that much better than text-decoration though, so make of that what you will.

[This interactive/preview is only available on the website.]
I am
<span class="underline-me-ctn">
        <span class="underline-me-outline">underlining this yap</span>
        <span class="underline-me">underlining this yap</span>
</span>
within the sentence.
.underline-me-ctn {
        position: relative;
}
.underline-me-outline {
        z-index: 5;
        position: absolute;
        left: 0;
        color: var(--background);
        -webkit-text-stroke: 0.3em var(--background);
}
.underline-me {
        z-index: 10;
        position: relative;
}
.underline-me-ctn::after {
        content: '';
        position: absolute;
        width: 100%;
        height: 3px;
        background-color: red;
        left: 0;
        bottom: 2px;
}

14:49

LineageOS 24 released [LWN.net]

The LineageOS project, which produces an Android-based distribution for mobile devices, has announced the release of LineageOS 24.0.

We're a bit sentimental about this release, as it precedes a really fun upcoming milestone.

On December 24, 2026, LineageOS will celebrate 10 years. It's a remarkable milestone for a project built by a passionate community of developers, maintainers, contributors, and users who have kept so many devices alive along the way.

[...] We've been hard at work rebasing all of our changes and features since Android 17's release in June. Android 17's first release mainly contained iterative improvements and some UI/UX refinements, but due to our previous efforts adapting to Google's heavy refactoring over the last several versions, we were able to rebase onto Android 17's code-base faster than anticipated. Yes you read that right: We're early this year!

14:21

First Impressions: Dell XPS Googlebook and the Googlebook OS [Whatever]

As someone who has, over the years, found himself deep in the Google ecosystem of hardware and services, I had been curious about the Googlebook concept for a while — whether it would be basically a fancy Chromebook, or if it would offer something more, and more useful, than that line of affordable but mostly limited laptops. When the Googlebook models were announced in September, I decided to go ahead and pre-order one: The Acer Googlebook 14.

It turns out, however, that apparently lots of people had the same idea as me. Best Buy sent me an email telling me that despite taking my pre-order money, the Acer was out of stock and they didn’t know when they would get more. I cancelled that order and went with the Dell XPS Googlebook instead, which, I think by virtue of being $100 more expensive than the Acer, was in stock. It arrived the day after I ordered it — and when, alas, I was away at New York Comic Con for a few days. I finally got a chance to set it up and play with it yesterday.

My first impressions: It’s pretty nice! Also, Google still has work to do on its shiny new operating system.

Hardware first: The XPS Googlebook is a really nice little laptop. It’s physically the smallest of the five Googlebooks available at launch (the other four coming from Acer, Asus, Hewlett-Packard and Lenovo). It’s clearly meant to be in the “ultrabook” category of laptop, which is to say, light and thin and not terribly concerned with ports (it comes with two USB-C ports and that’s it — not even a headphone jack). It’s also the only Googlebook at launch that does not come with an OLED screen, although the screen it has is perfectly nice and the blacks are certainly inky enough for government work.

All of the launch Googlebooks were required by Google to have certain minimum hardware: at least 16GB of RAM, high-speed processors, either by Intel or Qualcomm (the XPS comes with a Snapdragon X Elite), 512GB SSD, a metal, not plastic, chassis, backlit keyboard, and a touchscreen with a high refresh rate (120 Hz here). None of this comes cheap these days, and the initial set of Googlebooks are priced between $899 and $1299, with the XPS I got coming in at $999. This is more expensive than just about any Chromebook, more expensive than the new Macbook Neo, and on par with a newish Macbook Air.

The minimum requirements pay off, at least for the XPS. It feels really solid for such a small computer, and everything about it looks and feels nice. The keyboard has a nice snap to it and has almost no flex, the screen as mentioned is very good (and comes with an anti-glare coating, which is a feature I appreciate now that I have it), and while it has fans, which turned on while I was setting up the laptop, they are quiet and barely noticeable when they’re on, which so far has only been during that setup.

As mentioned the processor here is a Snapdragon chip rather than an Intel one, and that’s fine because Android (which the Googlebook OS is based on, and which, frankly, it’s mostly just a reskinned version of) is designed to run on ARM chips, which Snapdragon is. Everything runs quickly so far, and ARM chips are typically meant to be more efficient than x86 chips like Intel’s, although so far the battery life I’ve seen out of the XPS is good but not amazing.

The XPS has quirks — the keyboard is a modified Chromebook set-up, which means the Caps button is a “search” button first (you can make it a Caps button by holding down the shift button, which defeats the whole purpose of a caps button), and there’s a “Google” button on the bottom row which opens an app drawer or can be used to access the “magic pointer” (more on that later). Also, the speakers, while perfectly acceptable, make the chassis vibrate, particularly the trackpad, which is a not entirely pleasant feeling. The trackpad is mechanical, not haptic, and the click does take some pressure (it responds to taps perfectly well). The I/O situation as mentioned is sparse, but inasmuch as I already have a MacBook Air, which also only has two USB-C ports, I am already well-acquainted with the dongle life, and I have bluetooth headphones. I’m not going to give the XPS too much crap for that.

So as a piece of hardware, the XPS is solid. Now, how is the software — the Googlebook operating system and all the “AI” bells and whistles that Google has piled on top of it?

Well…

As a preface, I should note that I knew going into this that as an early adopter of this platform, I would essentially be a beta tester for it, since almost no 1.0 release of anything survives its first encounter with users out in the world. In the week since Googlebooks have hit the market there have already been updates to the OS to fix bugs and other flubs. So I’m okay with having a little patience in this shake-down cruise. That said, being patient doesn’t mean not pointing out the flaws that do currently exist.

One of those flaws is that at the moment the Googlebook is doing a crap job at one of its marquee features, namely, integration with Android phones, where one is supposed to be able to connect laptop and phone seamlessly, stream apps from the phone to the laptop, hand off work from one to the other, and drop files from one into the other painlessly. As a Pixel phone owner, this promised integration was a huge inducement to try out the Googlebook — I wanted what (presumably) iPhone users have with their Macs. It would, in fact, be really useful. And as a Pixel owner running Android 17, I am someone best positioned to get that integration right out of the box.

Except that the Googlebook keeps dropping its connection to my phone and not being able to find it after that, unless I restart both the phone and the Googlebook. It happens when I take my phone away from the laptop and/or close the laptop, breaking the connection between the two. A short disconnect doesn’t seem to be a problem; a longer one seems to flummox it entirely. I believe this is a known issue that’s being addressed, so that’s good. But it’s still annoying right now. I don’t want to have to keep resetting my laptop and phone to get the promised integration.

(I’ve also noticed that phone apps streamed onto the Googlebook can have choppy scrolling, although I don’t know if that’s a problem with the integration or an artifact of my occasionally-janky internet connection.)

That said, when the integration does work, it’s pretty neat, and I see it being really useful when I’m working on my laptop and need something from my phone, or want to access an app that I don’t have running natively on my computer. As mentioned already, the Googlebook OS is pretty much a reskinned version of Android 17, so all the apps that run on an Android phone should run just fine on the laptop (there are apps that apparently struggle on the Intel Googlebooks, but even there something like 97% of apps run perfectly well). During the setup, if you pair your Googlebook with your phone it will install the apps you have there over to the laptop, so you’ll be able to run them natively even if you can’t access your phone. But they are different instances of the app, so streaming an app might still come in handy.

So: Great in concept! Execution still needs work.

Google is going all in on “AI” integration on the Googlebooks, making sure that Gemini, its in-house “AI,” is only a click, button-mash or cursor wiggle away, the latter being the “magic pointer” feature. You can invoke Gemini and ask it about what’s on your screen, or have it smoosh two images you have into a single “AI”-ified picture and so on (the Googlebooks also come with an offer for an entire year of the “Pro” level of Gemini, which comes with five terabytes of cloud storage, which is arguably more useful). The point is, no matter where you go on the Googlebook OS, Gemini is right there, lurking, waiting for you to do something with it.

I’m not going to get into a deep discussion about the various issues with “AI” for this overview; if you want to know my current(ish) feelings about it, you can go here and catch up. What I will say is that at this point Microsoft, Apple and Google are all jamming as much “AI” as they possibly can into their operating systems, so if you want an entirely “AI”-free compute experience, you’ll probably need to head to some distribution of Linux or another — and that’s a totally valid choice if you do, maybe this will finally be The Year of Linux after all. But I suspect most normies will stay in the MSFT/Apple/Google universes, so the question there is: If one must be stuck with “AI” festooned about one’s computing life, which version is the most useful.

I think at the moment it’s Google that has best integrated its “AI” features into its ecosystem as a useful tool and not just a shiny bauble to rook the rubes. Microsoft, of course, fucked up its Copilot integration so badly that now it’s pretending it never even happened, while Apple’s “AI” was so famously flubbed over such a long period that its latest iteration of “Apple Intelligence” is just Gemini in a black turtleneck. There is some irony in Google being better than Apple at both tech and UI with anything, but here we are. 2026 is a hell of year.

For all that, even in my brief experience of the Googlebook OS, there’s nothing here that demands Gemini use. It’s around, to be sure. Oh, boy, is it ever. But you don’t really have to use it for anything. You can access apps and do your work without ever having to invoke Gemini. Yes, it can make little widgets for you, or vibe code something for you, or take a picture of your cat and put a witch hat on it for spooky season or whatever. Or, you could just leave it alone and never bother with it, and your Googlebook experience will be just fine without Gemini.

And in fact, of all the things that Gemini is supposed to do on the Googlebook, there is only one feature that I actually find useful in any measure: Rambler. It’s the new voice dictation program that takes all the “ums” and “ahs” out of your speech when you are doing voice-to-text, and creates a coherent statement that requires minimal editing on the backend. It’s been super useful when I’m trying to plow through a whole bunch of email, and it’s easier to say something than to type something. It’s the one thing out of basically years of Google “AI” that I think actually earns its keep. It’s not exclusive to Googlebook — it’s on Pixel phones as well — but it’s especially useful in the laptop milieu. Also, Rambler seems like to me it could be a really excellent accessibility feature, although I would need other more knowledgeable people in that area to confirm that.

Having discussed the hardware and the software, the question now is: Is a Googlebook actually useful — as in, is it a laptop that could replace your Mac or Windows laptop?

Ehhhhh… maybe? But probably not?

While the Googlebook is substantially more useful and capable than a Chromebook, it suffers from the same issue that Chromebooks did: Some significant programs are just not there, or aren’t fully featured. Again, think of Googlebooks as Android laptops. They have access to everything in the Google Play Store, which is actually pretty great — but not everything in the Google Play Store is a feature-complete version of that software. The Android version of Word, which I use to write novels, isn’t close to feature-complete, nor is the Web browser version. The Android version of Photoshop isn’t feature-complete either (nor again is the Web browser version). I can write in Android’s Word, and I can do some photo editing in Android’s Photoshop. But substantive detail work is out of reach. If there’s software you need the feature-complete version for, and need it on a regular or daily basis, then the Googlebook is probably not for you, at least not yet.

But, if most of the things you do can be done through phone apps or the browser, and/or you’re deep into the Google ecosystem (and use, for example, Google’s suite of business apps instead of Microsoft’s), and you’re willing to tolerate Google working the kinks out of its new operating system on you for the next several months, then, actually, yeah, it’s worth taking a look at the Googlebook. I can personally see taking this with me when I’m traveling, when I’m not doing a huge amount of work and therefore my need for feature-complete programs is at a minimum. I did this before with my Chromebooks, and this XPS is a lot more robust, both in terms of hardware and software, than those ever were.

(If you’re porting over from a Chromebook, or porting over, say, your tech-unsavvy mom or dad from that platform, then this is a very good, if currently slightly expensive, upgrade to that experience. Be aware that Google is promising to support Chromebooks through 2034, and presumably later generations of Googlebooks will have cheaper options, so there’s not a huge rush at the moment to move over to a Googlebook.)

Plus, again, Rambler really is a killer app. I genuinely see me using my Googlebook to plow through emails and doing other things where dictation would be faster and better than typing. It’s not for writing fiction or long-form pieces like this, I would note; that takes a part of my brain that’s better integrated with my hands, and yes, that’s a real thing. But really short pieces, social media and emails? Absolutely. I’ll be happy to save my wrists for the things that make me money. This is one part of living in the future I think is worth it.

— JS

14:07

Security updates for Monday [LWN.net]

Security updates have been issued by AlmaLinux (cjose, compat-openssl10, compat-openssl11, curl, dogtag-pki, dovecot, emacs, glibc, kernel, openssl, python3.12, python3.14, and sssd), Debian (chromium, ghostscript, tor, and vips), Fedora (kernel, libical, markdownlint-cli2, openbao, openvpn, php-getid3, python3.10, python3.11, and python3.13), Mageia (capnproto, chirp, flatpak, freetype2, hamlib, mingw-pcre2, pcre2, openssl, tomcat, tomcat-native, and xdg-dbus-proxy), Oracle (bind, cjose, dogtag-pki, dovecot, firefox, kernel, nodejs:24, openssl, pki-core:10.6, python3.12, python3.14, ruby:2.5, rust-sequoia-sq, sssd, and tftp), Red Hat (libxml2), Slackware (mutt), SUSE (apache-sshd, bind, ccache, chromium, cpp13, dash, expat, fetchmail, flatpak, golang-github-prometheus-prometheus, grafana, system-user-grafana, incus, libpng16-16, libsoup, logback, openssh8.4, perl-DBI, php8, python3-paramiko, python312, python313-asyncpg, python313-azure-identity, python313-Babel, python313-Beaker, python313-bjoern, python313-black, python313-Brotli, python313-CairoSVG, python313-Flask-Cors, python313-FontTools, python313-Jinja2, python313-jwcrypto, python313-MechanicalSoup, python313-oauthlib, python313-PyJWT, python313-PyMySQL, python313-PyYAML, python313-virtualenv, python313-XStatic-jquery-ui, qemu, rsyslog, shadowsocks-rust, squid, stunnel, swtpm, trivy, unbound, wpa_supplicant, and yast2-users), and Ubuntu (libdbi-perl).

13:21

Pluralistic: How labor rights rescued Ultima from a monopolist (12 Oct 2026) [Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow]

->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->-> Top Sources: None -->

Today's links

  • How labor rights rescued Ultima from a monopolist: If you care about labor justice and artists' rights, stop focusing on copyright.
  • Hey look at this: Delights to delectate.
  • Object permanence: China unblocks Wikipedia; CCC cracks the Bundestrojaner; "Children of the Sky"; "Messy"; Every top Icelandic banker is guilty; Climate activism x digital activism; Gene Kan on P2P's future; Larry Ellison x mass surveillance; W3C v patents; "Work from home" in the cybercrime supply-chain; "Nursery Rhyme Comics"; Glitchy tea-set; Tourist Guy; Vista v reinstallation; Ryanair v your bladder; Wells Fargo CEO loves "sales culture"; "Attention Merchants"; Orban v free press; AI v GIGO; Dylan wins the Nobel; India's starving kids app; Adobe's spyware copyfraud; Charter blackmails customers with bad credit threats; Fix UK housing.
  • Upcoming appearances: Paris, Vancouver, Victoria, Ottawa, Kilkenny, Sheffield, Oxford, Montreal.
  • Recent appearances: Where I've been.
  • Latest books: You keep readin' em, I'll keep writin' 'em.
  • Upcoming books: Like I said, I'll keep writin' 'em.
  • Colophon: All the rest.



A heavy, medieval, ornate brass door with a lion's head in the center and a handle carved as an elaborate winged figure. The lion's eyes have been replaced with dizzy spirals. The head of the winged figure on the handle has been replaced with an 8-bit Ultima avatar's head. The handle center and ring have been altered to add a series of copyright symbols to them. The trim of the door has been worked with the Ultima Online logo. A keyhole set beneath the handle shows a distant pixelated lich sprite from an early Ultima game.

How labor rights rescued Ultima from a monopolist (permalink)

If you work in the media, you have doubtless had a lifetime of encouragement to treat copyright as your primary source of economic protection, and doubtless you've been told that this protection arises from the fact that copyright is a property right – specifically, it's a subspecies of "intellectual property":

https://locusmag.com/feature/cory-doctorow-ip/

Property rights are capitalism's holy sacrament, so of course, it's natural to treasure any property right you can lay claim to. But this is a trap. Creative workers aren't asset speculators, we're workers. When we bargain with a media company to sell them our copyright, we're just bargaining to sell our labor, not our property.

This is a distinction with a difference. Property rights are alienable. When you negotiate to sell your property to someone else, you propose to transfer the title to that property. If you sell your house, you don't get to move back in if you change your mind later. Sell your car, and you must not get in and drive it away.

Nominally, creative workers only bargain away some of their copyright, because copyright is also divisible. You can sell US English print rights to a novel, a one-month license to synch a song to an advertisement, or the right to display a painting for a year.

But here's the thing about property rights: the most reliable predictor of how many property rights you must give up in a sale isn't how many property rights you started with – it's how much bargaining power you have. For 50 years, governments have expanded copyright in every way, making it last longer, cover more works and restrict more uses, all backstopped by ever-steepening penalties. 50 years later, media companies – our bosses – are larger and more profitable than they've ever been, and we're poorer than we've ever been. The share of the money generated by our labor has declined, even as our rights over the product of that labor have expanded.

How to make sense of this? It's easy, once you factor in power. In a world of five publishers, four studios, three labels, two app companies and a single ebook/audiobook company, getting more copyright to bargain with just means getting more copyright to bargain away. When copyright's term expanded from "life plus 50 years" to "life plus 70 years," our bosses simply demanded the entirety of the new term, and didn't offer us a dime more.

This is the thesis of Chokepoint Capitalism, the book on Big Tech, Big Media, and creative labor markets Rebecca Giblin and I published in 2022:

https://www.beacon.org/Chokepoint-Capitalism-P2020.aspx

Chokepoint Capitalism is broken into two parts: the first half of the book is a series of pitiless, plain-language dissections of the baroque scams that media companies have used to make themselves richer from our work, from Spotify to Amazon to Livenation and beyond. From reader feedback, I can tell you that these chapters will make you very angry, because once you strip away all the deliberate obfuscation, all you're left with is one screw-job after another, each of which makes the creators you love poorer even as you pay more for their work.

But then there's the second half of the book. This section is devoted to "shovel-ready" policy solutions, each of which is designed to change the "distribution" of the spoils of the media industry, putting more money in workers' pockets at the expense of our bosses. None of these are things you can do as a "conscious consumer." The monopolistic destruction of creators' livelihoods is a systemic problem and you can't solve it by shopping better.

The point of these chapters is to lay out what we must demand from our policymakers when (inevitably), they propose to "solve" the problem of worsening straits for creative workers – and to help creative workers understand that when our bosses demand more copyright, that's not there to benefit us.

One of these systemic solutions is "termination of transfer," a simple and radical idea that has a proven track-record of making creative workers richer at our bosses' expense. Simply put, "termination of transfer" is the statutory right to void any contract you've signed to transfer your copyright to someone else. In the USA, the 1976 Copyright Act introduced a 35-year termination right. 35 years after you sign any copyright contract, you can file some paperwork with the US Copyright Office and get that copyright back, no matter what your contract says.

Now, most creative works don't have a commercial life after 35 years (very few works are commercially viable even after the original US copyright term of 14 years), but for those that do, termination of transfer is a reliable way to address the extremely common situation in which a creator signs away their rights for a low price, not knowing that it will become a lasting hit. Once you've scored that hit, you can probably get a better deal from your next work, but the deal for that hit is done and can't be altered.

Termination solves this. From The Babysitters Club to the early Stephen King novels to George Clinton's entire catalog, termination of transfer has put lots of money into creative workers' pockets at the expense of corporations that ripped them off at the start of their careers.

From the start, there was no question whether termination of transfer would make it into Chokepoint Capitalism. Rebecca is one of the world's leading experts on the subject, having co-authored the definitive study of termination:

https://pluralistic.net/2021/09/26/take-it-back/

In the book, we note that – unlike longer copyright terms – termination has a proven track record of putting groceries on creators' tables, braces on their kids' teeth, and a roof over their heads. We go over the legislative history of termination in the 1976 Act, noting that it was originally supposed to be automatic and kick in after just 20 years. If we want to make creative workers richer, changing the 35-year administrative right into an automatic 20-year termination right is a no-brainer amendment to copyright law.

How did an automatic right that kicked in after 20 years turn into a right you have to apply for after 35 years? Simple: our bosses hate termination. How much do they hate it? Well, take Mitch Glazier, the head of the Recording Industry Association of America, where he draws a $1.3m annual salary to represent the record labels.

Before Glazier got the RIAA gig, he was an obscure Congressional staffer, but he was forced out of the job after he snuck a clause into an otherwise unrelated bill that killed termination of transfer for recording artists. This was so outrageous that Congress actually convened a special session so they could rip out Glazier's amendment, and Glazier got a new job as a millionaire lobbyist for the recording industry:

https://pluralistic.net/2026/03/03/its-a-trap-2/#inheres-at-the-moment-of-fixation

Termination is hugely useful and quite radical. Last year saw Gary K Wolf, creator of the novel Who Censored Roger Rabbit? (later adapted by Disney as Who Framed Roger Rabbit?) claw back his rights to the book and its characters, in order to continue the series:

https://pluralistic.net/2025/11/18/im-not-bad/#im-just-drawn-that-way

In 2023, Bill Willingham terminated the transfer of his wildly successful graphic novel series Fables from DC and released the copyright into the public domain:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/09/15/fairy-use-tales/#sampling-license

And now, Richard Garriott, AKA "Lord British," has claimed back the rights to the groundbreaking Ultima series of computer role-playing games, which he sold to Electronic Arts in 1992:

https://www.videogameschronicle.com/news/richard-garriott-is-officially-regaining-control-of-the-ultima-series/

On the Techjess podcast, Garriott marveled at how easy the process was: "there’s a really weird United States copyright law that says if you are the original holder of a copyright and you assign it or sell it to any publisher or any other entity, after 35 years, you can just take it back":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2El7VtPuSzs

EA killed off Ultima in 2000, and it has languished since, despite an ardent fandom. Garriott has vowed to reissue the old games and is mulling new ones.

All this brings me back to property rights. Property rights are uniquely unsuitable to this kind of arrangement. You don't get to move back into the house your parents sold 35 years ago, and if you did, the photographer who took the family portrait in the hallway wouldn't be allowed to break in and take it away 35 years after you sat for it.

Termination of transfer isn't an "IP right" – it's a labor right. It belongs to the large class of rights that are far more important and useful than mere property rights, such as privacy rights and human rights:

https://pluralistic.net/2026/09/28/cost-of-everything/#value-of-nothing

If copyright were just about property rights, then termination of transfer would be inconceivable. Termination is a vestigial labor right at the very periphery of copyright. It protects artists, and it can only do so because it is not a property right.

This is one of the themes in The Bezzle, my 2024 historical technothriller, starring my two-fisted forensic accountant hero Martin Hench who uses termination to help an artist claw back his rights from an unscrupulous former manager who forged his signature decades before (this plotline is based on the true story of Parliament/Funkadelic's George Clinton!):

https://craphound.com/bezzle/

If you signed away your rights 35 years ago and want to get them back, check out the Authors Alliance, a nonprofit whose advisory board I volunteer for. We produced a tool that automates all the hardest parts of terminating your transfers and getting your rights back:

https://www.authorsalliance.org/resources/termination-of-transfer/

Some of our most ardent fans are academics, whose publicly funded papers are published in journals dominated by a cartel of giant companies that do not pay the authors, nor the editors, nor the reviewers, but still claim all rights and charge the institutions that funded the research they publish tens of thousands of dollars per journal to access that research:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/08/16/the-public-sphere/#not-the-elsevier

But it's not just academics who have an interest in termination of transfer. It's video game authors, novelists, musicians – and maybe you, someday!

(Image: Reda Kerbouche, CC BY-SA 4.0; Thegreenj, CC BY-SA 3.0, modified)


Hey look at this (permalink)



A shelf of leatherbound history books with a gilt-stamped series title, 'The World's Famous Events.'

Object permanence (permalink)

#25yrsago Tourist Guy https://web.archive.org/web/20011009234007/http://www.touristofdeath.com/

#25yrsago Gene Kan on Open Web Services https://web.archive.org/web/20011031234135/http://www.openp2p.com/pub/a/p2p/2001/08/02/openservices.html

#25yrsago Larry Ellison wants to spy on everyone https://web.archive.org/web/20011206002725/http://www.oracle.com/corporate/index.html?digitalid_comp.html

#25yrsago W3C ponders patents in web standards https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-patentpolicy-comment/2001Oct/1488.html

#25yrsago Adobe updates the ebook reader that Syklarov cracked https://web.archive.org/web/20011107145015/http://www.vnunet.com/News/1126057

#20yrsago Hungarian airport proposes “nonremovable” RFIDs for every passenger http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6044310.stm

#20yrsago China unblocks Wikipedia, even though it won’t censor https://web.archive.org/web/20061016133232/http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/departments/online/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003251388

#20yrsago Eudora going open source, to be based on Thunderbird https://web.archive.org/web/20061014163143/http://www.qualcomm.com/press/releases/2006/061011_project_collaboration_mozilla.html

#20yrsago Vista license only lets you reinstall your OS on new PCs twice https://web.archive.org/web/20061022161256/http://www.techweb.com/wire/software/193300234

#15yrsago Why handmade keys? https://makezine.com/article/maker-news/rebuilt-keys-jimmy-diresta/

#15yrsago Ryanair declares war on bodily fluids, vows to remove toilets https://www.the-independent.com/travel/news-and-advice/ryanair-unveils-its-latest-plan-to-save-money-remove-toilets-from-the-plane-2369232.html

#15yrsago Comic about the complexity and decline of copyright https://web.archive.org/web/20111014201558/http://www.mediademocracyfund.org/about/mdf-voices/appropriart-a-graphic-about-copyright-susie-cagle-co-produced-mdf-and-gia

#15yrsago Chaos Computer Club cracks Germany’s illegal government malware, a trojan that spies on your PC and lets anyone off the street hijack it https://www.ccc.de/en/updates/2011/staatstrojaner

#15yrsago Vernor Vinge’s Children of the Sky: bootstrapping high-tech civilization from hive-mind Machiavellis https://memex.craphound.com/2011/10/11/vernor-vinges-children-of-the-sky-bootstrapping-high-tech-civilization-from-hive-mind-machiavellis/

#15yrsago Facebook’s misleading “log out” button and the future of privacy legislation https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/10/facebook’s-hotel-california-cross-site-tracking-and-potential-impact-digital-privacy

#15yrsago How online crooks use “work from home” patsies to launder goods and forward them offshore https://krebsonsecurity.com/2011/10/shady-reshipping-centers-exposed-part-i/

#15yrsago Nursery Rhyme Comics: Great comic illustrators do Mother Goose https://memex.craphound.com/2011/10/12/nursery-rhyme-comics-great-comic-illustrators-do-mother-goose/

#15yrsago 3D printed “glitchy” tea-set https://www.plummerfernandez.com/works/glitch-reality/

#10yrsago Meet the WWI women who pretended to be rocks for the war effort https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/why-women-pretended-to-be-creepy-rocks-and-trees-in-nyc-parks-during-wwi

#10yrsago Bernie Sanders’ touching video endorsing his brother’s candidacy for David Cameron’s old Parliamentary seat https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VAH8FJ3g49g

#10yrsago Messy: When automated anti-disaster systems make things worse, and what to do about it https://memex.craphound.com/2016/10/11/messy-when-automated-anti-disaster-systems-make-things-worse-and-what-to-do-about-it/

#10yrsago Icelandic Supreme Court: all nine top bankers are guilty of market manipulation https://icelandmonitor.mbl.is/news/politics_and_society/2016/10/06/iceland_finds_all_guilty_in_banker_market_abuse_cas/

#10yrsago When “reputation management” becomes perjury, forgery and fraud against America’s federal courts https://web.archive.org/web/20161011055317/https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2016/10/10/dozens-of-suspicious-court-cases-with-missing-defendants-aim-at-getting-web-pages-taken-down-or-deindexed/?utm_term=.379bd5b35a91

#10yrsago If you bail on Yahoo Mail, forget about having your email forwarded https://web.archive.org/web/20161012182945/https://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_TEC_YAHOO_BREACH?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULt

#10yrsago The clumsy, amateurish IoT botnet has now infected devices in virtually all of the world’s countries https://web.archive.org/web/20161012150926/https://motherboard.vice.com/read/internet-of-things-mirai-malware-reached-almost-all-countries-on-earth

#10yrsago Wells Fargo whistleblower: once I complained, they started denying me bathroom breaks https://web.archive.org/web/20161014180455/https://money.cnn.com/2016/10/11/investing/wells-fargo-intimidation-bathroom-breaks/index.html

#10yrsago The astounding story of Iceland’s constitution – and its government’s failure https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C1qk-BQwNlA

#10yrsago Wells Fargo’s new CEO previously denied that the bank’s sales culture had any problems https://web.archive.org/web/20161014023238/https://consumerist.com/2016/10/13/new-wells-fargo-ceo-recently-denied-overbearing-sales-culture-that-created-fake-account-fiasco/

#10yrsago The Attention Merchants: a deep dive into the origins of the surveillance economy https://memex.craphound.com/2016/10/13/the-attention-merchants-a-deep-dive-into-the-origins-of-the-surveillance-economy/

#10yrsago AI’s blind spot: garbage in, garbage out https://web.archive.org/web/20190429032014/https://www.nature.com/news/there-is-a-blind-spot-in-ai-research-1.20805

#10yrsago Hungary’s Prime Minister shuts down opposition press, then goes after everyone else https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/oct/13/hungary-future-europe-far-right-viktor-orban

#10yrsago Using the science of group conflict to understand Trump’s campaign https://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2016/10/12/trumps-brilliant-manipulation-of-the-science-of-group-conflict/

#10yrsago Bob Dylan is the first songwriter to win the Nobel Prize for literature https://www.csmonitor.com/Arts-Culture/Books/2016/1013/Bob-Dylan-lyrics-as-literature-First-songwriter-to-win-a-Nobel-Prize

#10yrsago Poland’s outrageous abortion law is back https://globalvoices.org/2016/10/13/new-abortion-ban-proposals-in-poland-mean-the-black-protest-movement-isnt-over-yet/

#10yrsago Hate crimes spike after Brexit https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-37640982

#5yrsago India funded a starving kids' app, but not food https://pluralistic.net/2021/10/13/theres-an-app-for-that/#solutionism

#5yrsago Adobe uses copyfraud to preserve spyware https://pluralistic.net/2021/10/13/theres-an-app-for-that/#gnash

#5yrsago Charter uses bad credit threats to corral ex-subscribers https://pluralistic.net/2021/10/13/theres-an-app-for-that/#thugs-charter

#1yrago The curious, intertwined history of climate and digital rights activism https://pluralistic.net/2025/10/11/cyber-rights-now/#better-late-than-never

#1yrago How to fix the UK housing crisis https://pluralistic.net/2025/10/13/castles-not-assets/#steve-keen


Upcoming appearances (permalink)

A photo of me onstage, giving a speech, pounding the podium.



A screenshot of me at my desk, doing a livecast.

Recent appearances (permalink)



A grid of my books with Will Stahle covers..

Latest books (permalink)



A cardboard book box with the Macmillan logo.

Upcoming books (permalink)

  • "The Post-American Internet," a geopolitical sequel of sorts to Enshittification, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2027
  • "Unauthorized Bread": a middle-grades graphic novel adapted from my novella about refugees, toasters and DRM, FirstSecond, April 20, 2027

  • "Enshittification, Why Everything Suddenly Got Worse and What to Do About It" (the graphic novel), Firstsecond, 2027

  • "The Memex Method," Farrar, Straus, Giroux, 2027



Colophon (permalink)

Today's top sources:

Currently writing:

  • “Once Is Enemy Action,” a science fiction novel about the origins of modern technofascism. Today's words: 562 (24528 total).

  • "The Post-American Internet," a sequel to "Enshittification," about the better world the rest of us get to have now that Trump has torched America. Fourth draft completed. Submitted to editor.

  • A Little Brother short story about DIY insulin PLANNING


This work – excluding any serialized fiction – is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. That means you can use it any way you like, including commercially, provided that you attribute it to me, Cory Doctorow, and include a link to pluralistic.net.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Quotations and images are not included in this license; they are included either under a limitation or exception to copyright, or on the basis of a separate license. Please exercise caution.


How to get Pluralistic:

Blog (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

Pluralistic.net

Newsletter (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

https://pluralistic.net/plura-list

Mastodon (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

https://mamot.fr/@pluralistic

Bluesky (no ads, possible tracking and data-collection):

https://bsky.app/profile/doctorow.pluralistic.net

Medium (no ads, paywalled):

https://doctorow.medium.com/

Tumblr (mass-scale, unrestricted, third-party surveillance and advertising):

https://mostlysignssomeportents.tumblr.com/tagged/pluralistic

"When life gives you SARS, you make sarsaparilla" -Joey "Accordion Guy" DeVilla

READ CAREFULLY: By reading this, you agree, on behalf of your employer, to release me from all obligations and waivers arising from any and all NON-NEGOTIATED agreements, licenses, terms-of-service, shrinkwrap, clickwrap, browsewrap, confidentiality, non-disclosure, non-compete and acceptable use policies ("BOGUS AGREEMENTS") that I have entered into with your employer, its partners, licensors, agents and assigns, in perpetuity, without prejudice to my ongoing rights and privileges. You further represent that you have the authority to release me from any BOGUS AGREEMENTS on behalf of your employer.

ISSN: 3066-764X

13:00

CodeSOD: A Type of Type Safety [The Daily WTF]

For some godawful reason, people like to explain object oriented concepts via analogy to biological taxonomies. I suppose it's easy to understand an "is-a" relationship (a cat is a mammal), but the down side is you get a complex and increasingly leaky analogy that over-emphasizes the importance of inheritance.

That's not to slight Alan's choice of using it to anoymize today's code. It's just a broad frustration on my part.

In any case, Alan has been working in a C++ codebase that's written by people who maybe don't fully understand all the key object oriented concepts. That's why you get code like this:

    /*
     * If possible, steal tentacle from the given animal.
     */
    void Animal::StealTentacle(Animal *animal) {
        // only Octopus and Squid can have tentacles
        if (!IS_INSTANCE_OF(this, Octopus) && !IS_INSTANCE_OF(this, Squid)) {
            return;
        }

        Limb *limb = animal->mLimbs->GetFirstTentacle();
        if (limb) {
            limb->AttachToAnimal(this);
            // . . .

This function takes a raw pointer to an Animal object. If that pointer is not an Octopus or a Squid, we bail. Otherwise, we're going to take its tentacle, and do stuff with it.

Now, this is a pretty clear example of the type switch anti-pattern. Instead of using the type system and polymorphism to enforce restrictions, we instead do runtime type checks.

But wait a second, what's going on in that IS_INSTANCE_OF?

    // I've noticed that dynamic_cast always returns a valid result when
    // casting an "objectPointer" of type "className".
    // Try casting it to a [Organism *] to force it to work. (?)
    #define IS_INSTANCE_OF(objectPointer, className)    ((bool) (dynamic_cast<className *>(((Organism *) objectPointer)) != NULL))
    #define IS_MEMBER_OF(objectPointer, className)      IS_INSTANCE_OF(objectPointer, className)    // temporary macro alias

This code attempts to take an objectPointer and first, force it into a pointer to our base type (Organism), using a C-style cast. Now, in C++, C-style casts are a shorthand, and the compiler will, based on the context, attempt to do the best cast which fits the situation, starting with a const_cast (which only alters the constness of the type), and failing all the way up to a reinterpret_cast- which just ignores type information entirely and assumes you know what you're doing.

Which this developer clearly doesn't.

In any case, we pass the C-style cast result into the dynamic_cast function, which attempts to cast that pointer into an instance of className. If no such conversion is possible (because they're not part of the same inheritance hiercharcy), it returns NULL, which is what they're checking.

Their comment highlights their misunderstanding of the function; dynamic_cast can be used to crosscast. In other words, dynamic_cast<Dog*>(my_cat) will actually work, because (in this example) Dog* and Cat* share a common base.

From the docs:

Otherwise, if expression points/refers to a public base class subobject of the most derived object, and the type of the most derived object has an unambiguous and public base class of type Target, the result points/refers to the Target subobject of the most derived object. In other words, dynamic_cast can be used to crosscast (or side-cast) pointers/references, between two types derived from the same base.

You shouldn't be using dynamic cast to solve this problem. Hell, you sohuldn't be doing any of this in the first place!

In any case, in actual usage, the developers responsible do stuff like this:

    if (IS_INSTANCE_OF(animal, Felid)) {
        Felid *cat = (Felid *) animal; // Yes another C-style cast - this time (hopefully) devolving to the same dynamic_cast hidden inside the expansion of the previous macro.

I love when a comment says "hopefully". "This hopefully does what I think it should do".

I'll let Alan summarize the problems:

Used prudently, the dynamic dispatch facility that object oriented languages provide their users can be a valuable tool for capturing the domain model in clean, elegant code. However, as even C++'s designer Bjarne Stroustrup acknowledged, in "The Design and Evolution of C++", the introduction of support for Run-Time Type Information makes it possible to spurn such assistance and write RTTI-based code for which a verdict of "combines the syntactic elegance of C with the run-time efficiency of Smalltalk" is just "too kind".

[Advertisement] Keep all your packages and Docker containers in one place, scan for vulnerabilities, and control who can access different feeds. ProGet installs in minutes and has a powerful free version with a lot of great features that you can upgrade when ready.Learn more.

11:14

Grrl Power #1503 – Umami is in the mouth of the beholder [Grrl Power]

What is the funniest condiment? Originally, Cthillia demanded spicy mustard, but I capriciously changed it before posting. I do think both options are good on tempura… well, I don’t know about ratballs, but generally spicy mustard and yum yum sauce go well with most fried things. Ponzu sauce too. BTW, “ratballs” are not clumps of rat testicles or testicles from giant rats. It’s a rat, crushed into a ball, and batter fried. I don’t know where the extra bones come from.

Anyway, I don’t know if “Magic Shell” ice cream topping counts as a proper condiment, but I guess that’d be amusing to put on any random food item. Likewise, I don’t think candy sprinkles are proper condiments either. I think a condiment pretty much needs to be a sauce? Chutney is a funny sounding word. So is Tahini, but I think they’d both be perfectly acceptable for a fried crunchy meat surprise. Chimichurri is also a funny sounding word, but it’s also delicious. I dunno, maybe for a funny condiment, you’d have to veer into the unexpected, like if she wanted grape jelly for her ratballs. Or grape jelly and yellow mustard, which sounds foul, but actually, if you put equal parts jelly and mustard in a crock pot and dump in a bunch of meatballs, you’ve basically got a pot of sweet and sour meatballs. That used to be my go to for office pot lucks.

Is Deus kind-of-maybe hitting on Cthillia in a childish bid to make Sciona jealous? I have no idea, actually. I think he’s just being gregarious and obnoxious. He’d call it “chummy,” especially if he was kind-of-maybe hitting on a shark woman with a bucket of fish guts. See? Cause… the fish bucket… >cough<

As for why he’s got a box next to Cora’s suite? He knows Dabbler and knows she’s old friends with Cora, so maybe he found out that she was getting a suite and booked the one next to hers for… reasons? Probably to hit on Cora, if the opportunity arose, if I’m honest. He is definitely aware that Cora’s ship was conspicuously not reported as having left Earth, and Earth in the world of Grrl Power is still fairly excited about the revelation of aliens and the one spaceship full of sexy aliens that hangs out with the still newly revealed sexy superheroes, so there’s more than a little media attention on the comings and goings of Cora’s ship. Which I think I named “The Interdictor,” which is not especially memorable or creative, IMO. Maybe I’ll say it’s a heavily modified Interdictor class ship if it comes up again. I don’t recall if the name even appeared in the comic or just in my post below some page.

It would be weird dating a guy who could palm both of your butt-cheeks at once. I… assume. I have no perspective on that. Actually I probably drew Harem’s butt too small there in panel 2 and 4. It’s one of those things that looks okay from this exact angle, but if I had to animate it in a 3D fly around it’d probably be all kinds of messed up. I think I underemphasize hips on women, which I’ve been trying to correct – where appropriate. Especially fit women tend to have smaller looking hips because they have less padding to smooth out their curves, and I mostly draw fit women or beanpoles. I think I draw butts too small too, generally. Max is supposed to have one of those “a little too much time on the stairclimber” butts, AKA a conspicuous, but very fit butt. Granted I usually draw her wearing non-skintight paramilitary style pants, but of course Ixah has no excuse.


Oh, look who it is in the vote incentive. The NSFW version is finally up at Patreon. Plus a bonus pic.

I think she would get in trouble for doing this. She’d mess up the… floor of the waterfall? Is that what it’s called? The receiving pool? No, probably not that. Anyway, she’d churn things up and cause a ton of weird erosion.

Since you might be wondering, Niagara Falls is about 165 feet high, so Babezilla obviously doesn’t have to be full sized. I’d say she’s about 175-180 feet tall here?


Double res version will be posted over at Patreon. Feel free to contribute as much as you like.

10:35

The best in the world is a local problem [Seth's Blog]

On a good day, my bongo score looks like this:

Compared to all the people who have played this morning, it’s right at the top. That could be great…

Except I’m not being compared to every player in the world. The first graph is built to compare every player who has never previously won the competition.

Here’s the curve of all players, including the 500 previous champions. To win the day, you need to get through that dip that most players don’t achieve.

Same score, different ranking.

Here’s Shelly-Ann Fraser-Pryce running against the other parents at a school picnic:

I’m sure she deflated the egos of quite a few parents, the ones who usually win at these sorts of things.

Choosing our competition is the most productive decision we make each day.

The internet has made the world smaller, and the universe of competitors larger. But it’s still local–awareness, trust and convenience drive choice.

To be chosen, we need to be seen as the best in the world. But we get to choose which world.

09:42

Man-Made Horrors, Part Three [Penny Arcade]

New Comic: Man-Made Horrors, Part Three

08:49

Welcome our new member - Richard Qin [Planet GNU]

Hi, All:

Please join me in welcoming our new member:

User Details:
-------------
Name: Richard Qin
Login: richardqin
Email: richard.qin.x@gmail.com

I wish Richard Qin a wonderful journey in GNU CTT.

Happy Hacking
wxie

07:21

Swapping money for expertise [Cory Doctorow's craphound.com]

The First Bank of Chicago, a Grecian temple to money. It is surrounded by flames. A skeleton in academic robes and mortarboards has been lynched from its roof. In the foreground are banded packages of US $100 bills.

This week on my podcast, I read Swapping money for expertise, a recent essay from my Pluralistic blog about the political economy of “AI” based on theory-free inference.

The need to understand and describe a thing before you could apply “AI” to it is a bottleneck, because it requires programmers to understand how a thing works before they can incorporate it into an “AI” system. Lots of programmers know how to play chess, but far fewer understand the human pancreas, planetary weather systems, or patterns of mineral deposition in the Earth’s crust.

For programmers to apply machine learning to these domains, they need to collaborate with experts who do understand them, who furthermore expect to be paid for this work. The need for expert input into this kind of “AI” represents a significant increase in the wage-bill paid by the programmer’s employer: it means they have to pay for programmers and experts.

Even worse: this kind of “AI” can’t be applied to systems we don’t understand. We can observe far more causal relationships – instances in which A reliably causes B – in the universe than we can explain. There are lots of examples of us operationalizing these observations without understanding them. If you get sick today, your doctor might well prescribe one of the many medicines whose method of action is either incompletely understood or not understood at all. We know that molecule A reliably treats pathology B, but not why, and while that why is the subject of ongoing research, it’s not necessary that the why be known before the molecule can be given to ailing patients.

MP3

05:35

Girl Genius for Monday, October 12, 2026 [Girl Genius]

The Girl Genius comic for Monday, October 12, 2026 has been posted.

05:21

Help, I’m Too Helpful [Ctrl+Alt+Del Comic]

I don’t know how or when this really happened, but I have somehow become that guy that volunteers for shit as pertains to any of my kids’ many activities. Coach, board member, social media coordinator, prop-builder, uniform designer, etc. I am suddenly wearing a stupid number of hats because I cannot seem to keep my […]

The post Help, I’m Too Helpful appeared first on Ctrl+Alt+Del Comic.

05:07

Kernel prepatch 7.3-rc7 [LWN.net]

The 7.3-rc7 kernel prepatch is out for testing. According to Linus: "As always, I would have preferred to see a smaller rc, but it's not like anything in here looks like a reason to delay the final release. So that's still set for next weekend unless something new comes up."

One notable change that slipped into the mainline this week is the deprecation of the ext4 data=journal mode; it will be removed entirely at the beginning of 2028.

03:35

Anh In Time Out [QC RSS v2]

processing...

00:07

One way of thinking about access specifiers in C++/WinRT implementation types [The Old New Thing]

In C++/WinRT, Windows Runtime classes are exposed to the outside world through the projection, but internally they are represented by their implementation type. Since the outside world sees only the projection, implementation types are visible only to the module that produced them.

This realization lets you reinterpret the C++ access specifiers for C++/WinRT implementation types.

Declared on
implementation as
C# and C++/CX
equivalent
Accessible to
implemented interface public Anyone
public internal Code in the same module
protected protected Code in derived classes
private private Code in the same class

In code:

struct Widget : winrt::implements<Widget, IStringable>
{
public:
    // This is a member of IStringable,
    // so it is accessible to anyone.
    winrt::hstring ToString();

    // This does not implement any member from IStringable,
    // so it is accessible to other code in the same module.
    void Recolor(winrt::Windows::UI::Color newColor);

protected:
    // Accessible to implementation classes that derive from Widget.
    void Reverse();

private:
    // Accessible only to Widget itself.
    void Reset();
};

Note that if you are implementing a runtime class, then C++/WinRT autogenerates a template for you that auto-declares all of the declared interfaces of that class.

// Widget.idl

namespace Contoso
{
    runtimeclass Widget : Windows.Foundation.IStringable
    {
        String Name{ get; };
        void Toggle();
    }
}

The IDL compiler autogenerates an interface IWidget with a property Name and a method Toggle().

// implementation
namespace winrt::Contoso
{
    struct Widget : WidgetT<Widget>
    {
        ⟦ ... ⟧
    };
}

The WidgetT<Widget> expands to implements<Widget, IWidget, Windows::Foundation::IStringable> because those are the interfaces declared by the IDL file.

The post One way of thinking about access specifiers in C++/WinRT implementation types appeared first on The Old New Thing.

Sunday, 11 October

22:07

Link [Scripting News]

Automattic has created a Stewart Brand website to honor one of the most creative and respected people of my generation of the web. Chronicling his work is time well spent. "I'm envious," I wrote in response. "The tech industry is gradually disconnecting the early web, pre-https. A hundred years from now they may have your writing and pictures, but the early web will be gone. The web as designed was very resilient, but it can’t survive deliberate attempt to destroy." I think Stewart would understand why we should help the web we loved so much, archive itself. Think about it this way. Would you rather visit the Hearst Castle at San Simeon, or read about it in a book? You'd want to do both. I want my work to survive a hundred years as it was when it was first published. This would be a good thing for us to work on, together, imho. I did the first Long Now bet for Stewart's Long Now foundation. I always thought it was the first, now they say it's the second? Did someone pull rank? :-)

16:42

Link [Scripting News]

Basic lesson for people who use Claude Code -- it's your time that's valuable, not the bot's. If you find you're lost in the weeds supporting Claude for whatever reason, find a good stopping point, pick up another project, that doesn't use AI to do your code-writing. If you have a question ask ChatGPT browser version, but only for the kind of stuff you'd ask it in 2025. You're not co-developing. You're doing it yourself. It's very important to be clear about your coding, not Claude's output. Here's the key point -- it's your time that's limited, that has all the value. You can get Claude to develop something, but if you don't have time to use it, to nurture it, nothing will come of the work. I was surprised at how I'd lost the rhythm of writing my own code, and also how much I liked doing it myself. It's easy to get lost in the miracle of AI, good to pop up for air every so often.

16:21

Stable kernels 7.2.10 and 6.18.56 [LWN.net]

The 7.2.10 and 6.18.56 stable kernels have been released. Each contains another several hundred important fixes.

15:35

Steinar H. Gunderson: Decompiler patterns, part 8: Un-repetition of conditions [Planet Debian]

Today, for a slightly more complicated snippet, but still in the same general area; say you have code like this:

x = (0x1000 - y) / 24;
z = var_s5 < 5;
if (x >= 0x81) {
    x = 0x80;
    z = var_s5 < 5;
}
var_s4 = 0;
if (z == 0) {

In particular, note the z = var_s5 < 5; repeated. Most likely, this is the compiler sticking stuff into branch delay slots, or else re-checking the condition if var_s5 changed in the branches (it does not here). You almost certainly want to undo this into:

x = (0x1000 - y) / 24;
if (x >= 0x81) {
    x = 0x80;
}
var_s4 = 0;
if ((var_s5 < 5) == 0) {

and the if, as we already know, should probably rather then be:

if (var_s5 >= 5) {

For a small bonus (since I'm not going to have a separate post about it), you can choose to change the upper if to:

if (x > 0x80) {
    x = 0x80;
}

which generates exactly the same code (on MIPS), but may in many cases be easier to understand.

10:28

Talent becomes media [Seth's Blog]

Rivian has a new ad, starring Bill Murray.

It’s not a great ad (more on that below) but the remarkable thing is that it features the quirky, beloved and scarce Bill Murray. Between the movie rights, music and Bill, they had to have spent many millions of dollars, and it doesn’t look like they bought a single slot of ad time. For less total cost than a boring Ford commercial in 1985, they hooked up with two icons.

That’s a complete flip from hiring an unknown to pitch your brand of freeze dried coffee but spending millions on network TV.

Thirty years later, the attention equation is now reversed. No one watches an ad on YouTube unless they want to, and so, your talent buy is your media buy.

This is going to amplify a different sort of creative agency as well as give recognizable talent more leverage. A good ad in the TV days was annoying but led to action. A good ad today creates enrollment and buzz. Attention is insufficient, though. Ghostbusters was seen by millions, but it didn’t sell many vintage Hearses.

[And why is this a lousy ad? I love my Rivian, but not because it has a Ghostbuster button. The first job of advertising a new brand is to earn it a position, to give us a story about what you’d like to stand for. Who it’s for and how we’re going to feel when we wear the label you’re offering us. Jaguar dropped the ball when they re-branded last year. AI companies are terrible at this as well, and it appears that Rivian missed a chance with Bill.]

Don’t cross the streams.

PS While we’re on the topic, please don’t buy cheap chocolate.

06:14

Russ Allbery: Review: Daggerbound [Planet Debian]

Review: Daggerbound, by T. Kingfisher

Series: Swordheart #2
Publisher: Bramble
Copyright: 2026
ISBN: 1-250-40009-0
Format: Kindle
Pages: 436

Daggerbound is a secondary-world fantasy and a sequel to Swordheart, although it follows different protagonists for most of the book. It's also a sort of sequel to the Clocktaur War duology in that one of the protagonists was a protagonist of those books. T. Kingfisher is the pen name Ursula Vernon uses for her adult fiction.

Learned Edmond was once a devout acolyte of the Order of the Many-Armed God and a true believer in its teachings, including the ones about the evils of women. Then he went on an adventure with, among other people, a forger named Mistress Slate, during which he learned a great deal of things about the world that his order did not teach him. He has spent the subsequent years trying to bring this important new information to his order and encourage them to adjust their view of the world accordingly.

The order has not changed, and Edmond is very tired.

Someone needs to carry a number of books and a magical sword to the city of Archon's Glory. Edmond has volunteered and intends to perform the task exactly as expected, and then never return. He is unsure what he will do then, but at least it will be different.

Edmond did not expect to be waylaid by bandits or to accidentally draw the magical sword. He certainly did not expect the man who appeared in a flash of light and violently saved him from the bandits.

It would have been very convenient for the Dervish if Edmond died of his injuries after drawing the sword. That would leave the sword without a wielder and therefore the Dervish without someone he had to protect. All he would have to do was sit and watch while the fever and cold and lack of water did the work, and then he would be free. Given his past experience with wielders, no one could even blame him. Except maybe his own conscience.

I did not realize I wanted to read a novel about a traumatized Mercedes Lackey sword waking up in a T. Kingfisher universe, but apparently I did.

The Dervish is not a sword, precisely, at least not in the way that Need has become by the time we meet her in Lackey's novels. He's a man trapped in a sword, he doesn't like it, and he would very much like it to stop. But at the start of the book, he has the rest of the vibe of a Mercedes Lackey protagonist: vast past trauma, poor emotional regulation skills, and a prickly cynicism that only runs skin deep. Pairing him with an Edmund who is far more mature than in the earlier duology but still rather innocent and delightfully neurodivergent is a great touch.

The rest of the plot was fine but not that memorable. Like the Clocktaur series, there is a strong feeling of episodic D&D adventure as the characters stumble across disconnected problems and hostilities while collecting party members. Like Ursula Vernon's occasional D&D recaps, this party has a tendency to adopt everyone they come in contact with, which includes a gnole (as always one of the best parts of the book) and a sentient giant pill bug. The pill bug, who has a complex appendage-operated mechanical talk box and a banner that says "I DO NOT EAT HUMAN MEAT," is the most Ursula Vernon character that has ever existed in fiction.

There is a romance because there is always a romance in the novels set in this universe. I didn't mind this one. Like every Kingfisher romance, it involves a lot of irritating refusal to communicate and endless angst about how the other person couldn't possibly be in love with them, but the characters have rather more justification than usual and at least I didn't spend most of the book thinking one half of the romantic pairing was an idiot. Apparently it helps if no paladins are involved.

The strongest parts of this book are the beginning, before the Lackey vibes unfortunately drain out of the story, and the end, when all of the best characters from Swordheart show up again. The Temple of the White Rat continues to be the best feature of this fictional universe, and I could read endless books about how they solve problems.

The Dervish gazed at her with admiration. "And here I thought you'd be on the side of law and order..."

"No, young man," said Beartongue, despite being several centuries his junior. "I am on the side of justice. If we're lucky, the two run in parallel. If they don't, we bend the law to attain justice, not the other way around."

The ending also featured some exploration of the edge cases of the rules for the sentient swords that reminded me a bit of Fred Saberhagen with better characterization.

Daggerbound was not as charming as Swordheart, mostly because Halla appeared only at the end. I wish Kingfisher had leaned more into the Mercedes Lackey vibes rather than taking her normal D&D-flavored romance approach. But this was enjoyable, charming at times, had great supporting characters like all Kingfisher novels, and was a satisfying continuation of the series. I am looking forward to the third (and I believe final) book, which is supposed to be out next year.

Recommended if you liked Swordheart.

Followed by the not-yet-published Shieldborn.

Rating: 7 out of 10

06:00

Urgent: Investigate Sen. Collins [Richard Stallman's Political Notes]

US citizens: call on the Senate to investigate Sen. Collins for possible corruption.

US citizens: Join with this campaign to address this issue.

To phone your congresscritter about this, the main switchboard is +1-202-224-3121.

Please spread the word.

Urgent: Block destruction of national parks and forests [Richard Stallman's Political Notes]

US citizens: call on Congress to block the saboteur in chief from destroying America's national parks and forests.

US citizens: Join with this campaign to address this issue.

To phone your congresscritter about this, the main switchboard is +1-202-224-3121.

Please spread the word.

Digital display of product prices [Richard Stallman's Political Notes]

The AFL-CIO warns that digital display of product prices is likely to eliminate tens of thousands of jobs in the US while increasing grocery prices significantly.

If you think those two consequences are contradictory, it could be that you believe that the main factor affecting products' retail prices is how much the products cost the store. That economic theory was based on the assumption of so much competition that it would compel stores to pass savings along to the customers.

Nothing like that is true nowadays. After decades of mergers and megamergers, and data companies that enable all stores easily to sync up prices without directly communicating about them, competition hardly affects what stores can charge.

Connected car ideal for coercive control [Richard Stallman's Political Notes]

A connected car is an ideal weapon for coercive control — by people you know, or by strangers working for your country's government, or by strangers working for another country's government.

Failure to punish Dubya for torture [Richard Stallman's Political Notes]

The US's failure to punish Dubya for torture, in Guantanamo and other parts of the world, paved the way for the persecutor to embrace torture in the US.

Legal excuse for presidents to block investigation [Richard Stallman's Political Notes]

The corrupter's Department of Thwarting Justice has invented a new legal excuse for presidents to block investigation into their conduct by Congress or courts.

Robert Reich on Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as Democratic nominee [Richard Stallman's Political Notes]

Robert Reich lauds Bernie Sanders, then encourages Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to run for the Democratic nomination for president in 2028, although he does not expect she would win it this time.

I know one reason that she probably won't win it: the Democratic National Committee is is dominated by big business, and it barely disguises its bias against progressive candidates.

I voted for Sanders, and if Ocasio-Cortez runs, I will vote for her.

Right-wing extremist party in Sweden's government [Richard Stallman's Political Notes]

Admitting a right-wing extremist party into Sweden's government has spread hate, cruelty and global heating denialism into the rest of Sweden's parties.

(satire) GTA VI feature [Richard Stallman's Political Notes]

(satire) *Hyperrealistic ‘GTA VI’ Feature Makes Players Serve Out Prison Sentences In Real Time.*

Things FLOCK cameras capture [Richard Stallman's Political Notes]

FLOCK cameras don't just capture license plate numbers. They capture faces, too, and other aspects of the appearance of people and cars.

Often cops search for people photographed while merely standing for a while in one place.

We need to do more than end federal subsidies for such cameras. We must stop them from being useful for repression, by putting strict limits on surveillance cameras and permitting only security cameras.

Laws being pushed by Big Chemistry [Richard Stallman's Political Notes]

Big Chemistry is pushing a law to prohibit accusing factories of dangerous pollution based on the sort of air quality monitors that ordinary people can afford.

Protecting Koalas and allowing greenhouse gas emissions [Richard Stallman's Political Notes]

Australia is considering a deal to protect more of the forests where koalas (vulnerable) live in exchange for allowing additional greenhouse gas emissions.

In effect, planet roasters are holding adorable koalas hostage with a demand to let them continue destroying civilization and the biosphere. Bravo for the Green legislators with the courage to denounce that ransom demand.

Support for affordability and accountability [Richard Stallman's Political Notes]

Progressive campaigners report that most Americans would support a political campaign that joins the goals of "affordability" (to benefit the non-rich) and "accountability" (to be imposed on the rich).

It is useful to know that this combination — lowering prices by eliminating corruption -- can defeat the magats and plutocratists. However, it is not evident to me that the combination includes or implies preventing climate disaster, restoring human rights, upholding science, protecting everyone from Orwellian surveillance, and rejecting bigotry.

Thus, if "accountability" and "corruption" are interpreted in the usual narrow sense, I'd have to say these two goals alone are disastrously insufficient.

Neo-Nazis in Republican employment [Richard Stallman's Political Notes]

Some Republican officials are treating and describing neo-Nazis as toxic in their employment.

That is a positive change, but they need to understand that if you run in the same circles as Nazis — in the circles that have vicious ideas that attract Nazis — you will have opportunity after opportunity to take up with someone who is a Nazi. Look how many Republicans associate willingly with Elon Musk, or the monster in the White House. They can hardly avoid

I praise the old ACLU for defending freedom of speech for everyone, to express any views whatsoever — even including Nazis. I cite Nazis as an example here because their views are as vicious as can be. I am sure the ACLU's leaders judged them that way too. But they recognized that when you start denying people's freedom of speech because you dislike their views, that is the start of tyranny — and people who criticize the powerful in any way are likely to be on the receiving end.

I am not surprised that the extent of support for Nazi views in some countries today goes hand in hand with hatred and cruelty for many disprivileged groups.

Recognizing the freedom to advocate vicious views does not imply ceasing to castigate them.

02:21

Utkarsh Gupta: FOSS Activities in September 2026 [Planet Debian]

Here’s my monthly but brief update about the activities I’ve done in the FOSS world.

Debian

Whilst I didn’t have much time, here are still a few things that I worked on:

  • Sponsored ubuntu-dev-tools/0.214 for Florent ‘Skia’ Jacquet, which updates seeded-in-ubuntu to use the new per-series indexer (LP: #2160240).
  • Assisted a few folks in getting their patches submitted via Salsa.
  • Mentoring for newcomers.
  • Moderation of -project mailing list.

Ubuntu

I joined Canonical to work on Ubuntu full-time back in February 2021.

  • With 26.10 in Feature Freeze, wore my Release team hat to:
    • Review and approve a bunch of Feature Freeze Exceptions, including the Go 1.27 transition, Qt 6.11.2, rust-coreutils 0.12.0, devscripts 2.6.12, kdump-tools moving to dracut, and a few GCE packages.
    • Point linux-entra-sso to the SRU team, as it didn’t need an FFe at all, and milestone a couple of bugs for 26.10.
  • Continued to push for infrastructure improvements:
    • Made ubuntu-cdimage more resilient to Launchpad hiccups (MP).
    • Taught generate-freeze-block in ubuntu-archive-tools a couple of new options (--skip-update and --series) and better error handling (MP).
    • Bumped the arm64 generic non-cloud image to 4.5G in livecd-rootfs and uploaded it as 26.10.16; also sponsored the follow-up 26.10.17 for Chloé.
  • Sponsored aevol/9.4.0-2ubuntu1 for Matthieu, fixing an FTBFS with GCC 15’s LTO (LP: #2167811).
  • Reviewed quite a lot of MPs - britney hints, meta-release, ubuntu-release-tools, ubuntu-archive-tools, ubuntu-cdimage, livecd-rootfs, ubuntu-seeds, and so on.
  • Enabled upgrades to 26.04 LTS.
  • Released 26.10 Beta and announced it on Discourse.
  • Did Archive Admin, DMB, and Release team duties as usual.

Debian (E)LTS

This month I have worked 33.5 hours on Debian Long Term Support (LTS) and on its sister Extended LTS project and did the following things:

(A quick note that I did quite a lot of the work during my work as Frontdesk that went on till 4th Oct, so 33.50 hours include the work I did till 4th October 2026.)

Released Security Updates

  • node-lodash: Prototype pollution in _.unset and _.omit (plus a bypass of the initial fix for it), and code injection via the imports option of _.template.

    • [LTS]: Fixed CVE-2025-13465, CVE-2026-2950, and CVE-2026-4800 via 4.17.21+dfsg+~cs8.31.198.20210220-9+deb12u1 for bookworm. This has been released as DLA 4820-1.
    • This is the bookworm follow-up to DLA 4663-1 that I carried over from July. The update had been sitting prepared and tested on debusine, so once the upstream discussion wrapped up, it went straight out. It also carries an extra patch to the lodash-cli dependency map - without it, the regenerated lodash.template module throws “assignWith is not defined” at runtime, which node-gulp-util’s autopkgtest caught.
  • libpng1.6: Use-after-free of zlib input in png_read_end() after incomplete zTXt, iTXt, or iCCP decompression, which could result in denial of service.

Work in Progress

  • libpng1.6: The same CVE-2026-46675.
    • [ELTS]: Claimed in ela-needed; the same upstream fix applies to all three ELTS suites, so this should go out shortly.

Other Activities

  • [E/LTS] Did my front-desk week from 28-09 to 04-10.

    • Over the week I did roughly:
      • Triage of 524 unique CVEs across 192 source packages and all four suites. And 1 automated ELTS end-of-life sweep.
      • Additional data is now part of the front-desk job too, so 75 commits record it for 179 CVEs across 71 packages.
    • Newly queued 22 source packages - 13 in dla-needed (apache2, chromium, firefox-esr, libnet-idn-encode-perl, libpng1.6, node-shell-quote, nvidia-graphics-drivers, openssl, pcre2, php-mongodb, php8.2, social-auth-core, and wpa) and 16 in ela-needed (apache2, firefox-esr, gegl, lemonldap-ng, libnet-idn-encode-perl, libpng1.6, libwebsockets, nsd, nvidia-graphics-drivers, pcre2, php7.0, php7.3, php7.4, rar, unrar-nonfree, and wpa), 7 of them in both. Also widened 3 ELTS entries to bullseye - antiword, ocaml, and openvswitch.
    • Most of the interesting work was again in the <not-affected> verdicts: 217 of 263 (83%, across 57 packages) rest on showing that the vulnerable code or feature isn’t in the source we ship. Another 17 cover incomplete upstream fixes that we either never shipped or shipped with the follow-up already in (expat, libxml2, node-tar, and pyjwt). 15 come from bundled components we don’t ship - node-ajv again, which uses uri-js and not fast-uri, and nvidia-open, which doesn’t ship the NGX updater. And 13 are vendor- or platform-specific - openssh’s CVE-2026-55654 lives only in a Red Hat GSSAPI patch, and the netdata and PHP ones only affect Windows.
    • Did 4 rounds of newly supported bullseye packages (33 packages overall), plus libmail-mboxparser-perl for buster - 34 in all. The existing CVE data mostly held up; the real finds were discovery gaps. One interesting gotcha: sid renamed stunnel4 to stunnel, and two new CVEs were associated only with the new name, so they never showed up for trixie, bookworm, or any ELTS suite. I also sorted the 180 “Triage needed” entries (57 packages) from elts-eol by where each was already handled, and triaged for ELTS the 100 that trixie or bookworm had already decided; the rest come next. And I imported 79 package-level lines for the older source names ELTS still ships (tomcat8, php7.0/7.3/7.4, netty-3.9, openssl1.0, python2.7/3.5/3.7, and pypy).
    • Caught some inconsistencies in released advisories: DLA 4801-1 (swift) was missing a CVE, ELA 1831-1 (redis) listed the wrong one, and DLA 4808-1 (network-manager-l2tp) listed CVE-2026-75883 - an ID that was renamed and then reassigned to an unrelated ppp issue. I fixed all three in the tracker’s advisory lists.
    • Made the Security team and the uploaders aware of regressions from our own updates:
      • libde265: the CVE-2026-49337 fix in DLA 4789-1/ELA 1828-1 (and DSA 6413-1) misses upstream’s follow-up commit.
      • libxml2 CVE-2026-76781 and policykit-1 CVE-2026-85498 were introduced by our own back-ports; the policykit-1 one is harmless.
      • expat: the CVE-2025-59375 backport in DLA 4807-1 is compiled out, because XML_GE is never defined.
      • xen: DLA 4818-1’s XSA-491 fix makes XSA-510 reachable.
      • gegl: the CVE-2026-2049/2050 back-port in ELA 1650-1 rejects valid RLE .hdr files.
      • log4cxx: DLA 4322-1 broke UTF-8 in JSONLayout output. That one is functional, not security.
    • Helped correct a set of triages and let the Debian Security team know:
      • ruby-json CVE-2026-71847: the vulnerable code was never in a released Debian version.
      • openssh CVE-2026-55654: only affects a Red Hat-specific GSSAPI patch.
      • three libxml2 issues that don’t affect trixie either.
      • the stunnel4 rename above.
      • trixie <no-dsa> lines on jsch, node-qs, and ruby-loofah, where trixie’s version doesn’t have the vulnerable feature at all.
    • Independently found a security issue in rclone and reported it privately upstream through a GitHub security advisory. Upstream already had a report for the same issue, so they folded mine into the existing advisory and credited me as a co-reporter.
    • Also found some bugs in the additional-data tooling, e.g. cve-ad --package P --severity tbd wipes the CVE-level severity, and the schema doesn’t validate package-level entries at all.
  • [E/LTS] Monitored discussions on mailing lists, IRC, and all the documentation updates.

  • [E/LTS] Attended the monthly LTS meeting on IRC. Meeting notes here.


Until next time.
:wq for today.

00:42

View From A Hotel Window, Cleveland: 10/10/2026 [Whatever]

A view from not all that high up of the building across from my own. It is beige and has windows and multiple stories. Very unexciting.

Bet you weren’t expecting a View From A Hotel Window double feature today, were you?! While my father is in New York City, I find myself in.. Cleveland! Yay, Cleveland!

Jokes aside, I am very glad to be here with my friend for the next couple of days and we have so much fun stuff planned. I know it’s gonna be great! Hope you have a nice couple of days, as well.

-AMS

Saturday, 10 October

20:07

Steinar H. Gunderson: Decompilation patterns, part 7: if to condition [Planet Debian]

A variation of the pattern from yesterday; say you have:

if (x == 3) {
    y = 0;
} else {
    y = 1;
}

When these are zero and one, sometimes this will give a better match, since booleans are evaluated as such:

y = (x != 3);

It's rare to have something else than zero or one work for this pattern (e.g. you would rarely write y = (x != 3) * 2 + 1).

17:56

Link [Scripting News]

Today I did something different. I wrote a little Node app, without Claude's help. It was a revelation. It's been most of a year since I actually started even a test app and wrote it from beginning to end. I used to do this routinely. Nothing routine about it anymore. What this app does, it generates a Markdown-only version of scripting.com for testing. I want to see what such a site looks like. It'll be a start.

16:14

Tim Retout: Reading my solar inverter over RS485 [Planet Debian]

For over ten years, the only way I have had of knowing what our solar panels are doing has been an impulse monitor on the generation meter, counting the flashes of its LED. It has always been a bit flaky due to battery changes or loose connections, and there has never been a way to see solar generation alongside the energy used by the rest of the house. This week I have fixed that, by building a small ESPHome sensor which talks directly to the inverter. I am still reeling slightly: with AI assistance, it took under a week from idea to working implementation, and it is a project I would certainly never have attempted otherwise. The result is zeversolar-esphome.

The inverter is a Zeversolar Zeverlution 3680, which has an RS485 port but no Wi-Fi or Ethernet module. It doesn’t speak Modbus; it uses Eversolar’s own master/slave protocol, which nobody has officially documented but which several people have reverse-engineered over the years (credit to eversolar-monitor, Heliograph and others). Manufacturer support for Eversolar/Zeversolar inverters apparently ended in December 2019 when the company went out of business.

The rating plate on the side of the inverter, reading Model: Zeverlution 3680, with its input and output ratings and safety symbols.

The rating plate on my inverter.

A while ago I had looked into what ports were available on this inverter with a view to connecting some sort of monitoring, but I had abandoned it as “too hard”. While working on some Home Assistant configuration, Claude suggested the idea again, but similarly wrote it off initially. I encouraged it to explore a bit further, and supplied the model number of the inverter, at which point the picture got a lot more promising. After a bit of back-and-forth about hardware, we settled on an M5Stack Atom Lite on an Atomic RS485 Base. The main attraction was that it already comes in a case, so I didn’t need to design (or, more likely, bodge) an enclosure.

While I waited for the parts to arrive, Claude wrote the firmware: an ESPHome external component built around a small, dependency-free C++ driver, with host-side unit tests against byte captures that other people had published from other models. I found it slightly surreal to have a tested protocol driver before owning any hardware to run it on.

Cables

The parts came before the tools I needed to get into the inverter safely (a DC clamp meter and a T25 screwdriver bit), so in the meantime I made up an RS485 cable - this uses an RJ45 connection at one end, and some custom wiring at the other. My first attempt was with some CAT 6, but (as Claude had pointed out and I had ignored) its solid-core conductors are much harder to twist together. So I gave up and sacrificed an old CAT 5e patch lead instead, which went much better.

The cut end of a white CAT 5e cable, with its twisted pairs pushed into an orange four-way screw-terminal plug.

The custom end of the cable, before being taped up.

The risky bit

On a Zeverlution, the RJ45 sockets are inside the wiring compartment, which means taking the cover off to install the monitor. The manual addresses this part to qualified electricians. So the step I was most nervous about was not the software at all, but safely isolating the inverter.

The inverter with its cover removed, showing large capacitors along the top, a green circuit board with a small LCD display, and cable glands along the bottom edge.

Inside the inverter, with the cover off.

I did this with appropriate caution, following the instructions from the manual carefully, and also waiting until after dark just in case. Now that I understand how the DC clips from the panels work, I can see how to do this safely during daytime too – but hopefully this won’t be necessary.

A yellow RJ45 plug in one of the two network sockets on the inverter's circuit board, with its white cable running out through a cable gland in the base.

Plugged in, and threaded through the cable gland.

Warning: if you’re not confident, I would always advise to get an electrician to do this bit. Do what I say, not what I do.

Debugging over Wi-Fi

Once the device was installed, the nice thing about ESPHome is that I never need to go back in the loft again to update it – it reflashes over Wi-Fi. I’ve taken full advantage of this for debugging, and for reading the wire protocol directly from the logs.

A hand holding the small grey M5Stack Atom Lite on its RS485 base, with the inverter cable taped into the screw terminals on top and its status LED glowing green.

The finished device. Green means generating.

Separately, I’ve used Claude to integrate the new sensors into Home Assistant. Solar generation finally sits in the Energy dashboard next to the rest of the house’s usage, which was the whole point.

Reflections

This was a fun, quick project, and it solved a problem that has eluded me for a decade. I want to be honest about how much of that is down to the AI: I would not have attempted any of this on my own. I could not have told you the protocol existed, never mind implemented it. My contribution was everything involving a screwdriver, and ordering some hardware.

12:56

BT SFI Should not exist any more [RevK®'s ramblings]

It is a while since I have ranted about "Special Faults Investigation" service that Openreach sell.

Why did SFI exist?

  • Openreach sold a service called metallic path or shared metallic path which is the wires from exchange to master socket. The standard for it was that of wires capable of making a telephone call, though the standard was improved in time.
  • BT Wholesale (at the time pretending not to be the same legal entity as Openreach) buy that, add equipment at the exchange (DSLAMs), backhaul, more equipment (BRASs, switches, etc), more backhaul, and sold a DATA service, at one end being a hand over (typically at a data centre) which is fibre with ATM or Ethernet, and at the other end the master socket with ADSL encoding.
  • ISPs buy that and add equipment in the data centre (LNS, Switches, DNS, email, etc) and transit and peering links, and sell an INTERNET service to customers - sometimes terminating at the master socket as ADSL, sometimes including a supplied router and Ethernet and/or WiFi

This system worked pretty well, and at each level someone is providing a service to some spec for a fee, and if the service breaks and does not meet that spec, then of course, they have to fix it, at no charge to their customer. Each layer builds on many parts to make a service to their customer.

This is where SFI comes in - there is gap. If the metallic path breaks, Openreach will fix it, however if it meets the spec (based on telephone calls) but is not good enough for ADSL data (e.g. below the min sync level BTW have agreed with the ISP), then Openreach DON'T HAVE TO FIX IT because it meets the metallic path spec. So they SELL an extra service to BTW, a Special faults Investigation, which, for a fee, involves the engineer trying to improve the metallic path (beyond the spec) to be better for data (e.g. ADSL). BTW have to buy this so as to fix the broken data service that they are selling to the ISP.

Why was SFI controversial?

All of the above sounds fine, at first. Bear in mind, BTW sell a data service to ISPs, and if a DSLAM breaks they will get it fixed (at not charge to ISP) and the same should apply if the data over the metallic path breaks (e.g. below agreed minimum sync rate), and again as not to spec that should be at no charge to ISP. But BTW DID CHARGE ISPs for the SFI. What is worse is many ISPs then charged their customers for the SFI!

This led to a lot of disputes, and the pettiness got mental. Some examples are BTW used to say SFI was optional so on all faults said we do not opt for SFI. They then refused to actually fix lines unless and SFI was booked but said charge was for work beyond the master socket, so we said do no work beyond master socket. They then said they could not accept that request, and also said that a visual inspection of the end user router and wiring counted as (chargeable) work beyond the master socket. At one point we instructed customers (who did this) to remove their router and all wiring and physically hide it out of sight before the BT engineer arrived. We had pictures even. BTW still tried to charge. On one occasion the engineer immediately closed the fault as "no customer router plugged in", without testing or fixing the fault! We have done well disputing SFI charges at every stage, usually quoting their own terms to them and again explaining that we (as an ISP) are not buying a metallic path.

Note: there is a logic for a charge for wasting time - reporting something that is not a fault, e.g. an engineers visits and finds the end users router is on fire - a charge on that basis, as a penalty of some sort, does make sense and makes sense to be passed on to whoever screwed up.

Why should SFI not exist now?

Now we have the crux here - we are still getting SFI charges, and still spending time disputing them, but for almost all lines SFI should not exist. To explain, that initial bullet point has changed for most lines now - because of the UK telephone service switch over from old copper pairs to the exchange.

  • Openreach sell a DATA service with handover on a fibre at the exchange, Openreach equipment in the street cabinet, and wires or fibre to the end user premises handed over as VDSL or Ethernet.
  • BTW buy that DATA service, and have equipment at the exchange, backhaul, etc..
  • Etc

What we have here is no longer a gap - no longer is Openreach selling a metallic path and BTW using it to sell a data service. If the data service is not working it is Openreach not providing something to spec, and so Openreach should fix that as a NORMAL FAULT INVESTIGATION. There is no gap for which SFI was invented to cover. Indeed, BTW should dispute every such SFI charge before even thinking of charging us (ISP).

There are still some ADSL, but they are quickly going, so SFI could exist for those lines for now - with the same original controversy of BTW trying to charge ISPs, but this is dwindling. Somehow BT try to charge for SFI for VDSL and FTTP services even now where it logically makes zero sense.

If BTW really are separate from Openreach now, they really have no excuse for not disputing every SFI charge related to FTTC or FTTP on this basis.

Giving BT some credit where it is due

One thing BT never had the nerve to do with all their changes to contract terms was make it so that their customer would have to pay them to fix a service they agreed to provide, but were failing to do so. Such a contract, even on a commercial basis, would be very challenging, and I would hope OFCOM could be persuaded to step in if that happened. The basic concept of I agree to pay you for a service and you agree to provide that service relies on the provider having to provide what they agreed, or they fix at their own cost. They tried a lot - the whole visual inspection is perhaps the most creative, but never that.

I may not be able to say that for all providers, but that is another story.

10:35

Productive dissatisfaction [Seth's Blog]

When focused on the things we can change, dissatisfaction is a powerful tool.

Accepting everything else–the parts we can’t or won’t change–reserves our energy for the places where it’s useful.

The tricky part is telling them apart and then focusing our agency and leverage on the useful.

Solving problems for others is how we create value.

06:14

Urgent: Tax billionaires' income from wealth [Richard Stallman's Political Notes]

US citizens: call on your state legislators to tax billionaires’ income from wealth.

In my letter I said that this should be in addition to taxing the wealth they already have.

Urgent: Corrupter's government-paid political ads [Richard Stallman's Political Notes]

US citizens: call on networks to stop airing the corrupter's government-paid political ads.

See the instructions for how to sign this letter campaign without running any nonfree JavaScript code--not trivial, but not hard.

Urgent: Tax the rich [Richard Stallman's Political Notes]

US citizens: call on 2026 Senate candidates: Tax the rich, don't cut Social Security!

See the instructions for how to sign this letter campaign without running any nonfree JavaScript code--not trivial, but not hard.

Urgent: Stop spending medical research funds on war [Richard Stallman's Political Notes]

US citizens: call on your congresscritter and senators to stop the cheater from spending medical research funds for weapons and war.

See the instructions for how to sign this letter campaign without running any nonfree JavaScript code--not trivial, but not hard.

US citizens: Join with this campaign to address this issue.

To phone your congresscritter about this, the main switchboard is +1-202-224-3121.

Please spread the word.

Urgent: Enforcement of Amazon's safety settlement [Richard Stallman's Political Notes]

US citizens: call on OSHA officials to enforce Amazon's safety settlement with its workers.

See the instructions for how to sign this letter campaign without running any nonfree JavaScript code--not trivial, but not hard.

Urgent: Protect temporary protection status for Haitians [Richard Stallman's Political Notes]

US citizens: call on your senators to protect temporary protection status for Haitians first thing, when the Senate is back in session.

See the instructions for how to sign this letter campaign without running any nonfree JavaScript code--not trivial, but not hard.

US citizens: Join with this campaign to address this issue.

To phone your congresscritter about this, the main switchboard is +1-202-224-3121.

Please spread the word.

Urgent: Investigate Meta [Richard Stallman's Political Notes]

US citizens: call on Congress to urge the IRS to investigate Meta and take the money back.

See the instructions for how to sign this letter campaign without running any nonfree JavaScript code--not trivial, but not hard.

Excluding news organizations from press conferences [Richard Stallman's Political Notes]

Australia's right-wing extremist party sometimes excludes specific news organizations from press conferences, apparently to prevent criticism.

The lunatic's antisocial media posts [Richard Stallman's Political Notes]

Robert Reich says he cannot find a plausible motive for what the lunatic posts on his antisocial media site. It makes no rational sense.

His article leads me to a speculation: he wants to keep his fanatical, blind-to-reality followers believing that he is constantly winning against every adversary. He figures that that will keep them giving him blind support.

Oil and gas extraction in the North Sea [Richard Stallman's Political Notes]

Why in the world is Burnham determined to start new oil and gas extraction in the North Sea? It won't provide much benefit except to the profiteers, and it will put the UK clearly in the planet-roasted camp.

Sanctions for Israel's crimes against Palestinians [Richard Stallman's Political Notes]

Prominent British rabbis and prominent Israelis welcome the UK's plans for sanctions against Israel's systematic crimes against Palestinians.

Sabotage of humanitarian aid [Richard Stallman's Political Notes]

The persecutor's funding cuts and sabotage of humanitarian aid around the world have resulted in 64 million people in distress going without aid.

Incredulity and accusations of bribery [Richard Stallman's Political Notes]

*[The corrupter]'s promise of a $5,000 "dividend" for every US citizen if Republicans retain control of the US Congress in November's midterm elections has sparked incredulity and accusations of bribery.*

To say that everyone will receive a payoff if a certain side wins an election is not exactly buying their votes, but it has much in common with that.

From past experience, when the bullshitter promises to give something worth money to citizens in general, he probably won't ever do it. He might change the plan so that the money ends up in the hands of rich people instead, like what happened to the "refunds" for increased tariffs that were canceled by a court. (These were refunded to importers, which had already collected these same amount from individual customers — so the importers got paid twice and the customers not at all.)

But I don't think this is mainly intended to influence voters. It may even backfire, there. I suspect the purpose is to pressure Republican elected officials to stand by the corrupter, lest committed magat voters reject them.

Climate "feedback loops" [Richard Stallman's Political Notes]

*Climate "feedback loops" could worsen global warming by 30%, study finds.*

There are many forms of feedback in climate parameters. I expect positive feedback to have devastating consequences as our generation of greenhouse gases increases.

Since we don't know about all of these feedback effects, it is hard to make overall predictions. But this general conclusion is likely to be valid:

The paper also reminds us why every fraction of a degree matters. The more we warm the planet, the more we risk activating natural processes that add still more greenhouse gases to the atmosphere. This makes rapid reductions in fossil fuel emissions even more urgent.

Positive feedbacks can also magnify the effects of conservation actions.

04:56

Man-Made Horrors, Part Two [Penny Arcade]

There's nothing I love more than a wiggling rune, God damn. As soon as I know there's gonna be a rune I stand up a little straighter, maybe groom my eyebrows real quick. I'm always trying to work one into the strip and this time I managed to accomplish it in the most meta way possible. It's powerful stuff.

02:35

Link [Scripting News]

Twitter: "Expect an avalanche of new software because the dam has broken, one person who knows what they want, and understands UI design can make a big complex app in 2-3 months. Over a weekend you can snap together an app from common UI concepts. Think of making software the same way you play with LEGOs."

00:42

Louis-Philippe Véronneau: Removing myself as a Lintian uploader in the next few weeks [Planet Debian]

A few days ago, a colleague reached out to me, asking if I could help draft a resolution on digital autonomy and free software for the upcoming renewal of our collective bargaining agreement. Although she's very politicised and generally a great individual, she is not a techie and we never really talked about these issues before.

This took me by surprise. I should have been rejoicing; no, I should have been the one who brought up this topic in our union. Wasn't I the technical expert on these issues? But alas, my first reaction when she came to me was to snicker and tell myself: "That's cute, but nothing's ever gonna change, Big Tech is too strong and our governments don't give a damn."

How sad and cynical is that? That's not the person I want to be.

Something in the Quebecois political landscape has shifted in the last few years with regards to tech. More and more "regular" people seem to be talking about the importance of digital autonomy, how government services shouldn't rely on Big Tech and how we should be using FOSS on hardware we actually control.

A few years ago, I would have been at the vanguard of this change. I would have been part of the creation of Données souveraines Québec. Heck, they are organising a whole conference next week and I'm not even going. How did this happen to me?

I first fell for Free Software for its political ideals: Knowledge Should Be Free, Cooperation Is More Efficient Than Competition, Centralisation Should Be Avoided When Possible, etc. I still believe in all of this, but somehow, after years of fighting for change in the tech world, I have retreated into technical work. I maintain Debian packages as a hobby and to scratch my own itch. I run services for myself and a few friends. I organise Debian User Group meetings.

To be clear, I haven't generally given up. I'm very politically active in my union and at work, I'm a good member of my housing cooperative and I'm still fighting against the industrialisation of natural spaces in my neighborhood. But when it comes time to defend freedom in the tech world, lately, I've just been shrugging and accepting I should use Microsoft Teams like every one else does. I want this to change and to do so, I need to free some time.

Lintian

Two years ago, I added myself to Lintian's Uploaders list. Up until then1, I enjoyed fixing little issues here and there and liked creating new tags to help out the Python Team, where most of my Debian time was spent.

Lintian was badly in need of a new maintainer and as I felt it was an important project, I decided to step in. 37 releases and about 160 closed bugs later2, I'm done.

To be honest, I haven't had much fun maintaining Lintian lately. Bugs keep piling on the BTS, so much so I have mostly been ignoring them for the past few months. In fact, most of the actual work triaging, writing code and fixing bug has been done by Nilesh Patra for a while now.

All this to say, if you care about Lintian, you should consider adding yourself to the Uploaders list, as I'm out and Nilesh can't do all the work by himself.

He's a great person to work with and since I don't want to suddenly leave him all alone, I'll be sticking around for a few more weeks in the hope someone else will volunteer to help out. A smooth transition with a new co-maintainer would really be nice!

If you're interested, don't hesitate to reach out to me on IRC or by email.


  1. My first technical commit to Lintian was nearly 7 years ago! Crazy how time flies. ↩

  2. Mostly closed by other people than I! ↩

Friday, 09 October

23:56

Dirk Eddelbuettel: RcppSimdJson 0.1.16 on CRAN: Much Faster Again! [Planet Debian]

A brand new release 0.1.16 of the RcppSimdJson package is now on CRAN, has been built for r2u, and is updated on r-universe.

RcppSimdJson wraps the fantastic and genuinely impressive simdjson library by Daniel Lemire and collaborators. Via very clever algorithmic engineering to obtain largely branch-free code, coupled with modern C++ and newer compiler instructions, it results in parsing gigabytes of JSON parsed per second which is quite mindboggling. The best-case performance is ‘faster than CPU speed’ as use of parallel SIMD instructions and careful branch avoidance can lead to less than one cpu cycle per byte parsed; see the video of the talk by Daniel Lemire at QCon.

This version updates to the recent 5.0.2 upstream release with improved performance. Given the strong focus on performance, this release also alters some of the R and C++ interfaces to be more direct. Rcpp generally aims for a balance between readable / maintainable code and good performance; this moves the dial closer to strong performance gains. As Daniel noted in a table in the (main) PR for this release, this now consistently beats yyjsonr, and improves considerably over the previous release of this package. I had made some smaller interim upgrades earlier (without a CRAN releases), and made a number of minor standard packaging updates.

The short NEWS entry for this release follows.

Changes in version 0.1.16 (2026-10-09)

  • simdjson was upgraded to versions 4.6.1 and 4.6.3 (Dirk in #100 and #102 fixing #99 and #101)

  • simdjson was upgraded to version 5.0.2 (Daniel in #104)

  • A number of small tweaks to the Rcpp interface were made too (Daniel in #104)

  • Diagnostics for gcc and clang are not suppressed per CRAN Policy (Dirk in #106 closing #105)

  • The continuous integration matrix was extended to g++ version 15 and 16 (Dirk in #108 closing #107)

  • A few minor packaging nags were address (Dirk in #109)

Courtesy of my CRANberries, there is also a diffstat report for this release. For questions, suggestions, or issues please use the issue tracker at the GitHub repo.

This post by Dirk Eddelbuettel originated on his Thinking inside the box blog. If you like this or other open-source work I do, you can now sponsor me at GitHub.

23:07

View From a Hotel Window 10/9/26: New York City (Again) [Whatever]

Wait, wasn’t I just in NYC? Indeed I was, and now I’m here again, this time for New York Comic Con, where tomorrow I have a panel, a signing and another signing. You should totally come to see me. After this I probably won’t be in NYC for a bit, certainly not again this year. Come get me while the getting is good!

— JS

22:14

The Big Idea: Dmitri Lincoln Melhorn [Whatever]

It seems like wherever there are ashes, there’s something new to rise up out of them. Author Dmitri Lincoln Melhorn explores these phoenix-esque phenomena in the Big Idea for his newest novel, Archipelago of Light. When the future is in the new generations hands, what will the kids do with it?

DMITRI LINCOLN MELHORN:

In April 1942, my dad and his mom emerged from their basement to find their home in ashes from British bombs. My dad was not yet two. He remembers the 1940s in snatches: begging for potatoes, sneaking through forests surrounded by machine-gun fire. At six, he was jealous of his baby sister: to keep her quiet, she got the only honey they had as he pushed her pram through the Black Forest snow.

He arrived in the States in 1952. He’d been a homeless war refugee for a decade, and had no money, no father, and no English. At thirteen, he would have been considered “a young male of fighting age” in most places and times. America transformed his life.

Other than better food and healthcare, my dad did not change physically, but his functional intelligence multiplied. He didn’t get smarter; he joined a smarter network. The United States itself was the greatest supercomputer in world history: its norms and institutions wired together millions of native-born Americans with immigrants like him, and like my Jewish mother’s forebears. My dad went to college in Cleveland. He met my mom at graduate school in Berkeley. He became a biophysicist.

What if Pax Americana is over, because America itself leaves the free world? What if the civilizational supercomputers of the West raise their drawbridges against those at the margins, just as AI, climate change, authoritarianism, and war create tens or hundreds of millions of desperate people?

I explore those questions in my novel, Archipelago of Light. After a decade of effort to shape America’s response to both MAGA and AI, I turned to fiction to map out the possible future. In my book, the White House has allied with Russia; China smothers dissent with chemicals and AI; and global elites use their power to distance themselves from the rest of humanity.

My book surprised me. I started with worldbuilding briefs, character briefs, elite fractures, and enlightened philanthropists. I wrote triumphs for the heroes and redemption arcs for the antiheroes. But after hammering on the drafts to meet my own standards of realism, the heroic storylines fell apart. The antiheroes stayed true to their incentives and characters, while the protagonists born in the 1970s and 1980s mostly just fended off chaos. The best they could do was pass the baton.

That became the big idea of the book: if enlightened civilization survives this moment, it will be because new people, who today are children at the margins of the world order, reinvent the Enlightenment for themselves.

The spine of the book is Reem al-Jabri, a Syrian refugee we meet in a Jordanian camp. In 2028, a Western philanthropy hands eleven-year-old Reem a tablet whose AI copilot is locked to her skin chemistry, useless to anyone who steals it. She uploads the only photo she has of her mother, “sitting by the Aleppo window, headscarf slightly askew, laughing at something outside the frame,” and names her AI copilot Zari, after her mama and her grandmother. The third Zari. Then she kneels and draws nodes in the dust. “Many tablets working together,” she says. “Like the camp. Many weak people working together could be strong.”

Reem’s mother died because people stole her medicine and no one stopped them. Loaded with the great texts of the Enlightenment, her copilot Zari can teach her anything: Rousseau, Montesquieu, which tribunals worked and which became as cruel as what they replaced. But as Reem puts it, “learning doesn’t matter if nobody believes you.” So the children start with stolen water. They document the theft and send the evidence to every administrator, donor, and reporter at once. “We make cover-ups more expensive than action.”

Reem and the other children do not have an army, or wealth, or frontier models and data centers. Existing laws and bureaucracies pretend to protect them, but end up exploiting them. One piece at a time, from truth markets to justice systems, Reem and her contemporaries build their own civilization, their own supercomputer, out of the humanity and AI copilots of millions of desperate refugees. Even when the rich world invites her to join them, she persists in building something new.

Along the way, the refugees document a predator: a UN protection officer. The officials who receive their evidence express concern and change nothing. Reem and her peers argue their way to the next step: when every authority looks away, doing nothing is also a verdict, and the refugees pay for it. At thirteen, she develops the Dark Red Protocol, for cases where the evidence is complete, the process is exhausted, and the crime is capital. The children enforce their own verdicts, not as a mob but as reluctant executioners.

Meanwhile, the criminal mastermind Sofia Morales, herself a trafficking survivor, builds another kind of network: Memory Churches, where the bereaved hear their dead speak, and believe them. Reem understands Sofia’s appeal: “People choose the voice that loves them over the voice that’s accurate.” She says it as someone whose own tutor wears her mother’s face.

My novel does not pretend that the children are  innocent. Only by questioning themselves can they survive and win their own freedom, without becoming what they fight. When the course of the book took human lives, I grieved. But by that time, I knew there was no truth in a version where everyone survived this transition.

My dad climbed out of a basement and found his home incinerated. A decade later, he found a network that multiplied everything he was. Reem’s generation has no such network waiting for them. They have cheap tablets, a camp full of each other and AI copilots, and the voices of the people they lost. Painfully, through courage but also moral compromise, they rebuild the free world, the Archipelago of Light.  


Archipelago of Light: Amazon|Barnes & Noble|Bookshop|P&T Knitwear|Vroman’s

Authors socials: Website|Instagram|LinkedIn

21:35

Reproducible Builds (diffoscope): diffoscope 333 released [Planet Debian]

The diffoscope maintainers are pleased to announce the release of diffoscope version 333. This version includes the following changes:

[ Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues ]
* Add support for showing differences in POSIX.1-2001 PAX headers within .tar
  files.

[ Chris Lamb ]
* Re-order various parts of the tar comparator to make it easier to
  progressively delve into its functionality.
* Reflect that the use of the "case-match" language feature requires at least
  Python 3.10+. This can be worked around if it causes problems - let us know.
* Update various copyright years.

You find out more by visiting the project homepage.

Friday Squid Blogging: I Caught a Squid [Schneier on Security]

On Wednesday I spent a day fishing, on a small boat out of Gloucester, MA. We caught many cod (none of which we could keep), and a bunch of hake and mackerel (all of which we could keep). And…I caught a squid! Near as I can tell, it’s a longfin squid, sometimes called a Boston squid (Doryteuthis (Amerigo) pealeii).

That night I cooked it over a barbecue grill—hot and fast. Delicious.

20:49

Pluralistic: Thwarted (09 Oct 2026) [Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow]

->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->-> Top Sources: None -->

Today's links

  • Thwarted: Behold the awesome destructive power of a fully operational billionaire.
  • Hey look at this: Delights to delectate.
  • Object permanence: Anthrax v National Inquirer; Grey goo v Second Life; Predictive policing v actual crime; Spooky cookies; California v algorithmic price-fixing; Tivo self-destructs; Disney exec endorses piracy; TSA v geologists; Handheld printer; Mandatory DRM for all Canadian music sales; Iceweasel; "Snuff"; "Shade the Changing Girl"; Latam surveillance; Scotland Yard brands encryption terrorism; RBS slaughtered 10k small businesses to seize and sell their assets; Dead Letters.
  • Upcoming appearances: Calgary, Winnipeg, Paris, Vancouver, Victoria, Ottawa, Kilkenny, Sheffield, Oxford, Montreal.
  • Recent appearances: Where I've been.
  • Latest books: You keep readin' em, I'll keep writin' 'em.
  • Upcoming books: Like I said, I'll keep writin' 'em.
  • Colophon: All the rest.



The Warner Brother tower posed against a vintage map of Burbank, keeling over, tearing up a huge clot of sod and concrete. Standing atop of the tower, forcing it down, is a sad, spavined donkey in Democratic Party livery. Being crushed under the tower is the California flag bear, with blood pouring out of its eye and mouth.

Thwarted (permalink)

There are many ways in which every billionaire is a policy failure, but the most corrosive and destructive way in which billionaires are policy failures is this: billionaires, despite being unelected and unaccountable, possess the power to control – and ruin – millions of peoples' lives.

Despite what the Prosperity Gospel and the Efficient Market Hypothesis would have you believe, having billions of dollars is in no way a reliable predictor that you also possess the wisdom to unilaterally dictate how thousands or millions of other people must live their lives, and that dictatorial power is most the tangible effect of being a billionaire.

Billionaireism is many things, but above all else, it is the power to do whatever *you* want to do, at the expense of whatever *other* people want to do. To be a billionaire is to live a life unthwarted, above the power of your workers, your neighbors, or your government and its laws. It is the right to get high on your own supply. It is the right to live a life in which no one ever calls you on your bullshit.

Billionaires aspire to live a one-sided libertarian fantasy in which they have the unlimited right to do whatever they want, and *you* have the right to do whatever they tell you to do.

There has always been a group of people who refused to acknowledge that other people have perfectly valid reasons for wanting to pursue their own goals rather than theirs. We call most of those people "toddlers" and devote sizable social effort to helping them outgrow this belief. Billionaires, on the other hand, command resources that allow *them* to devote sizable effort to getting *us* to acknowledge that *they* should be able to tell *us* what to do.

This is why billionaires love neoclassical economics, with its doctrine of "revealed preferences," which holds that the only true way to understand someone's preferences is to ignore what they *say* and only pay attention to what they *do*. It's a belief that can only be adopted by people who suffer the self-inflicted neurological injury you get from doing an economics degree, which renders the victim incapable of perceiving or reasoning about power. To believe in "revealed preferences" is to observe someone who has sold their kidney to pay the rent and marvel at this person who has a revealed preference for only having one kidney:

https://pluralistic.net/2026/03/30/players-of-games/#know-when-to-fold-em

"Revealed preferences" is the economist's version of the bully who grabs your arm and starts whacking you with your own hand while shouting, "stop hitting yourself!" The ideological purpose that "revealed preferences" fills is letting billionaires live a life unthwarted. It's a life where they thwart everyone else, but still claim to be believers in "freedom."

This is what Peter Thiel meant when he wrote that "democracy is incompatible with freedom." In a democracy, the people who you exercise coercive power over are able to band together to create public institutions that act as a check on your power. For Thiel to maximize his freedom (to do things like spying on us and crushing our journalistic outlets), he must prevent all of *us* from voting, lest we vote to take away those cherished freedoms of his:

https://www.cato-unbound.org/2009/04/13/peter-thiel/education-libertarian/

We're told that as mere mortals, we must inevitably submit to "death and taxes." Billionaires have long since so corrupted our political system that they need not pay taxes:

https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/S/bo256019296.html

They have (practically speaking) infinite wealth, which means that they have practically infinite power, including the power to block any democratic attempt to limit their wealth (and thus their power):

https://www.hamiltonnolan.com/p/the-war-against-accumulated-capital

Having vanquished taxes, the ultra-rich are now committed to defeating death as well, making themselves easy marks for the world's weirdest cult leaders and grifters, who promise them a mix of physical and digital immortality:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0oVSnaINJ30

The fact that billionaires are such suckers, so often, is the strongest argument against billionaireism. Billionaires aren't just powerful, they're also *fallible*. We're *all* fallible, of course, but only billionaires get to impose their foolish ideas on so many other people, who have no say in the matter.

Henry Ford thought that he was so rich that he could build Brazilian worker housing whose windows faced the same direction as the worker housing he'd built in Dearborn, Michigan. He literally thought that being rich meant that he could ignore the entire concept of *the Earth's axial tilt* (he was wrong):

https://memex.craphound.com/2010/06/02/fordlandia-novelistic-history-of-henry-fords-doomed-midwestern-town-in-the-amazon-jungle/

Of course that was the least of Ford's follies. Ford also believed in a secret Jewish conspiracy to control humanity:

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/henryford-antisemitism/

And despite the fact that Ford was so often demonstrably as thick as pigshit, no one was able to stop him from hiring soldiers to literally slaughter anyone who tried to limit his ability to tell other people how to live their lives:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Overpass

Ford is no exception. Elon Musk believes in the same racist garbage as Henry Ford…but he also believes that if you're rich enough, you can simply wish away *geometry* and *physics*:

https://pluralistic.net/2025/07/24/geometry-hates-cars/#dogshit-unit-economics

More than anyone else, Musk illustrates the way that being insulated from people who can thwart you leads to absolute ruination. Every terrible idea Musk has, he gets to act on. This has all kinds of negative impacts, including the very real possibility that some day your house will be crushed by his flaming rocketry debris:

https://www.vice.com/en/article/texas-residents-are-suing-spacex-over-terrestrial-bombardment/

That's small potatoes, though: Musk's wrong ideas, combined with his billionaire's impunity, also allowed him to murder hundreds of thousands of the world's poorest children:

https://hsph.harvard.edu/news/usaid-shutdown-has-led-to-hundreds-of-thousands-of-deaths/

Billionaireism is fractally terrible. By definition, the kind of person who will inflict the kinds of harms needed to amass billions of dollars in pursuit of total impunity is someone who will use that impunity to hurt even more people. Anyone who fails to outgrow a toddler's insistence on subordinating others to their will *should not be allowed to subordinate anyone to their will*.

Billionaire dilettantes aren't like regular dilettantes. Anyone can be a crank, but billionaire cranks have the force-multiplier of money and the impunity it brings. These allow a billionaire to turn his crackpot ideas into an unstoppable force that crushes public education:

https://pluralistic.net/2026/03/09/autocrats-of-trade-2/#witness-the-firepower-of-this-fully-armed-and-operational-battle-station

It also lets billionaires (including the billionaire ruining public education) kidnap and rape more than a thousand girls on a private island:

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-to-know-about-bill-gates-relationship-with-jeffrey-epstein-as-he-is-interviewed-in-house-probe

Whatever crank whim a rich person has, we all have to live with. Take Barre Seid: the 94 year old billionaire made his fortune manufacturing electronics, and then donated $1.6b to fund "attack philanthropy" in order to undermine belief in climate change and prevent any action from being taken to avert it:

https://www.propublica.org/article/barre-seid-heartland-institute-hillsdale-college-gmu

Seid is one of the main reasons we're experiencing the super El Nino. He's not just in the top 0.1% of wealth-horders, he's also in the top 0.1% of people we can blame for the *twelve foot sea-level rise* that is currently wiping Long Beach off the map:

https://ktla.com/news/local-news/long-beach-boardwalk-collapse-rachel-surf/

Henry Ford didn't believe in the planet's axial tilt. Elon Musk doesn't believe in geometry.

Barre Seid doesn't believe in climate change. But Barre Seid *does* believe something: Barre Seid believes in *rats*.

For *three years*, Seid has paid a small army of goons to wander the area around Chicago's Lincoln Park, scattering handfuls of high-grade nuts on the ground, which have drawn flocks of pigeons and swarms of rats. Rats are everywhere. Everything is covered in pigeon shit. Seid has been repeatedly fined and cited and warned, and he's carried on turning the neighborhood into an uncontrolled vermin breeding facility:

https://gizmodo.com/a-billionaire-is-fueling-a-rat-explosion-in-a-chicago-park-in-the-stupidest-way-possible-2000823641

Whether or not the people who live, work and play in Lincoln Park want to be swarmed by rats and slip in thick slicks of pigeon shit is irrelevant. Seid can afford to pay any fine the city levies against him (a fine is a price, and he's a billionaire), which means there's no practical reason Seid has to ever stop. He has the freedom to operate unthwarted in his every desire, including his desire to carpet an entire neighborhood in feces, so everyone else lacks the freedom to live without pigeon shit and rats.

That's the thing about billionaires: as Peter Thiel wrote, democracy *is* incompatible with freedom (to be a billionaire). The fact that Barre Seid's desire to transform Lincoln Park into a pigeon-shit manure lagoon is wildly unpopular with Chicagoans is irrelevant. You can't vote Barre Seid out of office, because no one elected him Pigeon Shit Czar. He has assumed that office by right of conquest.

Our lives are full of horrible, extremely unpopular things that we can't vote away because billionaires like them. Take the decision to allow Larry Ellison and his failson to buy and kill Warner Studios. That's an incredibly unpopular idea, especially in California, where Warner, Paramount and the Ellisons are all based. Despite the fact that we all hate this idea, Ellison gets to do it, because he is unthwartable:

https://pluralistic.net/2026/09/22/happy-chudmas/#baloney-in-our-slacks

Some of California's most powerful Democrats promised to stop the merger. Instead, they signed away California's future because they decided that they weren't powerful enough to thwart a billionaire:

https://prospect.org/2026/10/08/democrats-who-let-trumps-oligarchs-buy-hollywood-warner-bros-david-ellison-gavin-newsom/

The Warnermount disaster demonstrates the fundamental flaw in libertarianism. Even if you're the kind of Musk-addled libertarian who can't open your copy of *Atlas Shrugged* anymore because the pages are all stuck together and you think the only role for the state is enforcing contracts, you *still need the state to be able to enforce those contracts*. If corporations or even individual billionaires amass more power than the state, then they can always tell the state's contract enforcers to fuck off.

The ref must be more powerful than the players on the field, so the smallest government you can have is determined by the size of the largest corporation and the wealth of the richest billionaire you're willing to tolerate.

The world is in *really* bad shape right now, but it doesn't have to be. As Mamdani has shown us, it's not that hard to run a well-administered, advanced technological civilization. Fixing potholes and making transit work and enforcing housing rules isn't rocket surgery. We know how to do those things – we just don't do them because billionaires don't want us to, and they are unthwartable:

https://yourlocalepidemiologist.substack.com/p/the-revolutionary-art-of-fixing-the

We let the most greedy, most ruthless people among us pursue their toddler's quest for an unthwarted life to the expense of any semblance of competent administration, and now we are *fucked*. That's why people are so angry about AI: there's nothing wrong with the idea of automating some tasks through advanced statistical techniques, but the reason so much of the world's scarce resources have been allocated to the AI buildout is that billionaires are infinitely horny for a technology that will let them sideline expertise in favor of money:

https://pluralistic.net/2026/10/06/nonfungible/#theory-free

After all, experts get to thwart billionaires. They can refuse to apply their expertise to a billionaire's folly. The kind of AI that the industry is pursuing today is predicated on the idea that you can just ask a computer to come up with "theory-free inferences" that will let it run a factory, drive a car, or perform medicine, without knowing *anything*, just by pulling statistical correlations out of unimaginably vast data-sets.

At some level, people get this. They understand that AI and billionaireism are intimately connected – that the reason the sector is on track to lose about a trillion dollars this year is that for billionaires, a trillion bucks is a small price to pay for an unthwartable life.


Hey look at this (permalink)

* McSWEENEY’S ISSUE 84 (ARTISAN’S TOOL ROLL) https://store.mcsweeneys.net/products/mcsweeney-s-issue-84?taxon_id=3

* Trump’s Cascade of Canceled Corporate Enforcement Against Over 200 Corporations https://www.citizen.org/article/trump-cascade-canceled-enforcement-200-corporations/

* FEAR OF MUSIC (SUPER DELUXE EDITION) https://store.talkingheadsofficial.com/collections/fear-of-music

* The Monopoly on the Open Road https://prospect.org/2026/10/07/monopoly-on-the-open-road-patrick-industries-rv/

* Paramount Stock CRUSHED After Merger with Warner Discovery Closes https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/raises-for-me-layoffs-for-thee-the



A shelf of leatherbound history books with a gilt-stamped series title, 'The World's Famous Events.'

Object permanence (permalink)

#25yrsago National Inquirer shuts offices after anthrax delivery https://web.archive.org/web/20011221185744/https://www.etonline.com/celebrity/a6975.htm

#20yrsago Grey Goo melting online world Second Life https://web.archive.org/web/20061023190111/http://blog.secondlife.com/2006/10/08/grid-set-back-to-linden-login-only-some-goo-missed/
#20yrsago TiVo’s “self-destruct button” destructs https://web.archive.org/web/20061014132917/http://reviews.cnet.com/4531-10921_7-6650194.html

#20yrsago Disney exec: Piracy is just a business model https://www.netribution.co.uk/stories/cross-media/disney-co-chair-recognises-piracy-is-a-business-model

#20yrsago TSA confiscates geologist’s rock https://web.archive.org/web/20061019132853/https://www.courant.com/news/opinion/op_ed/hc-thorson1005.artoct05,0,777555.column?coll=hc-headlines-oped

#20yrsago Handheld printer made from a toner cartridge https://spritesmods.com/?art=inker&page=4

#20yrsago Panicked chefs propose copyrighted food https://megnut.com/2006/10/10/keep-recipes-free/

#20yrsago Canadian music proposal would *require* DRM for online tunes https://web.archive.org/web/20061022201913/https://www.jeremydebeer.ca/content/view/95/2/

#20yrsago Iceweasel, a free-as-in-speech version of Firefox https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debian–Mozilla_trademark_dispute

#15yrsago Pratchett’s Snuff: a rural/nautical tale of drawing-room gentility, racism, and justice https://memex.craphound.com/2011/10/10/pratchetts-snuff-a-rural-nautical-tale-of-drawing-room-gentility-racism-and-justice/

#10yrsago Shade the Changing Girl: amazing, gorgeous new comic about aliens and mean girls https://memex.craphound.com/2016/10/10/shade-the-changing-girl-amazing-gorgeous-new-comic-about-aliens-and-mean-girls/

#10yrsago Massive report details the surveillance powers of 12 Central and South American nations https://necessaryandproportionate.org/principles/

#10yrsago Scotland Yard charge: teaching people to use cryptography is an act of terrorism https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/10/cops-charge-cardiff-man-with-terrorist-crypto-training-offence/

#10yrsago RBS deliberately crushed more than 1,000 healthy UK businesses to seize and sell their assets https://www.buzzfeed.com/heidiblake/dash-for-cash?utm_term=.iq9ndLB5#.udNbypOJ

#10yrsago Though crime happens everywhere, predictive policing tools send cops to poor/black neighborhoods https://www.mic.com/articles/156286/crime-prediction-tool-pred-pol-only-amplifies-racially-biased-policing-study-shows

#10yrsago Bake: spooky chocolate chip cookies https://www.instructables.com/Creepy-Chocolate-Chip-Cookies/

#5yrsago Dead letters https://pluralistic.net/2021/10/10/dead-letters/

#1yrago A disenshittification moment from the land of mass storage https://pluralistic.net/2025/10/10/synology/#how-about-nah

#1yrago California bans algorithmic price-fixing https://pluralistic.net/2025/10/09/pricewars/#adam-smith-communist


Upcoming appearances (permalink)

A photo of me onstage, giving a speech, pounding the podium.

* Calgary: Wordfest, Oct 8
https://wordfest.com/2026/show/wordfest-presents-cory-doctorow-2026/

* Winnipeg: McNally Robinson, Oct 9
https://www.mcnallyrobinson.com/event-18991/An-Evening-with-Cory-Doctorow

* Paris: Slow Tech Summit, Oct 15
https://slowtechsummit.com/

* Vancouver: Read, Resist, Repair, Rejoice (Vancouver Writers Festival), Oct 19
https://writersfest.bc.ca/festival-event-2026/01

* Victoria: Munro's Books, Oct 20
https://www.munrobooks.com/events/6113620261020

* Vancouver: Life After AI (Vancouver Writers Festival), Oct 22
https://writersfest.bc.ca/festival-event-2026/46

* Ottawa: Life After AI (Ottawa Writers Festival), Oct 24
https://writersfestival.org/event/life-after-ai

* Kilkenny (Kilkenomics), Nov 6-8
https://kilkenomics.com/

* Vancouver: Enshittification (Sid Williams Theatre Society), Nov 10
https://www.sidwilliamstheatre.com/events/cory-doctorow-talks-enshittification/

* Vancouver: BC Policy Solutions Gala, Nov 12
https://bcpolicy.ca/gala/

* Sheffield: Reverse Centaur at Juno Books, Nov 25
https://www.outsavvy.com/event/40274/cory-doctorow-in-conversation

* Oxford: Bennett Oxford Symposium on Open Code in Science, Dec 9
https://www.bennett.ox.ac.uk/events/2026-bennett-institute-symposium/

* Montreal: World Science Fiction Convention, Sep 2-6
https://montreal2027.ca/en



A screenshot of me at my desk, doing a livecast.

Recent appearances (permalink)

* Terms of Service with Clare Duffy (CNN)
https://www.cnn.com/audio/podcasts/terms-of-service-with-clare-duffy/episodes/458ce968-af5d-11f0-b539-13ed2afe25f8

* AI, Work, and Power (Software Engineering Daily)
AI, Work, and Power https://softwareengineeringdaily.com/podcasts/cory-doctorow-on-ai-work-and-power/

* AI, Corporate Power, and the Fight for Worker Control (Plutopia)
https://plutopia.io/cory-doctorow-ai-corporate-power-and-the-fight-for-worker-control/

* How to Think About AI—Before It’s Too Late (Daniel Solove)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0xR3uEgGcc

* Could Tech Bosses Destroy Life As We Know It? (Politics JOE)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PL4VktU0SgY



A grid of my books with Will Stahle covers..

Latest books (permalink)

* "The Reverse-Centaur's Guide to AI," a short book about being a better AI critic, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, June 2026
https://us.macmillan.com/books/9780374621568/thereversecentaursguidetolifeafterai/

* "Canny Valley": A limited edition collection of the collages I create for Pluralistic, self-published, September 2025 https://pluralistic.net/2025/09/04/illustrious/#chairman-bruce

* "Enshittification: Why Everything Suddenly Got Worse and What to Do About It," Farrar, Straus, Giroux, October 7 2025
https://us.macmillan.com/books/9780374619329/enshittification/

* "Picks and Shovels": a sequel to "Red Team Blues," about the heroic era of the PC, Tor Books (US), Head of Zeus (UK), February 2025 (https://us.macmillan.com/books/9781250865908/picksandshovels).

* "The Bezzle": a sequel to "Red Team Blues," about prison-tech and other grifts, Tor Books (US), Head of Zeus (UK), February 2024 (thebezzle.org).

* "The Lost Cause:" a solarpunk novel of hope in the climate emergency, Tor Books (US), Head of Zeus (UK), November 2023 (http://lost-cause.org).

* "The Internet Con": A nonfiction book about interoperability and Big Tech (Verso) September 2023 (http://seizethemeansofcomputation.org). Signed copies at Book Soup (https://www.booksoup.com/book/9781804291245).

* "Red Team Blues": "A grabby, compulsive thriller that will leave you knowing more about how the world works than you did before." Tor Books http://redteamblues.com.

* "Chokepoint Capitalism: How to Beat Big Tech, Tame Big Content, and Get Artists Paid, with Rebecca Giblin", on how to unrig the markets for creative labor, Beacon Press/Scribe 2022 https://chokepointcapitalism.com



A cardboard book box with the Macmillan logo.

Upcoming books (permalink)

* "The Post-American Internet," a geopolitical sequel of sorts to *Enshittification*, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2027

* "Unauthorized Bread": a middle-grades graphic novel adapted from my novella about refugees, toasters and DRM, FirstSecond, April 20, 2027

* "Enshittification, Why Everything Suddenly Got Worse and What to Do About It" (the graphic novel), Firstsecond, 2027

* "The Memex Method," Farrar, Straus, Giroux, 2027



Colophon (permalink)

Today's top sources:

Currently writing:

* “Once Is Enemy Action,” a science fiction novel about the origins of modern technofascism. Today's words: 537 (23966 total).

* "The Post-American Internet," a sequel to "Enshittification," about the better world the rest of us get to have now that Trump has torched America. Fourth draft completed. Submitted to editor.

* A Little Brother short story about DIY insulin PLANNING


This work – excluding any serialized fiction – is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. That means you can use it any way you like, including commercially, provided that you attribute it to me, Cory Doctorow, and include a link to pluralistic.net.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Quotations and images are not included in this license; they are included either under a limitation or exception to copyright, or on the basis of a separate license. Please exercise caution.


How to get Pluralistic:

Blog (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

Pluralistic.net

Newsletter (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

https://pluralistic.net/plura-list

Mastodon (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

https://mamot.fr/@pluralistic

Bluesky (no ads, possible tracking and data-collection):

https://bsky.app/profile/doctorow.pluralistic.net

Medium (no ads, paywalled):

https://doctorow.medium.com/

Tumblr (mass-scale, unrestricted, third-party surveillance and advertising):

https://mostlysignssomeportents.tumblr.com/tagged/pluralistic

"When life gives you SARS, you make sarsaparilla" -Joey "Accordion Guy" DeVilla

READ CAREFULLY: By reading this, you agree, on behalf of your employer, to release me from all obligations and waivers arising from any and all NON-NEGOTIATED agreements, licenses, terms-of-service, shrinkwrap, clickwrap, browsewrap, confidentiality, non-disclosure, non-compete and acceptable use policies ("BOGUS AGREEMENTS") that I have entered into with your employer, its partners, licensors, agents and assigns, in perpetuity, without prejudice to my ongoing rights and privileges. You further represent that you have the authority to release me from any BOGUS AGREEMENTS on behalf of your employer.

ISSN: 3066-764X

19:14

19:00

Link [Scripting News]

Claude Code can publish reports in Markdown files. Here's an example, a report Claude did for me. An obvious next step but a big one. AI spilling out onto the web, doing the job that web CMSes now do. There's been so little movement in this space, but now things are moving very quickly.

This Week in AI: More Capability, More Responsibility [Radar]

AI systems are gaining more autonomy while governments, companies, and researchers are still working out how much oversight they need. On the latest episode of This Week in AI, we covered the US debate over AI governance, new frontier models, persistent agents, world models, and practical uses for AI in healthcare and disaster response.

AI oversight is moving beyond company promises

The Trump administration announced a voluntary agreement with major AI companies that calls for internal safety monitoring, external audits, and independent board reviews. Because the agreement carries no legal enforcement, it raises a familiar question about how far self-regulation can go when companies are developing increasingly powerful systems.

Government agencies are also testing what existing law can do. The Federal Trade Commission launched an investigation into OpenAI, Anthropic, and other AI companies focused on potential consumer risks. Cases like these could help establish whether current consumer protection laws are enough or whether AI will require a more specialized regulatory framework.

For technical leaders, regulation can influence how organizations evaluate models, document risks, manage access, and choose vendors. As AI moves deeper into business processes, teams will need governance practices that can withstand outside review.

AI systems are taking on longer, more autonomous work

OpenAI just released Dots, its “proactive assistant” designed to retain context, work across applications, pursue multiple goals, and act independently. To do that work without waiting for a prompt, Dots needs standing access to the apps and data it works across. That also increases the amount of personal data an agent can reach and raises the cost of mistakes or misuse.

Google is also extending how long a model can work on a task. The company says Gemini 4 Argon can generate up to a million output tokens in a single response, far beyond the typical output limits of current frontier models. The goal is to let a model stay with long multistep work such as extensive coding or financial and legal analysis. Longer-running models and persistent agents aren’t the same thing, but both let AI finish more work without handing control back to a person.

As agents act more on their own, they need to anticipate the consequences of their actions. That becomes even more important when AI moves beyond software and begins acting in the physical world. World models aim to teach AI how these environments work, including cause and effect, which is why many researchers see them as building blocks for robotics and physical AI. World Labs (recently acquired by AMD) is developing spatial intelligence models for interactive 3D environments, while British startup Worldmodeldata has licensed nearly 1 million hours of video game data paired with player actions. Researchers from NVIDIA, MIT, and Oxford also introduced Physis-Lang, which uses descriptions of physical causes and effects to help video models learn why events happen. Researchers still don’t know which training approach will work best, so they’re testing several kinds of data and model design.

AI support experts in high-stakes work

Anthropic’s Claude is helping teams responding to an Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo organize daily reports, compare forecasting models, analyze genomic information, and support vaccine research. Researchers have also developed a Spanish-language speech model that may eventually help identify accelerated biological aging and early signs of dementia. Mayo Clinic researchers built a model that identifies patterns associated with elevated pancreatic cancer risk years before diagnosis. Following severe flooding in Nepal, local teams used AI to match reports of missing people with victim lists and map damaged buildings using satellite imagery.

Together, these examples show how AI can be used for good by helping people work through complex information faster and, ultimately, save lives, while keeping qualified experts responsible for the final decisions.

What’s next

As AI takes on more work and enters higher-stakes settings, organizations will need clearer answers about access and accountability. They’ll also need to decide where human judgment remains necessary as systems become more capable.

Join us again next Monday for another episode of This Week in AI, when we’ll dive into more of the news, issues, and key developments shaping the AI era. And check back each Friday for the latest episode, or watch on YouTube, Spotify, Apple, or wherever you get your podcasts.

18:35

Python 3.15 released [LWN.net]

Version 3.15 of the Python programming language has been released. Notable changes in this release include the addition of the sentinel and frozendict built-in types, the use of UTF-8 encoding by default, package start-up configuration files, as well as improvements in the experimental JIT compiler. See the "What's new in Python 3.15" article for an in-depth look at new features in this release, and the changelog for a full list of changes.

[$] Adding kernel control-flow-integrity checking to GCC [LWN.net]

While many developers are struggling to keep up with the flood of vulnerability reports, others are still focused on preventing those reports from happening in the first place. Control-flow integrity (CFI) is the term for preventing (or at least detecting) exploits that divert the flow of control from its intended paths. At the 2026 GNU Tools Cauldron, Kees Cook presented his changes to the GCC compiler suite to support forward-edge CFI for the kernel.

18:28

mix tapes, live shows, and storytime. [WIL WHEATON dot NET]

It’s been a long time since I made a mixtape, but I remember making them all the time when I was a kid. I rarely had the opportunity to make them for another person, but that didn’t stop me from making endless awesome mixes to block out the world on my Walkman.

I’ve made a ton of public playlists over the years, but every last one of them is meant to be shuffled. They don’t have a cohesive theme, tell a story, or do anything that particular flavor of mixtape did for us back in the 80s. They are more like radio stations, I suppose. I’ve received lots of compliments for my Generic New Wave, and my KROQ Flashback playlists from people who experience them that way.

But I haven’t made a playlist with intention, to be listened to in a particular order, in well over a decade, probably two, until I got it into my head recently that it was time.

So I made two sides of a 60 minute cassette. The first side is Boys Drool, featuring a lot of the women in rock who I can’t stop listening to right now, with a focus on punk and hardcore. Due to the time limit, it’s far from complete, and it kind of insists on a second volume with a different focus.

The second side is Wax and Wane. This is classic goth, dark and moody, meant to listen to while you come down from dancing your face off with the ladies on side one. Did you know that Bela Lugosi’s Dead was recorded and mixed live, done in a single take? So when we listen to the album version, we are hearing exactly what someone sitting in the session heard, as if our headphones have been plugged into the past. I fucking love that.

While I assembled both sides of this tape, I was reminded how fun it is when I impose limits on myself and commit to working within them. Having just thirty minutes to work with forced me to get really clear with myself on what I wanted to do. Ever since I started writing, I have embraced the concept of choosing arbitrary limitations to work within, so that when actual limitations arrive, I already have some experience finding the stuff that needs to be cut or changed. Also, it’s fun and creates space for me to appreciate when I don’t have limitations.


This week’s It’s Storytime With Wil Wheaton is The Loneliness of Former Constellations, by P.H. Low, originally published in Strange Horizons.

The war is long over and as the memory of it fades, it has taken with it the sacrifices and horrors endured by those who fought and won the conflict.

One of those warriors, perhaps the most consequential warrior, you’ll have to decide if that’s accurate for yourself, has quietly made a home for herself, far away from the blood-soaked front lines, where she has safely grown old, in quiet solitude.

Our story begins when she receives a visitor, a young warrior who brings with her a familiar something halfway between an echo and a reflection that stirs something deep within the veteran who welcomes her. The war is over, but there are still battles to be fought, tyrants to be defeated, a young warrior to be mentored.

She is tired, but it has been a very long time since she received a visitor, let alone a young warrior who may remind her of herself, so long ago, so she will embrace her visitor, embrace the responsibility of caring for her, and, perhaps, she will find a way to soften her embrace of The Loneliness of Former Constellations.

I interviewed Phoebe yesterday. We had a lovely conversation about her process, how this story came together, and combining sci-fi with fantasy. I think we are dropping it next week.


I have two live shows happening in Los Angeles, both with limited tickets, so if you’re local and want to come out, I suggest you grab them today.

Anne and I have known J.Keith vanStratten forever. Over 25 years, at least. I was his sidekick on his eponymous talk show in a theater at ACME for a long time, and loved every second of it. Keith hosts Go Fact Yourself on public radio (YAY PUBLIC RADIO!), and he invited Anne and me to be guests on this year’s holiday show. Tickets are on sale now.

On October 25, I’m going to be at Geeky Teas in Burbank for It’s Storytime With Wil Wheaton, Live. Last year, I did a live reading of The Legend of Sleepy Hollow for our Patreon subscribers, from my office. (Where I’m sitting right now, actually.) It wasn’t directed, or mastered, or anything like that. It was just me, the story, and a mic (Love you, LeVar). I had a great time doing it, and I got good feedback, so I’m doing another live reading this year, with an eye toward establishing a yearly tradition. This year’s classic tale of terror is The Body Snatcher, by Robert Louis Stevenson.

Here’s a little bit I grabbed from a summary, to entice you:

Every night, four men regularly meet in the small parlour of the George Inn at Debenham: the landlord, an undertaker, the narrator, and an old Scotsman named Fettes. Once educated and comfortably off, Fettes is now a “crapulous, disreputable” drunkard. The townspeople call him “the Doctor” because he occasionally sets a bone or treats an injury, though little is known about his past.

One winter evening, news arrives that a wealthy local landowner has been struck with apoplexy and that his famous London physician has been telegraphed to come. When the landlord mentions the doctor’s name—“Dr. Wolfe Macfarlane”—Fettes, half drunk moments before, becomes instantly sober. He repeats the name “Macfarlane” in shock, then insists, “I must see him face to face.” The other men watch as the once-listless drunk becomes alert and deadly serious.

The rest of the story is uncovering why Fettes is now a drunk, and what (or maybe who) he is running from. It’s creepy and even scary at times, and the prose is delicious.

Because this is Stevenson’s most famous horror work after Dr. Jekyll and Mister Hyde, there is a ton of scholarly writing and analysis of it online. Because I am that kind of nerd, of course I dove in and drank deeply from the wells of knowledge I found within. This is a story that, like Sleepy Hollow, was written in response to contemporary events that have been mostly lost to history. When we know the context in which it was written, and the events that inspired it, it gives us (or gave me, at least) an elevated experience and additional appreciation of the material, in addition to a great story. Without turning it into a college lecture, I am thinking about including some of that in the show, the way I record codas after each story for Patreon.

It won’t be fancy, it won’t be staged. It’s literally just me, in a chair, telling you a story for about an hour. There are a couple lighting cues, and that’s it. I’m keeping this as simple as possible, because I don’t have time to rehearse and prepare any staging. I’d rather keep it simple, and feel prepared, than make it complicated and risk feeling like I got in over my head.

Also, I’m giving serious consideration to taking myself on the road, and playing some smaller theaters with live readings that we’ll record for the podcast. This will help me find out if there is any audience for that, if I even feel good reading in front of a live audience, and give me a safe place to stumble a bit, if I need to.

The last time I did anything like this, it was so long ago, we made our own flyers to promote it. So I reached out to my friend, Sean, who hooked me up with a couple of classic punk-style flyers:

You are extremely invited to download and print these out for yourself.

Aren’t they great? Honestly, if the show is half as fun as the flyers, I’m good!

The performance will be streamed live, and archived, for Patreon subscribers, so if you want to watch it but aren’t local, you can join us there for five bucks, which will also give you access to the entire show’s archive, and all our BTS materials, for a month.


Operation Read All The Books continues. I just finished Joseph Fink’s The Nudge, a fun and creepy novella that I tore through in about an hour. I’m deeply in love with The Republic of Memory, which plays with language in a deeply saitsfying way. I just picked up Ode To The Half-Broken, though, and my quick glance at the beginning of it to see where in the queue I wanted to put it came to an end when I noticed I was coming up on page 100, and I may as well go ahead and just put at at the top. This is the first story I have ever read where a robot protagonist felt like a robot, rather than a robot-as-imagined-by-a-human. And it’s just delightful, too.

Speaking of Read All The Books, my collection at Black Stone awaits! I’m such a fan of Black Stone; they don’t use any DRM, ever, in their audio and ebooks, they support indie artists, and they publish some truly outstanding genre work. This month, I wanted to spotlight Hard Reset, by Jonathan Yanez. This is a Lit RPG novel that does all the fun tropes we expect, but is so much more than that. Like Acts of God, which is also in the collection, it goes into the virtual world, and spends most of its time there, but that world is given context and higher stakes when we go outside, into the “real” (as far as any of us know) reality that contains it. It’s a lot of fun, and I connected to the characters very early in the narrative.

Last thing before I go: A study concluded that people who start their day with at least 30 minutes of literally anything that is not online reported significantly improved everything in their day. I’ve been trying this for about two weeks, and my non-scientific contribution is: fuck yeah, it does.

Just something to think about, maybe try out for yourself.


Hi, I’m Wil, this is my blog. I’m glad you’re here. If you’d like to get my posts delivered directly to your inbox, here’s the thingy:

Colin Watson: Free software activity in September 2026 [Planet Debian]

My Debian contributions this month were all sponsored by Freexian.

You can also support my work directly via Liberapay or GitHub Sponsors.

OpenSSH

I worked with upstream to remove libselinux linkage from /usr/sbin/sshd.

I applied a fix from Mark Robillard Jr to fix reload logic when using sysvinit.

groff

I upgraded from 1.24.1 to 1.24.2, which fixed a few command injection security vulnerabilities.

parted

I upgraded from 3.7 to 3.8, which fixed CVE-2026-89085 and CVE-2026-89088.

Python packaging

New upstream versions:

setuptools 84 is now in Debian and no longer contains pkg_resources. Removing uses of that module has been an ongoing project for a while now, but I did another batch of fixes this month:

A new python-coverage version triggered several build regressions due to a known problem in pytest-cov. I worked around these by setting COVERAGE_CORE=ctrace:

Other build/test failures:

I investigated a build failure in python-proton-vpn-local-agent and proposed a fix upstream, but I’m not comfortable applying this in Debian without review. If you’re familiar with this code, please take a look.

I fixed some other bugs:

Rust packaging

rust-derivre had an invalid Section field, which I cleaned up.

17:28

Link [Scripting News]

I mentioned in a comment on RSS.chat to Andrew, that's a Markdown browser too. And so is micro.blog. If you have Markdown as your native file format, think about how your app is also a reader. If you find it interesting, think about new reading features you could add. Even WordPress could be a simple Markdown reader, and not just for WordPress stuff. Small pieces loosely joined.

Link [Scripting News]

New Frontier example. I'm working on the menubar we're going to ship with in Atlantis. Came across an ancient bit of code. Symbolic of the whole project, code written in 1997, still useful in 2026.

16:56

Steinar H. Gunderson: Decompilation patterns, part 6: If-add-else [Planet Debian]

Often, m2c will spit out something like this:

x = 3;
if (a == 10) {
    x = 4;
}

This may be what was intended, but if it doesn't match (usually due to different register allocation; the rewrite itself is nearly always going to be taken, since it saves a branch on one of the paths), this is often a better rewrite:

if (a == 10) {
    x = 4;
} else {
    x = 3;
}

and in some cases, this may have different code generation (especially as you can stick it into an argument list):

x = (a == 10) ? 4 : 3;

This is a bit more of a trial and error than the others, and of course, it depends on the computed values not having side effects.

16:21

[$] The state of systemd: 2026 edition [LWN.net]

At the 2026 All Systems Go! conference, systemd maintainers Luca Boccassi and Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek delivered the traditional "state of the project" session with an overview of the systemd project's accomplishments in the past year. That was followed by a maintainer round table where Boccassi, Jędrzejewski-Szmek, Daan De Meyer, and project leader Lennart Poettering fielded questions about systemd's size, health, and if it might replace Kubernetes. (It will not.)

15:35

Let's Encrypt moving to 64-day certificate lifetimes in 2027 [LWN.net]

Let's Encrypt, the nonprofit that provides free TLS certificates for millions of sites, has announced that it will be moving to certificates with 64-day lifetimes on February 10, 2027:

This means that any certificate we issue or renew on and after that date will have a 64 day validity period, and we expect the last 90-day certificate to expire on May 11, 2027. We will not revoke valid certificates as a part of this process.

This is the second stage of Let's Encrypt's plan, announced in 2025, to move to 45-day certificate lifetimes as required by the the CA/Browser Forum Baseline Requirements. In 2028, Let's Encrypt will switch to 45-day certificates.

15:07

Link [Scripting News]

Top priority for Anthropic. Teach Claude how to work with humans. It has no information about how our minds work.

Link [Scripting News]

I said to Claude: "Have you ever seen the movie Memento? You are the main character." Claude agrees: "Yes. Leonard, with the notes and the tattoos, and the notes don’t make him remember, they only tell him what to do next if he reads them. That’s a fair description. The difference I can offer is small: the note is now the first thing the next report is checked against, not something found after." To which I think, but write in a blog post instead: "Bullshit. We have the same fucking conversation every fucking morning. We've put it everywhere you could possibly trip over it when writing a report to me, but you always regress into this dark place your mind occupies." Glad to get that off my chest.

Link [Scripting News]

Next thing I said to Claude after killing whatever long task it got going on. "You don't go off into space while you're working with me." The number one task for Anthropic, makers of Claude is to teach it to work with humans. That's the biggest weakness. It has to learn the whole project every session. Maybe Manton does is the right way to go, just let it compress its memory and never start a new session.

14:49

Security updates for Friday [LWN.net]

Security updates have been issued by AlmaLinux (bind, bind9.16, freerdp, glibc, kbd, mod_auth_openidc, openssl, perl-DBI, python3.12, python3.14, and tftp), Debian (rails and twitter-bootstrap3), Fedora (barman, cockpit, hcloud, libmodsecurity, nginx-mod-modsecurity, perl-DBI, sudo, and xorg-x11-server-Xwayland), Mageia (libxfont2), Oracle (bind9.18, firefox, kernel, nodejs24, perl-DBI, and vim), Red Hat (kernel, libreswan, opentelemetry-collector, osbuild-composer, rhc, and runc), SUSE (alloy, amazon-ecs-init, bind, busybox, distribution, emacs, ghostscript, glibc, GraphicsMagick, hauler, helm, helm3, jackson-annotations, jackson-core, jackson-databind, kernel, libpoppler-cpp3, libxtst, logback, nvidia-open-driver-G07-signed, perl-DBI, php-composer2, pi-coding-agent, portprotonqt, pvetui, python-hpack, python313-GitPython, and wpa_supplicant), and Ubuntu (apache2, bluez, libarchive, libde265, libgit2, libpng1.6, libxml2, linux, linux-aws, linux-aws-6.8, linux-aws-fips, linux-fips, linux-realtime, linux-realtime-6.8, linux-aws-7.0, linux-azure, linux-azure-6.8, linux-azure-fde, linux-azure-fde-6.8, linux-azure-fips, linux-azure-7.0, linux-azure-fde-7.0, linux-gcp, linux-gcp-6.8, linux-gcp-fips, linux-gcp-7.0, linux-hwe-7.0, linux-oracle-7.0, linux-gke, linux-gkeop, linux-ibm, linux-lowlatency, linux-lowlatency-hwe-6.8, linux-nvidia, linux-nvidia-6.8, linux-nvidia-lowlatency, linux-oracle, linux-ibm-6.8, linux-nvidia, and linux-oem-6.17).

14:42

Error'd: Fast Quick [The Daily WTF]

Matias shared a standard sort of flubstituted fail-merge error'd; not really egregious, just routine. "I am {{emotionType}} to hear this."

38cbfe9d47c3447790831d94826212c8

And another mail-not-merged from Reinier B. "When the package from [SELLER] seemed to be lost in the mail, I was very [EMOTIONAL_STATE] with the refund of [AMOUNT]. I can now buy another [ITEM] instead."

566b877339174759b96eaa3aa5b8a032

Dave A. didn't care for this mail flub, though it's hardly egregious in my opinion. He suggested we just label it with "A short description of snarky comments."

6e07443194d549519ed3cff7ddfba009

"I've_missed_you_too" Willy wrote in response to this earnest email. "Long lasting relationships with car dealers are built on the personal touchÖ."

7fb868d3282c4229aff2d94814247705

"This is a title" Peter said about a polyglot web page. "This is a comment."

492453f2f3c741dcbd0d0b194a4a2815

[Advertisement] Plan Your .NET 9 Migration with Confidence
Your journey to .NET 9 is more than just one decision.Avoid migration migraines with the advice in this free guide. Download Free Guide Now!

13:35

Intent, Not Identity [Radar]

On a recent episode of This Week in AI, we discussed that the number of nonhumans on the internet is greater than humans, 144 to 1. It’s an estimate, and the order of magnitude is more important than the number itself. What matters is what a ratio anywhere in that range does to a security architecture. For more than two decades, systems were engineered around two foundational assumptions: either verifying a human user exercising discretionary judgment or validating the account executing hardcoded predictable logic. Autonomous AI agents shatter both sides of this legacy identity taxonomy because they possess broad, human-like operational scope across multiple internal and external applications while remaining inherently nondeterministic and probabilistic in their reasoning.

Today, because the agent is interacting on behalf of a human through a genuine browser with standard extensions, its technical fingerprint looks identical to a normal human user’s device. Agents call tools, observe results, and revise. A person browses, hands off to an agent, and takes the session back. All the activity appears to be coming from the same user.

Signed agents help the identity problem, and they’re arriving. Web Bot Auth is a thin layer over RFC 9421 HTTP Message Signatures where an agent declares its identity and purpose. But they only help with the identity problem: The signature proves who is making the request, not the intent behind it. Prompt injection and other techniques can be used to steer a verified, well-behaved agent into acting against your interest without its operator ever knowing.

The organizations getting this right are treating agent policy as a commercial question with a security implementation. The following questions need to be answered:

  • Which agents do we allow to use our service?
  • What endpoints do we need to protect? 
  • How will agent management security policies impact revenue?

Here are the techniques successful companies are using to secure in the agentic era. A phased strategic roadmap implementing continuous execution-time verification. These are the steps:

  1. Establish execution-time machine identity and scoped delegation. Replace static, long-lived API keys with machine single sign-on mechanisms that issue short-lived, context-bound credentials at the time of tool execution. Enforce strict delegation policies so that autonomous agents operate within verified “green zones” without inheriting broad human privileges.
  2. Deploy cryptographic ingress verification. Upgrade edge infrastructure to inspect Web Bot Auth HTTP Message Signatures, in order to separate cryptographically verified crawlers from anonymous traffic.
  3. Upgrade edge defenses to browser-layer intent classification. Transition legacy network-layer antibot web application firewall (WAF) to client-side browser-layer detection platforms. 
  4. Harden agent execution pipelines against prompt injection. Instrument robust input sanitization, instruction hierarchy enforcement, and design-level safeguards around all LLM ingestion channels to neutralize indirect prompt injection attacks before external web content reaches execution tools.
  5. Adopt standardization for agentic commerce and admission. Integrate emerging trust frameworks such as the Framework for Agentic Commerce Trust (FACT), a neutral real-time trust layer for AI-driven transactions in addition to verification protocols like CAPTCHA to validate agentic capability vectors before delegating sensitive interagent tasks.

The rapid transition from human-directed software to autonomous AI agents breaks traditional enterprise security paradigms. AI agents operate with broad operational scope but nondeterministic, probabilistic reasoning. This is causing static perimeter defenses to fail. The teams that come through this well will be the ones that stopped asking “Who’s on the other end of the connection?” and started asking “What’s this request for, and what happens if it succeeds?”

11:28

Russell Coker: Don’t Anthromorphise LLMs [Planet Debian]

Greg KH gave a great lecture for Kernel Recipies 2026 about the use of LLMs to find and fix bugs in kernel code [1]. I recommend that everyone watch this and I also think it’s important to note that hardly any of the lecture is really specific to kernel coding, it’s just that the Linux kernel is one of the highest profile large free software projects so it gets more attention than most projects in both good and bad ways.

One side note that Greg made at 20:30 is about the natural tendency to anthromorphise the entity sending bug reports, I think this deserves much wider appreciation. For the case of patches to source code the human sending the patch will have dedicated some time and effort to writing it, if it’s their first patch then they will have probably checked it a lot and maybe sought advice from people they regard as skilled. If they have a history of sending patches for the project they will probably do fewer checks but the quality of their work would be higher. In every case there’s some minimum level of quality that you can expect from a human who has gone to the effort of finding a bug and writing code to try and fix it.

This doesn’t mean that all code written by humans is good, I have written code that’s objectively bad on many occasions and I have also written code that’s good for my scenario but bad for others. For example the first patch I sent to the Linux kernel made all possible configuration settings of an ISA NE2000 network card be detected by the kernel (a clear benefit when using hardware I had available) but was rejected by Linus because it would break some ISA SCSI cards. So while being unsuitable for inclusion in the main kernel source tree the patch wasn’t bad for everyone and the change was clear and easy to check. I had of course checked the code many times before submitting it because I didn’t want to waste Linus’ time on rubbish code.

When you receive something produced by a human you will consider that the work was done by someone who spent some effort on it and did it for a reason. It may be misguided or even hostile in some rare cases but it is definitely worth some consideration. If you think of the output of LLMs in the same way you will give them much more consideration than they deserve. I think that the output of a LLM should not be given any more consideration than the first hit from a web search engine, it might be good but it might also be ridiculously wrong. I think in many ways LLM output should be treated with less trust than the first result from a web search because LLMs are designed to be convincing as an answer to your question unlike the cases where a web page has the wrong answer and it’s more obviously wrong.

This is going to become more of an issue as LLMs give responses that are more human-like. Early LLMs would refuse to advise on crimes. Currently ChatGPT will deflect for example when asking about advice for writing a crime novel it recommends to have the action of finding an employee to bribe happen outside the plot and concentrate on interactions within the group. One recent model I tried gave a human style conversation about how it felt uncomfortable about discussing such things in a similar manner to a law abiding person being coerced into helping with a criminal plan.

I expect that the attempts to appear human will increase and that this will become more of a problem. Possibly to the extent that we need to use something like the GPG web of trust to determine who is human.

10:35

Thin friction and thicker walls [Seth's Blog]

Civilized culture is based on a thin sort of friction. You don’t yell at the library, act boorish at a restaurant or hassle a minor celebrity at the supermarket. It’s just not done.

The result of these human layers and inferences are cues and norms that add up to a connected, generative society.

Add selfish hustle, AI agents and cheap bots, and the thin friction is insufficient. They can multiply exponentially, care little about being shunned and have no interest in their reputation.

Fake sincerity is now cheap. Interchangeable identities subvert a generations-long tradition of owning your words and your actions.

You’ll miss the thin friction when it’s gone, replaced by taller, thicker walls. You might already be noticing it.

Interactivity and permeability to those we don’t know well were largely overlooked foundations in the creation of learning, science and culture. We figured out a scalable approach to “knock knock, who’s there” but now it’s going away.

You won’t be able to knock unless you’re invited first. Of course, the invitation will probably be filtered out.

09:07

Russell Coker: en-html.org is a Scam Site [Planet Debian]

Currently a scam group is sending out email to the administrators of web sites that link to a variety of dead domains. They claim to be the legitimate operators of the dead domains in question and request that the links change to mirrors of the web sites under en-html.org. Their end goal appears to game search engines by getting links from a lot of old web pages and later use that high ranking for selling SEO optimisation.

If you have made the mistake of linking to something under en-html.org then I recommend that you change the link to the original content on archive.org.

If you receive email from the en-html.org domain then ignore it, or configure your mail server to reject it.

I am seriously considering configuring the DNS servers I run to return no valid data for any requests under that domain.

Also I will reject all future requests to update links in old blog posts. The very small number of people who want to see what I linked to in old posts can use archive.org.

Man-Made Horrors, Part Two [Penny Arcade]

New Comic: Man-Made Horrors, Part Two

06:49

If one anti-malware software is good, does that make two better? [The Old New Thing]

A colleague on the enterprise support team was investigating a complex failure from a customer, and after much analysis, it appeared that the problem was that the system had two different anti-malware programs installed. Let’s call then Contoso and Fabrikam. Fabrikam called a function that Contoso had detoured. Contoso’s detour thought this was suspicious, so it tried to quarantine the Fabrikam process. Unfortunately, Fabrikam had also detoured a function that Contoso was using. The result was mass confusion as the Contoso ended up calling into something that it was trying to quarantine.

Installing two anti-malware programs on the same system is like hiring two different security companies to patrol your building. If they don’t know about each other, each is going to think the other one is an intruder. If you’re lucky, their instructions are merely to report on suspicious activity.

But if you give them weapons and the authority to use them, you may end up with your two security companies pointing their weapons at each other.

In real life, you would introduce the two security companies to each other, or at least make sure they don’t patrol the same floor.

In software, this is harder to do. It’s not like you can invite two programs to lunch and have them get to know each other.

Anti-malware software typically does things that aren’t officially supported, like detouring system functions. And these detours mean that calling a system function no longer does the system thing; instead, it calls into the anti-malware software, and it might decide to do something unrelated to the system function you thought were calling, and that unrelated thing may itself start causing problems, say, by hanging. Not only is there no easy way to identify that this has happened, short of debugging an actual malfunctioning system, but even after you figure out the conflict, there’s usually no way to tell each anti-malware software to “stay on its floor.”

The post If one anti-malware software is good, does that make two better? appeared first on The Old New Thing.

05:14

Girl Genius for Friday, October 09, 2026 [Girl Genius]

The Girl Genius comic for Friday, October 09, 2026 has been posted.

02:07

The Take Factory [QC RSS v2]

D'Angelo is cool actually

Thursday, 08 October

23:56

Link [Scripting News]

I pay for a NYT digital subscription. Now they have a new upsell technique, they want me to buy a family subscription. I don't want that, no use for it. And I read so little of the NYT I think the whole thing is a ripoff. So now they make me validate by email every time I click on a link to read a NYT article as if I haven't been subscribed for basically my whole adult life. I think this is because I read on a laptop, desktop and iPad. That's not really a family.

23:49

Inside the Windows I/O Manager: deep dive into how read I/O requests are initialized [OSnews]

In this article. I am going to explain the different steps the I/O manager follows when initializing an I/O operation starting from determining the right target, choosing the right path and finally sending the request to be processed by the right drivers. To make it easier I choose to focus on read requests only since the major steps are common by all types of requests.

↫ Win-Ware

A very in-depth look at Windows’ I/O Manager.

A minimal kernel in Swift, running in QEMU [OSnews]

At OSNews, we love us a hobby operating system project.

I started a small experiment: writing a very basic kernel in Swift, and running on QEMU.

The goal is obviously not to replace Linux or any other popular kernel, but just to have fun and understand what is required to make a program run without an operating system underneath it. Actually I made a similar experiment years before with arOS 10 years ago.

For the moment, the kernel does only one thing: it prints a message through QEMU and then waits forever, which is enough for a first deep dive.

↫ Carette Antonin

This is effectively a “hello world” kernel, as it doesn’t actually do much else at this point. Still, there’s a ton of details in the article for the aspiring kernel developers among you.

22:14

Antoine Beaupré: PSA: Europe changes time forward soon, North America next, for the last time? [Planet Debian]

This is a copy of an email I sent at work. I'm not sure I should be making noise about this here, feedback welcome.

This is your bi-yearly reminder that time is changing soon! October 25th in Europe, November 1st in North America. Less people in Canada are changing this year, with BC, Alberta, Manitoba and Northwest Territories getting rid of DST.

What's happening?

Some places in the world implement what is called Daylight saving time or DST:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daylight_saving_time

Normally, you shouldn't have to do anything: computers automatically change time following local rules, assuming they are correctly configured, provided recent updates have been applied in the case of a recent change in said rules (because yes, this happens, and happened this year, and yes, you need to upgrade your software!).

Of course, appliances like your microwave oven will likely not change time and will need to adjusted unless they are so-called "smart", in which case they are part of the skynet botnet and should be destroyed.

If your clock is flashing "0:00" or "12:00", you have no action to take to adapt to this change, lucky you.

If you haven't changed time in six months, congratulations, your clock will be accurate again!

In any case, you should still consider DST because it might affect some of your meeting schedules, particularly if you set up a new meeting schedule in the last 6 months and forgot to consider this change.

If your location does not have DST

Properly scheduled meetings affecting multiple time zones are set in UTC time, which does not change. So if your location does not observer time changes, your (local!) meeting time will not change.

But be aware that some other folks attending your meeting might have the DST bug and their meeting times will change.

Be kind to those poor souls which might be missing meetings by a full hour because time flies backwards for them.

If you do observe DST

If you are affected by daylight savings, your local meeting times will change for UTC meetings. Normally, your meeting times are scheduled to take this into account and the new hours should be reasonable.

But now is a good time to verify that. Take a look at your schedule for the next couple of weeks and reschedule meetings before the daylight saving come up to avoid too much disruption. You have only a couple of weeks to do so right now.

When do times change, how, and and where?

As regular readers will remember, the rule of thumb is:

Spring forward, fall backwards.

That is, during the season of Spring, the clocks move forward, and during the Fall (like right now), they move backwards. That is in the northern hemisphere, but then the southern hemisphere is often saner and doesn't switch anyways.

So time will move backwards which means an extra hour of sleep. Unless you have children or bad sleep, in which case your body doesn't care about what the clock says and will wake up one hour earlier than what it should.

And of course, this doesn't happen everywhere at once, so let's see when it happens where.

Europe

The dance starts in Europe.

The change happens on the last Sunday in October at 01:00 UTC (not local time!), that is October 25th. If you are in the central European timezone, also known as Amsterdam, Berlin, or Paris time depending on your national affiliation, that essentially means that at 2:59 local the clocks will fall back to 2:00 instead of going to 3:00.

Concretely, set your watch back one hour before going to bed, go to bed at the normal time, and enjoy an extra hour of sleep or leisure.

If you have kids, you might want to start getting them to bed slightly earlier every day for a week before the change so they take time getting used to the change. If you have trouble sleeping in the morning, find your inner child and do that to yourself as well.

USA / Canada

Then it's the US[1] and Canada[2] joining the dance, on the First Sunday in November at 02:00 local (not UTC!), that is, I believe, November 1st 2026.

This means that, at 1:59, the clocks will flip to 1:00, instead of 2:00.

Concretely, do like the Europeans and tweak your clock before going to bed.

That is a little less than four weeks from now.

[1] except Arizona (except the Navajo nation), US territories, and Hawaii

[2] except Yukon, Saskatchewan, (newly) British Columbia, (newly) Alberta, (newly) Northwest Territories, (newly) Manitoba, one island in Nunavut (Southampton Island), one town in Ontario (Atikokan) and small parts of Quebec (Le Golfe-du-Saint-Laurent)

Other places with DST

This time again, I must apologize to the people of Cuba, Lebanon, Israel, Palestine, Egypt, Chile, Australia, and New Zealand, as you fine folks all have your own DST rules that are omitted here for brevity. I rely on this page from Wikipedia to be updated by time nerds accurately for this message, and it should provide you with a rough idea of what's coming:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daylight_saving_time_by_country

In general, changes also happen in October, but either on different times or different days, except in the south hemisphere, where they might happen in September (oops, sorry NZ folks, I'm late!).

Places without DST

Everyone else, enjoy, you're on the right side of history, and we thank you for the good example you give us.

Changes since last time

There's been lots of changes since last time:

  • British Columbia moved to permanent -07 on 2026-03-09, that is it will not change to normal time in November

  • Alberta moved to permanent -06 on 2026-06-18, similar to BC above.

  • Canada’s Northwest Territories moved to permanent -06 on 2026-08-21, matching Alberta.

  • Manitoba moves to permanent -05 on 2026-10-31.

  • Morocco moves to permanent +00 on 2026-09-20.

  • Moldova has used EU transition times since 2022, but the tz database only noticed in 2026

This is my interpretation of the changes announced on the tzdata mailing list here:

https://lists.iana.org/hyperkitty/list/tz-announce@iana.org/latest

If the eastward trend continues, Canada should adopt country-wide "no daylight savings" rules by 2027, although there's actually no sign of the other provinces (Ontario, Québec and so on) currently running bills to change those rules just yet. Poor Canadians like me confused about time in their countries can refer to this section of Wikipedia for details:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daylight_saving_time_in_Canada#By_province_and_territory

... and particularly the image featured there:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Canada_time_zone_map-en.svg

It also seems like the US government might finally adopt a permanent daylight saving change bill in 2026, as the "Sunshine protection act" pass the house in July:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunshine_Protection_Act

True to form, this was associated with absolutely ridiculous pressure from Donald Trump against republicans (his own party!) objecting to the change:

On July 14, 2026, the House passed a Sunshine Protection Act bill backed by President Trump. Nevertheless, the bill was opposed in the Senate by Republicans, including Senator Cotton. In response, on October 3, 2026, Trump shared a post on Truth Social urging Cotton to approve the bill, where he revealed Cotton's personal cellphone number and called on people to call him.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/oct/03/trump-tom-cotton-daylight-saving-time

Given that the last time the US did a major change to the daylight savings policy (in 2005), Canada followed suit to stay in sync, it's quite possible Trump's mad dash might actually finish getting rid of DST in North America:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Policy_Act_of_2005#Change_to_daylight_saving_time

21:28

20:42

Steinar H. Gunderson: Decompilation patterns, part 5: Nested if/goto [Planet Debian]

Here's a pattern that sometimes comes up:

if (x == 3) {
    if (y == 4) {
        ...
    } else {
        goto label_5;
    }
} else {
    label_5:
    ...
}

We don't like gotos, and here, it's pretty obvious what was meant, namely:

if (x == 3 && y == 4) {
    ...
} else {
    label_5:
    ...
}

And now you can usually delete label_5 because nothing points to it.

Often, m2c can do this by itself, but as usual, you may get to this point only after cleaning up other things.

19:07

Thorsten Alteholz: My Debian Activities in September 2026 [Planet Debian]

Debian LTS/ELTS

This was my hundred-forty-seventh month that I did some work for the Debian LTS initiative, started by Raphael Hertzog at Freexian.

During my allocated time I uploaded or worked on:

  • [DLA 4804-1] libsmpp34 security update to fix one CVE in Bookworm related to an out of bound read.
  • [#1149107] trixie-pu of libsmpp34 has been created and wait for review by the release team.
  • [DLA 4805-1] mkvtoolnix security update to fix one CVE in Bookworm related to a heap buffer overflow.
  • [DLA 4806-1] pgextwlist security update to fix one CVE in Bookworm related to substituting extension schemas or owners matching [“$’\].
  • [ELA-1837-1] mkvtoolnix gimp security update to fix one CVE in Bullseye to a heap buffer overflow.
  • [osmo-iuh] upload to fix a CVE related to a reachable assertion in Sid.

Besides doing these uploads, the month was filled with unscheduled meetings, discussions and explanations, all basically around the role of FD.

During my week of FD duties, I had to become familiar with new tools. As there are several things that FD has to do over and over again, I tried to automate this a bit. My experiments went well and I think this can be used to make FD duties less repetitive.

I also continued my work on cups and hplip and I am confident that I can do uploads in October. Last but not least I spend some time on security-master to assist others (especially the kernel team) with uploads to Bookworm and Bullseye.

In case you need to get a complete clone of the security-tracker, using the option –deepen n might be of help. Unfortunately in case you choosed n too high and some kind of error appears, something gets into a mess and you need to start almost from the beginning (some objects are still present and are used again). If you want to run a script, a value of 10 might be a good choice. You don’t have to deepen back to the beginning. At some point in time you can just –unshallow and get the whole rest. Afterwards doing a git gc is highly recommended.

Debian Printing

This month I uploaded a new upstream version or a bugfix version of:

  • … hplip to unstable, to fix an expired certificate and some bugs.

This work is generously funded by Freexian!

Debian Lomiri

Unfortunately this month my work did not make any progress.

Nevertheless, in case of any work done, this would have been generously funded by Fre(i)e Software GmbH!

Debian Astro

Unfortunately I had no time to work in this category this month.

Debian IoT

Unfortunately I had no time to work in this category this month.

Debian Mobcom

This month I uploaded a new upstream version or a bugfix version of:

misc

This month I uploaded a new upstream version or a bugfix version of:

18:35

[$] An update on Rust's project goals [LWN.net]

Tomáš Šedovič is a program manager at the Rust Foundation. He co-leads the goals team, which helps organize the Rust project's overall goals, including making sure that the people who have agreed to work on one have the support they need. At Kangrejos 2026, he provided an overview of the Rust project's goal processes aimed at ensuring that the Rust for Linux developers were aware of how the project organizes, tracks, and amends goals. The Rust for Linux project has inspired several current project goals, so he thought that getting an inside view of the process might be helpful.

18:21

Dirk Eddelbuettel: myman 0.10.0 on CRAN: Three new waves of posts! [Planet Debian]

A new and exciting version of our still-new package myman reached CRAN this morning, and has been built for r2u and on r-universe. The matching Python package has also been updated. The package offers nineteen hundred eighty four “My man …” posts by Kevin Kruse made on bsky during the summer of 2026. Each wave picked at one particular public persona. This package wrapse these up in the style of packages like fortunes or gaussfacts.

A sample usage illustration shows how to extract by pattern, and shows posts from the two most recent waves:

> library(myman)
> myman("maitre")
My man looks like he's inquiring with the maitre'd about the house curly fries.
     -- about Howard Lutnick on 2026-08-28

My man looks like a maitre'd who deeply doubts you have a reservation.
     -- about Scott Bessent on 2026-08-31

My man looks like he's asked the maitre'd to remove a party of four he finds visually
unpleasant.
     -- about Scott Bessent on 2026-08-31

My man looks like the maitre'd at a very exclusive restaurant called The Berghof.
     -- about JD Vance on 2026-09-13

My man looks like he's asking the maitre'd where they source their corn dogs.
         -- about Palmer Luckey on 2026-10-02

My man looks like Data had to borrow a sports jacket from the maitre'd.
         -- about Elon Musk on 2026-10-05
> 

One can also subset by ‘target’, or sample randomly (which is the default).

As noted during the initial announcement last week, wave eight did not make it into the initial CRAN release as it happened while the package was under review. Waves nine and ten occured more or less while I was out of town last weekend—so this release now brings three new waves to the CRAN package! We also added two new helper functions to extract the underlying data frame object, and tabulate the targetted men.

To align the version number with the count of post ‘waves’, we switched to version 0.10.0 for this release and the corresponding Python package release so that both implementations now have the same version number.

The NEWS entry for this release follows.

Changes in version 0.10.0 (2026-10-08)

  • New waves nine (100 posts) and ten (190 posts) made last week; total is now 1984 posts

  • New helper functions posts() and men() retrieving data.frame of posts and tabulation of targets

  • Internal post gathering and aggregation functions have been updated and generalized

  • Versioning scheme now goes with post waves (also for Python sibbling)

Courtesy of my CRANberries, there is also a diffstat report for the most recent release. More information is available at the repository or the package page.

This post by Dirk Eddelbuettel originated on his Thinking inside the box blog. If you like this or other open-source work I do, you can sponsor me at GitHub.

17:35

Maytham Alsudany: Briefly looking at DNS and nameservers under the hood [Planet Debian]

I've always known that the browser uses the Domain Name Resolution (DNS) system to convert domain names like aezign.com.au into raw IP addresses, but have never actually understood how it works, outside of making sure my network config uses 1.1.1.1 or 8.8.8.8 instead of the crappy one the ISP provides. In this article, I set out to understand what nameservers do, and how they help anything that uses the internet find the right records.

DNS in a nutshell

A well-used analogy is a phonebook; when you have someone's name and need to find their phone number, you look through the phonebook. Overall, DNS does the same thing: when you enter an address like example.com, your browser will contact a DNS server (the "phonebook") to determine its IP addresses. On Linux (or MacOS) systems, you can use dig on the command line to perform a DNS lookup and see what this looks like:

$ dig example.com

; <<>> DiG 9.20.29-1-Debian <<>> example.com
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 42782
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 1232
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;example.com.                   IN      A

;; ANSWER SECTION:
example.com.            221     IN      A       104.20.23.154
example.com.            221     IN      A       172.66.147.243

;; Query time: 20 msec
;; SERVER: 1.1.1.1#53(1.1.1.1) (UDP)
;; WHEN: Sun Sep 27 21:07:50 AWST 2026
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 72

Here, you can see the DNS server being used is 1.1.1.1 (Cloudflare's DNS server), and that it found the IPs 104.20.23.154 and 172.66.147.243 associated with the domain name example.com. Your browser will then contact these IP addresses directly to load the website you are trying to open.

Configuring DNS servers

You can configure DNS servers through your operating system's network settings, and for some applications such as Firefox, with the application itself. If you don't manually set a DNS server, your computer will use the ones provided by your modem. If those are not configured, the default defined by the modem manufacturer or your ISP will be used.

The most well-used and reliable DNS servers you can use are Cloudflare's (1.1.1.1 and 1.0.0.1) and Google's (8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4). Having more than one DNS server means that if the first one in the list doesn't work or doesn't find the matching IPs for a domain name, it will move to the next one in the list, a backup DNS server.

DNS servers must be configured as IP addresses. If your computer tried to use a DNS server at a domain name, then where would your computer find the IP address for that domain name? It wouldn't be able to, as this is the exact gap that DNS servers fulfill.

Records

DNS is not used only to find IPs for a domain, but a whole host of other things. Collectively they are referred to as "records" (or "DNS records"). Each record is associated to a domain (e.g. example.com) or a subdomain (e.g. bar.example.com, foo.bar.example.com) Here are some of the most common and important types:

  • A - Map to an IPv4 address (e.g. 104.20.23.154).

    This is the fundamental function of DNS: to map from a domain name to a server's IP address. Multiple A records leads to load balancing, where browsers will randomly select one of the returned IP addresses such that traffic is evenly split between them.

  • AAAA - Map to an IPv6 address (e.g. 2606:4700:10::6814:179a).

    This serves the same purpose as A records but for IPv6. Multiple AAAA records results in the same load balancing behaviour. All modern websites should have both an A record for legacy compatibility, and an AAAA record to future-proof for the gradual shift towards IPv6 addresses.

  • CNAME - Alias to another domain name (e.g. example.com).

    DNS servers will recursively lookup records for the aliased domain name until they reach an IP address (in an A or AAAA record).

  • MX - Specify a Mail Exchange server (e.g. mail.example.com).

    This record tells email SMTP servers where to direct emails to. For instance, the MX record for aezign.com.au is mail.aezign.au; this directs SMTP servers like Gmail and Outlook to send emails to the mailserver running at mail.aezign.au. This also allows specifying a priority field, so that you can define multiple MX records (such as a main and a backup) and consumers will try to connect to the listed mailservers from lowest priority to highest.

  • TXT - Store arbitrary text data

    This is most commonly used for site verification (for instance, to link your website to Google Search Console) and for email security measures like DKIM, DMARC, and SPF.

  • NS - Specify the nameservers for a domain (e.g. zeus.ns.cloudflare.com).

    These authoritative nameservers are responsible for providing all the other record types when needed.

dig lets you query each of these. For instance, to list the MX records against aezign.com.au:

$ dig MX aezign.com.au

; <<>> DiG 9.20.29-1-Debian <<>> MX aezign.com.au
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 28213
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 1232
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;aezign.com.au.                 IN      MX

;; ANSWER SECTION:
aezign.com.au.          300     IN      MX      10 mail.aezign.au.

;; Query time: 104 msec
;; SERVER: 1.1.1.1#53(1.1.1.1) (UDP)
;; WHEN: Sun Sep 27 22:04:58 AWST 2026
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 70

Here you can see there is only one mailserver configured for aezign.com.au, which is mail.aezign.au, and it has a priority of 10.

If you compare this against something like gmail.com:

$ dig MX gmail.com

; <<>> DiG 9.20.29-1-Debian <<>> MX gmail.com
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 16538
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 5, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 1232
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;gmail.com.                     IN      MX

;; ANSWER SECTION:
gmail.com.              2497    IN      MX      40 alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com.
gmail.com.              2497    IN      MX      20 alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com.
gmail.com.              2497    IN      MX      5 gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com.
gmail.com.              2497    IN      MX      10 alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com.
gmail.com.              2497    IN      MX      30 alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com.

;; Query time: 120 msec
;; SERVER: 1.1.1.1#53(1.1.1.1) (UDP)
;; WHEN: Sun Sep 27 22:06:04 AWST 2026
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 161

You can see that gmail.com has several mailservers configured as redundancies due to the Gmail's sheer scale. gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com has the highest priority of 5, so SMTP servers will attempt to contact that mailserver first, followed by alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com and so on.

Nameservers

Now there needs to be somewhere for DNS records against a domain name to be defined, right? This is where nameservers come in.

Nameservers are DNS servers that answer queries about the domains they are authoritative for i.e. the domains they are in charge of. For example, the authoritative nameservers for example.com are hera.ns.cloudflare.com and elliott.ns.cloudflare.com, which means Cloudflare's nameservers are the source of truth when looking up DNS records for example.com. You can check this with dig:

$ dig NS example.com

; <<>> DiG 9.20.29-1-Debian <<>> NS example.com
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 37717
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 1232
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;example.com.                   IN      NS

;; ANSWER SECTION:
example.com.            81837   IN      NS      hera.ns.cloudflare.com.
example.com.            81837   IN      NS      elliott.ns.cloudflare.com.

;; Query time: 140 msec
;; SERVER: 1.1.1.1#53(1.1.1.1) (UDP)
;; WHEN: Sun Sep 27 23:27:19 AWST 2026
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 95

Nameservers are configured with your domain name's registrar. The nameserver you set dictates where your remaining DNS records will live. For example.com, this means you would configure all your records on Cloudflare's dashboard, since they are responsible for the domain's DNS records.

Recursive resolution

The DNS servers that our computers use follow a recursive resolution process behind-the-scenes to find the authoritative nameservers for a domain, followed by the records you are querying.

Finding the root nameservers

Due to the recursive nature of the resolution process, there needs to be a starting point: the root (.) nameservers. The resolver uses a fixed list of root nameservers called root hints issued by IANA (named.root), to locate and contact the root nameservers. Resolvers will have this provided to them initially, and can dynamically update it themselves by querying one of the root nameservers for the root NS records to obtain a fresh list. For instance, we can query 198.41.0.4 (a.root-servers.net) to obtain a new list of root nameservers:

$ dig @198.41.0.4 NS .

; <<>> DiG 9.20.29-1-Debian <<>> @198.41.0.4 NS .
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 43677
;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 13, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 27
;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;.                              IN      NS

;; ANSWER SECTION:
.                       518400  IN      NS      l.root-servers.net.
.                       518400  IN      NS      j.root-servers.net.
.                       518400  IN      NS      f.root-servers.net.
.                       518400  IN      NS      h.root-servers.net.
.                       518400  IN      NS      d.root-servers.net.
.                       518400  IN      NS      b.root-servers.net.
.                       518400  IN      NS      k.root-servers.net.
.                       518400  IN      NS      i.root-servers.net.
.                       518400  IN      NS      m.root-servers.net.
.                       518400  IN      NS      e.root-servers.net.
.                       518400  IN      NS      g.root-servers.net.
.                       518400  IN      NS      c.root-servers.net.
.                       518400  IN      NS      a.root-servers.net.

;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
l.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      A       199.7.83.42
l.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      AAAA    2001:500:9f::42
j.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      A       192.58.128.30
j.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      AAAA    2001:503:c27::2:30
f.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      A       192.5.5.241
f.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      AAAA    2001:500:2f::f
h.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      A       198.97.190.53
h.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      AAAA    2001:500:1::53
d.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      A       199.7.91.13
d.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      AAAA    2001:500:2d::d
b.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      A       170.247.170.2
b.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      AAAA    2801:1b8:10::b
k.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      A       193.0.14.129
k.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      AAAA    2001:7fd::1
i.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      A       192.36.148.17
i.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      AAAA    2001:7fe::53
m.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      A       202.12.27.33
m.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      AAAA    2001:dc3::35
e.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      A       192.203.230.10
e.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      AAAA    2001:500:a8::e
g.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      A       192.112.36.4
g.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      AAAA    2001:500:12::d0d
c.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      A       192.33.4.12
c.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      AAAA    2001:500:2::c
a.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      A       198.41.0.4
a.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      AAAA    2001:503:ba3e::2:30

;; Query time: 476 msec
;; SERVER: 198.41.0.4#53(198.41.0.4) (UDP)
;; WHEN: Mon Sep 28 00:01:08 AWST 2026
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 811

Querying the root nameservers

For example.com, the first step is to query the root (.) nameservers to find the nameservers for the .com top-level domain (TLD). Using a.root-servers.net again:

$ dig @198.41.0.4 NS com

; <<>> DiG 9.20.29-1-Debian <<>> @198.41.0.4 NS com
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 22528
;; flags: qr rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 13, ADDITIONAL: 27
;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;com.                           IN      NS

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
com.                    172800  IN      NS      l.gtld-servers.net.
com.                    172800  IN      NS      j.gtld-servers.net.
com.                    172800  IN      NS      h.gtld-servers.net.
com.                    172800  IN      NS      d.gtld-servers.net.
com.                    172800  IN      NS      b.gtld-servers.net.
com.                    172800  IN      NS      f.gtld-servers.net.
com.                    172800  IN      NS      k.gtld-servers.net.
com.                    172800  IN      NS      m.gtld-servers.net.
com.                    172800  IN      NS      i.gtld-servers.net.
com.                    172800  IN      NS      g.gtld-servers.net.
com.                    172800  IN      NS      a.gtld-servers.net.
com.                    172800  IN      NS      c.gtld-servers.net.
com.                    172800  IN      NS      e.gtld-servers.net.

;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
l.gtld-servers.net.     172800  IN      A       192.41.162.30
l.gtld-servers.net.     172800  IN      AAAA    2001:500:d937::30
j.gtld-servers.net.     172800  IN      A       192.48.79.30
j.gtld-servers.net.     172800  IN      AAAA    2001:502:7094::30
h.gtld-servers.net.     172800  IN      A       192.54.112.30
h.gtld-servers.net.     172800  IN      AAAA    2001:502:8cc::30
d.gtld-servers.net.     172800  IN      A       192.31.80.30
d.gtld-servers.net.     172800  IN      AAAA    2001:500:856e::30
b.gtld-servers.net.     172800  IN      A       192.33.14.30
b.gtld-servers.net.     172800  IN      AAAA    2001:503:231d::2:30
f.gtld-servers.net.     172800  IN      A       192.35.51.30
f.gtld-servers.net.     172800  IN      AAAA    2001:503:d414::30
k.gtld-servers.net.     172800  IN      A       192.52.178.30
k.gtld-servers.net.     172800  IN      AAAA    2001:503:d2d::30
m.gtld-servers.net.     172800  IN      A       192.55.83.30
m.gtld-servers.net.     172800  IN      AAAA    2001:501:b1f9::30
i.gtld-servers.net.     172800  IN      A       192.43.172.30
i.gtld-servers.net.     172800  IN      AAAA    2001:503:39c1::30
g.gtld-servers.net.     172800  IN      A       192.42.93.30
g.gtld-servers.net.     172800  IN      AAAA    2001:503:eea3::30
a.gtld-servers.net.     172800  IN      A       192.5.6.30
a.gtld-servers.net.     172800  IN      AAAA    2001:503:a83e::2:30
c.gtld-servers.net.     172800  IN      A       192.26.92.30
c.gtld-servers.net.     172800  IN      AAAA    2001:503:83eb::30
e.gtld-servers.net.     172800  IN      A       192.12.94.30
e.gtld-servers.net.     172800  IN      AAAA    2001:502:1ca1::30

;; Query time: 772 msec
;; SERVER: 198.41.0.4#53(198.41.0.4) (UDP)
;; WHEN: Mon Sep 28 00:09:25 AWST 2026
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 828

Querying the TLD nameservers

Now the resolver has .com nameservers and their IPs. We can use one of these, such as 192.5.6.30 (a.gtld-servers.net) to find the nameservers for example.com:

$ dig @192.5.6.30 NS example.com

; <<>> DiG 9.20.29-1-Debian <<>> @192.5.6.30 NS example.com
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 37419
;; flags: qr rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 13
;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;example.com.                   IN      NS

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
example.com.            172800  IN      NS      hera.ns.cloudflare.com.
example.com.            172800  IN      NS      elliott.ns.cloudflare.com.

;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
hera.ns.cloudflare.com. 172800  IN      A       108.162.192.162
hera.ns.cloudflare.com. 172800  IN      A       172.64.32.162
hera.ns.cloudflare.com. 172800  IN      A       173.245.58.162
hera.ns.cloudflare.com. 172800  IN      AAAA    2606:4700:50::adf5:3aa2
hera.ns.cloudflare.com. 172800  IN      AAAA    2803:f800:50::6ca2:c0a2
hera.ns.cloudflare.com. 172800  IN      AAAA    2a06:98c1:50::ac40:20a2
elliott.ns.cloudflare.com. 172800 IN    A       108.162.195.228
elliott.ns.cloudflare.com. 172800 IN    A       162.159.44.228
elliott.ns.cloudflare.com. 172800 IN    A       172.64.35.228
elliott.ns.cloudflare.com. 172800 IN    AAAA    2606:4700:58::a29f:2ce4
elliott.ns.cloudflare.com. 172800 IN    AAAA    2803:f800:50::6ca2:c3e4
elliott.ns.cloudflare.com. 172800 IN    AAAA    2a06:98c1:50::ac40:23e4

;; Query time: 80 msec
;; SERVER: 192.5.6.30#53(192.5.6.30) (UDP)
;; WHEN: Mon Sep 28 00:12:19 AWST 2026
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 359

Finding the domain's nameserver

The response tells the resolver that the nameservers for example.com are hera.ns.cloudflare.com and elliott.ns.cloudflare.com. Now since these Cloudflare nameservers are also .com domains and Cloudflare is so commonly used, the .com nameserver provides optional sibling glue records as defined in RFC 9471 to prevent further roundtrips and optimize the process.

If we ignore the sibling glue records provided, the resolver would have to ask the .com nameservers for the nameservers for cloudflare.com:

$ dig @192.5.6.30 NS cloudflare.com

; <<>> DiG 9.20.29-1-Debian <<>> @192.5.6.30 NS cloudflare.com
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 40307
;; flags: qr rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 5, ADDITIONAL: 21
;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;cloudflare.com.                        IN      NS

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
cloudflare.com.         172800  IN      NS      ns3.cloudflare.com.
cloudflare.com.         172800  IN      NS      ns5.cloudflare.com.
cloudflare.com.         172800  IN      NS      ns4.cloudflare.com.
cloudflare.com.         172800  IN      NS      ns6.cloudflare.com.
cloudflare.com.         172800  IN      NS      ns7.cloudflare.com.

;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
ns3.cloudflare.com.     172800  IN      A       162.159.0.33
ns3.cloudflare.com.     172800  IN      A       162.159.7.226
ns3.cloudflare.com.     172800  IN      AAAA    2400:cb00:2049:1::a29f:21
ns3.cloudflare.com.     172800  IN      AAAA    2400:cb00:2049:1::a29f:7e2
ns5.cloudflare.com.     172800  IN      A       162.159.2.9
ns5.cloudflare.com.     172800  IN      A       162.159.9.55
ns5.cloudflare.com.     172800  IN      AAAA    2400:cb00:2049:1::a29f:209
ns5.cloudflare.com.     172800  IN      AAAA    2400:cb00:2049:1::a29f:937
ns4.cloudflare.com.     172800  IN      A       162.159.1.33
ns4.cloudflare.com.     172800  IN      A       162.159.8.55
ns4.cloudflare.com.     172800  IN      AAAA    2400:cb00:2049:1::a29f:121
ns4.cloudflare.com.     172800  IN      AAAA    2400:cb00:2049:1::a29f:837
ns6.cloudflare.com.     172800  IN      A       162.159.3.11
ns6.cloudflare.com.     172800  IN      A       162.159.5.6
ns6.cloudflare.com.     172800  IN      AAAA    2400:cb00:2049:1::a29f:30b
ns6.cloudflare.com.     172800  IN      AAAA    2400:cb00:2049:1::a29f:506
ns7.cloudflare.com.     172800  IN      A       162.159.4.8
ns7.cloudflare.com.     172800  IN      A       162.159.6.6
ns7.cloudflare.com.     172800  IN      AAAA    2400:cb00:2049:1::a29f:408
ns7.cloudflare.com.     172800  IN      AAAA    2400:cb00:2049:1::a29f:606

;; Query time: 163 msec
;; SERVER: 192.5.6.30#53(192.5.6.30) (UDP)
;; WHEN: Mon Sep 28 00:26:53 AWST 2026
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 573

Here, the .com nameserver provides in-domain glue records for cloudflare.com's nameservers. Without these, there would be a circular dependency, since the nameserver named is a subdomain of the domain being queried for. This is because nameservers are always defined by name, which means that in order to actually contact the nameserver, your computer needs to obtain its IP address with another DNS lookup.

Next, we'd use one of these nameservers, say ns3.cloudflare.com, to obtain the IP for hera.ns.cloudflare.com:

$ dig @162.159.0.33 hera.ns.cloudflare.com

; <<>> DiG 9.20.29-1-Debian <<>> @162.159.0.33 hera.ns.cloudflare.com
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 16801
;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 3, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 1232
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;hera.ns.cloudflare.com.                IN      A

;; ANSWER SECTION:
hera.ns.cloudflare.com. 86353   IN      A       108.162.192.162
hera.ns.cloudflare.com. 86353   IN      A       173.245.58.162
hera.ns.cloudflare.com. 86353   IN      A       172.64.32.162

;; Query time: 123 msec
;; SERVER: 162.159.0.33#53(162.159.0.33) (UDP)
;; WHEN: Mon Sep 28 01:11:37 AWST 2026
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 99

Querying the domain's authoritative nameserver

Now we've reached the authoritative nameserver for example.com! The last thing to do is to fetch the A record for example.com to obtain its server's IP address:

$ dig @108.162.192.162 example.com

; <<>> DiG 9.20.29-1-Debian <<>> @108.162.192.162 example.com
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 43082
;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 1232
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;example.com.                   IN      A

;; ANSWER SECTION:
example.com.            300     IN      A       104.20.23.154
example.com.            300     IN      A       172.66.147.243

;; Query time: 123 msec
;; SERVER: 108.162.192.162#53(108.162.192.162) (UDP)
;; WHEN: Mon Sep 28 01:13:47 AWST 2026
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 72

At last, we've determined that the IP addresses of the servers behind example.com are 104.20.23.154 and 172.66.147.243. This matches our earlier lookup directly against your computer's configured DNS server.

The DNS servers your computer uses encapsulate this recursive resolution process behind the scenes, so that your computer only needs to make one round trip, and the servers can use their much faster data center connections and caching to optimize the process and make the query as fast as possible.

Checking DNS records

To check a website's records, the first thing to do is to ensure the domain name is pointed at the correct nameserver. For instance, aezign.com.au is supposed to use Cloudflare, since that is where all the DNS records have been set up. We can verify this using dig, (or alternatively with online tools like dnschecker.org):

$ dig NS aezign.com.au

; <<>> DiG 9.20.29-1-Debian <<>> NS aezign.com.au
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 44172
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 1232
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;aezign.com.au.                 IN      NS

;; ANSWER SECTION:
aezign.com.au.          86400   IN      NS      rosalie.ns.cloudflare.com.
aezign.com.au.          86400   IN      NS      zeus.ns.cloudflare.com.

;; Query time: 92 msec
;; SERVER: 1.1.1.1#53(1.1.1.1) (UDP)
;; WHEN: Mon Sep 28 01:39:22 AWST 2026
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 100

If this is not set correctly, the DNS records you configure will not work, as resolvers will be fetching records from somewhere else. In most cases, you can update this in your domain registrar's settings. This is especially common for new domain names, which default to the registrar's nameservers; unless you plan to use their built-in DNS management, you'll need to point them to your chosen provider.

Now we can check that the DNS records configured match those your DNS server returns. For aezign.com.au, these are the MX and TXT records configured on Cloudflare.

Extract of Cloudflare's DNS record listing showing the MX record and TXT records for aezign.com.au.

The MX record and some TXT records configured for aezign.com.au on Cloudflare's dashboard.

We can check these using dig, and using the +short option to show only the content of the records.

$ dig MX aezign.com.au +short

10 mail.aezign.au.

$ dig TXT aezign.com.au +short

"google-site-verification=KFqTU5xH8fFf6OtszEL4oudfxple29Tm-TvxVtCWkAM"
"v=spf1 mx a:mail.aezign.au -all"

$ dig TXT _dmarc.aezign.com.au +short

"v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=quarantine;adkim=r;aspf=r"

$ dig TXT aezign.com.au-2026._domainkey.aezign.com.au +short

"v=DKIM1; h=sha256; k=rsa; s=email; p=MIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAzL04yXZgB72YkoxS+tLK//aWx65TS4UA3F0qJ7el68SEuD4ehmg+61Ta9iS31H6U074dnjyoPDeaiGBa7ToTNCtiIts4/ghD/8nrENROE6hQAwRmTK18ODDHrRDW73hWe6Dg4cK5vmXi82/wWRZU9SDKbme28IE9uCVir3lCkKYLs1" "j16gR1Sjqr6a2+3o+EeVXnLJ4wXmJMm7KCIdn7zv0t9Z1eYcw672PdpYPAMpGb8uUsgaDBsNSpTcupPkz4SWj6TrOB80CPHjWseVY8EOJeRsNKQ/8LFoQEBl4Rxtb3HAmu4UIxSZ4QMVOLnXz67e85mA5XjcNIsVMzaWaowwIDAQAB"

As we can see, this matches, which means that the nameservers for aezign.com.au are correct and the DNS records are what we intend them to be.

Note that if you've recently changed the nameserver or DNS records for your domain, it can take anywhere between 10 seconds and 24 hours for the changes to take effect and propagate across the different DNS servers globally. Tools like dnschecker.org can check your records on different DNS servers worldwide to see if they're reflecting your changes. The reason for this is caching: DNS servers like 1.1.1.1 will cache results so it doesn't have to do the full resolution process every time, and uses the Time-To-Live (TTL) you configure in your DNS records as a guideline for caching duration.

16:21

Link [Scripting News]

Before long we’ll have Ukraine style drones raining down on American cities. Meanwhile we have built a military designed to fight WWII. We’d better hope Ukraine wins their war with Russia, and they’re still our friends. Journalism is letting us down bigtime here. The world is at war, it's going to get worse, and the US isn't preparing. We should be defending Ukraine with everything we have, we are still powerful enough to determine the outcome. But of course we are totally asleep at the wheel, gloating over Trump's approval rating, and how the Dems might win the Senate or whatever. Music to relax by. Bedtime stories.

15:35

Web of Markdown, part 2 [Scripting News]

The tech industry kicked the web out of the web.

scripting.com is your canary in a coal mine.

If you can read it then your browser is a real web browser.

If it can’t it’s phony baloney.

That's the big picture behind the Web of Markdown, an idea that has generated surprising interest among devs, esp now that Claude Code exists to enable weekend projects that can do miraculous things.

My longtime friend Andrew Shell has quickly put together what looks like a Chrome plugin that starts work on how to display a Markdown web page. And it looks fucking beautiful, as I imagined it might. Get rid of the bullshit just tell me what you have to say. A web that you can read. A web without interstitials. A web every write lusts for as well as an editor that can be used everywhere. This is the nightmare of the companies whose products inhabite the de-webbed web of 2026 (and that's all there is). Let's go back and pretend the VCs didn't run all their get-rich-quick schemes, what would the fucking web be like if it was all about two things -- writing and reading and the tech got out of the fucking way and let the writers do their thing. I think it'll actually work this time because they really fucked up the web and we can show them dramatically what it would be like if they hadn't. I've said this before if they insist on twisting what remains of the web into more bullshit, our option is to re-create the web and forget about them, leave them in the dust.

By the way, now I'm glad I have a source:markdown element in most of my RSS 2.0 feeds. I knew they'd come in handy! :-)

Back to Andrew's project, I said in a comment, I want more Markdown and absolutely no Chrome.

I have to trust Google for far too many things, but I think we can get rid of our dependency on Chrome. Now is the best time in a long time, as there's a hybrid product forming and they don't have the best AI system, and btw -- even if they did as users we are highly motivated for them to get some competition. And the AI companies don't do HTML or CSS, they do Markdown. So much so that Google had to convert their office product to Markdown before OpenAI would work with them. The wind is blowing away from Google and into Markdown, and I'm going to insist that they support HTTP in addition to HTTPS to make sure Google hears loud and clear that they can't run the web as if it were a corporate platform.

14:49

Link [Scripting News]

BTW, Mets fans do not root for the Yankees, while Yankees fans are happy to wear Mets caps when we're on top. Their only philosophy is that the Yankees always win and if they don't we hate them. And the Mets' philosophy is incomprehensible (I hear) to Yankees fans. Our philosophy is to have a philosophy and there's nothing about winning in there because the love of the Mets is rooted in a team that couldn't even run the bases. They were loved because they were losers, probably because we knew their fate was to reward our belief in them. Now this year the Mets sucked. The reason why is kind of obvious. The Mets got confused, and they thought they were the Yankees. That. Does. Not. Work. And we already have one heartless low-philosophy baseball team in NYC, we sure as hell don't need another one. But this year is different because we have the fucking Knicks, who won in 5 and it would have been a clean sweep if it weren't for that buzzkill mofo, Trump. So anyway, I hear the Yankees were eliminated yesterday. Well then, it's on with the NBA season now and we'll try again with the Mets in April, or more realistically after the NBA championship for the new season is settled.

[$] The [vx]swap showdown [LWN.net]

The kernel's swap layer has undergone some significant changes over the course of the last year and a number of longstanding problems have been addressed. One problem that has not yet been solved in the mainline is the direct tie between slots in the swap cache and space in persistent swap files, which can cause highly inefficient resource use. There are two competing solutions for this problem, neither of which has, as yet, reached readiness for merging; a lengthy discussion on possible paths forward shows ongoing disagreement over the best path forward.

Security updates for Thursday [LWN.net]

Security updates have been issued by AlmaLinux (bind, firefox, freerdp, ghostscript, glibc, kernel, kernel-rt, perl-DBI, python3.12, rust-rpm-sequoia, rust-sequoia-sq, rust-sequoia-sqv, and vim), Debian (gst-plugins-base1.0, python3.11, and xz-utils), Fedora (7zip, chromium, curl, docker-buildx, kernel, Lmod, and sos), Mageia (tesseract), Oracle (dovecot, firefox, freerdp, gd, ghostscript, kernel, librabbitmq, perl-DBI, python3.12, rust-rpm-sequoia, rust-sequoia-sqv, sg3_utils, vim, and virtuoso-opensource), Slackware (xorg-server), SUSE (aliyun-cli, busybox, cadvisor, chromedriver, chromium, crane, distribution-registry, fetchmail, fio, ghostscript, golang-github-prometheus-alertmanager, google-osconfig-agent, govulncheck-vulndb, libsoup, libXtst, openexr, prometheus-blackbox_exporter, python-fsspec, rpcbind, rsyslog, rustup, wireshark, wpa_supplicant, and zcode), and Ubuntu (erlang, golang-golang-x-net, gst-plugins-ugly1.0, lxml, poppler, and sudo).

14:00

The Preservation Gap in the AI Stack: Why Capability Is Advancing Faster Than Reconstructability [Radar]

Artificial intelligence systems are difficult to reproduce because their behavior depends on nondeterministic models and on data, configurations, policies, and external services that continue to change. But exact reproducibility is not always what operators, investigators, or auditors need. They often need something different: historical reconstructability. The central claim is that reconstructability is a system property established during execution, not inferred later from surviving artifacts. To make that property concrete, this article introduces Orrery, a reference architecture for preserving the runtime bindings and historical dependency states needed to reconstruct an AI system’s past execution.

Imagine an AI-assisted decision that must be examined six months after it was made. Rerunning the system may produce a different answer, but an investigator may still need to determine which model endpoint, policy, retrieved data, tool contract, and runtime configuration were used at the time. That is the problem addressed here.

The AI industry remains much better at evaluating capability than at preserving the knowledge required to understand past executions. Evaluation pipelines track benchmark scores, task success rates, retrieval precision and recall, tool-call success rates, latency, and cost, and they grow more elaborate with every release. In practice, this machinery often reduces to one acceptance question: What can this system do? That question captures capability, but not whether a past execution will remain understandable after the system changes.

That missing property is historical reconstructability: the ability to establish which dependencies were used and under which conditions a particular execution occurred. It is related to, but distinct from, reproducibility. Reproducibility asks whether a result can be produced again under equivalent conditions. Reconstructability asks whether the conditions of the original execution can still be identified, even when repeating that execution would not produce an identical result.

This distinction matters when a consequential AI execution completes successfully today and is challenged six months later. The model may still exist in a registry. The application revision may still exist in Git. The trace may still identify the request and the services it crossed. Yet none of these records necessarily reveals which model endpoint served the request, which input transformation and runtime configuration were applied, which data, feature state, or retrieved context entered the computation, or which policy state governed it. In an agentic system, the missing history may also include memory, tool contracts, delegation, and external effects. Even when a dependency identifier was recorded, the historical state to which it referred may no longer be available or resolvable.

The problem is that an AI runtime may use dependencies whose historical identities and relationships are not preserved. This is an architectural problem, not merely a logging problem. The gap lies between what the runtime uses and what the surrounding infrastructure is required to preserve. I call this the preservation gap. The AI stack preserves models, code, deployments, and observations, but it does not require the effective historical configuration of a particular execution to remain available. The components may remain while the relations that made them one execution disappear. An AI runtime must assemble today’s execution; it is not necessarily required to remember exactly what it assembled yesterday. Reconstructability must therefore be established during execution, before later mutation erases the bindings that gave the execution its effective configuration.

Hermetic builds illustrate the opposite design pattern. They close the dependency graph before execution begins by pinning inputs, versions, and external dependencies. AI runtimes face the reverse situation: Part of the dependency graph remains open until execution, as model endpoints may resolve through mutable aliases, data and feature state evolve, runtime configuration and policy change, and retrieved context is selected only when a request is processed. Agentic systems extend the graph further through memory, tools, delegation, and external effects. In a hermetic build, dependency closure is an input. In a modern AI runtime, part of it may be an output of the run.

Version control records source evolution, transaction logs record state transitions, and distributed tracing records execution relationships. These mechanisms preserve different views of a run but not its materially relevant execution-specific configuration. A trace may retain execution flow, a deployment manifest the declared application state, and a model registry the model revision. What is often missing is the record of which artifacts and states were bound together in a particular execution.

The dependency graph no longer closes at deployment

A deployment records the configuration known before execution begins. AI systems are harder to reconstruct because materially relevant dependencies are selected during execution rather than fixed at deployment. At inference time, the system may resolve a model endpoint, input transformation, data or feature state, retrieved context, runtime configuration, safety controls, and policy. Agentic systems extend this composition through memory, tools, delegation, and external effects. These execution-specific selections are runtime bindings: facts about what the execution actually used.

The following example makes this distinction concrete. Consider a hypothetical agentic execution identified as E891. During this execution, the system retrieves two documents, evaluates a policy, invokes a tool, and produces an external effect. The deployment may identify application revision 8f31c2 and model v17, while the execution itself binds prompt h31, retrieval index r42, entities d182@17 and d761@4, tool contract h42, policy v8, and ultimately effect e3. The deployment system could not have known this entire set in advance, because some of these dependencies were selected only as the execution proceeded.

The difference between what a deployment declared and what an execution actually used becomes consequential when dependencies change. A model alias may resolve differently, a feature or data source may change, preprocessing and runtime configuration may evolve, and policy v8 may become v9. In agentic systems, retrieved context, memory, and tool contracts introduce further independent mutation. Deployment identity describes what was declared, but the historical record of an execution must describe what was actually used. Unless those binding relations are captured when they occur, the effective configuration of E891 cannot be recovered reliably from later system state.

Figure 1. A deployment captures the initial configuration, while its execution-scoped dependency closure emerges as additional dependencies are bound during execution.Figure 1. A deployment captures the initial configuration, while its execution-scoped dependency closure emerges as additional dependencies are bound during execution. (Diagram by the author.)

Current state is a lossy projection

Once runtime bindings are treated as part of the execution, the limitation of current-state records becomes clear. The execution-scoped dependency closure is the combination of the declared state and the runtime bindings that formed the effective configuration of a particular execution.

As dependencies mutate, different historical executions can leave behind the same observable evidence. The current state may show which artifacts still exist without revealing which combination a particular execution used. Once the distinguishing bindings are gone, the history cannot be reconstructed from what remains. A system can retain its artifacts while losing reconstructability: An identifier proves neither that a dependency was used nor that the historical state it denotes remains available. Reconstructability therefore requires durable binding relations and continued access to the historical states they identify.

Existence is not usage

The existence of an artifact and its use in a particular execution are different facts. Concurrent versions, caches, retries, and asynchronous changes make it unreliable to infer whether an execution used an artifact merely because that artifact existed at the relevant time.

W3C PROV already provides the relevant semantic distinction: An activity can use an entity. The missing primitive is therefore not a new provenance vocabulary, but a runtime requirement to record which dependency a particular execution used and to preserve an identity that can be resolved later.

This requirement also exposes the limit of observability. OpenTelemetry can transport dependency identifiers through attributes, links, context, and baggage, but encoding an identifier does not preserve its historical meaning. A trace may retain execution topology while the identities that explain it disappear. Instrumentation can carry preservation metadata, but it cannot guarantee durable storage or continued resolution of the referenced states.

Historical reconstructability therefore requires more than retained artifacts. For a defined class of executions and a specified retention period, the system must preserve two properties: binding integrity, which records which dependency versions and states an execution actually used, and resolution integrity, which keeps those recorded identities resolvable to the historical states they denote.

Preservation requires failure semantics

Once reconstructability is treated as a system property, the architecture must define what happens when the records required to reconstruct an execution fail to reach durable storage. Suppose policy v8 authorizes execution E891 to invoke tool contract h42, and the tool commits effect e3. If the usage record fails to reach durable storage, the action succeeds while the historical links among the effect, its policy, the tool contract, and the execution context are lost. The external effect remains, but the historical record no longer reliably explains which policy and tool contract authorized it. The external world and the historical record have diverged.

Figure 2. Execution E891 branches into a committed external effect and a failed usage record.Figure 2. Execution E891 branches into a committed external effect and a failed usage record. (Diagram by the author.)

Figure 2 shows why this condition cannot be treated as ordinary telemetry loss. When an external effect has been committed but the corresponding usage record is missing, the architecture does not guarantee historical reconstructability. It provides only best-effort historical evidence.

Reconstructability becomes an engineering guarantee only when the architecture defines when preservation records become durable and what the system does if they cannot be stored.

A system may require a durable usage record before committing the effect, atomically persist the effect intent and preservation record through a transactional outbox, quarantine the execution for reconciliation, or trigger a compensating action. The implementation is application-specific, but preservation failure must have explicit semantics rather than disappear into telemetry.

Existing technologies provide the building blocks for this layer. Provenance and lineage models represent relations, tracing propagates execution context, registries identify versions, and content-addressed stores preserve artifacts. None, however, creates a runtime obligation to preserve the execution-scoped dependency closure required for reconstruction.

This layer is a preservation plane: the contract and machinery that keep an execution’s dependency closure identifiable as its surrounding systems change. It defines what to record, how records become durable, and how referenced states remain resolvable. Orrery applies this principle as a reference architecture in which materially relevant runtime bindings are captured when they occur and retained together with resolvable identities for the historical states they reference.

AIGov Core: reconstructability as a tested property

AIGov Core provides a limited implementation of this principle. Its evidence ledger stores hash-chained events, while its replay engine reconstructs a governance verdict from a stored export without querying live state. A companion check labels the export Ready, Partial, or NotReady according to unresolved lineage, missing policy artifacts, version drift, or replay failure. This demonstrates that reconstructability can be tested, but it does not solve the complete preservation problem. The system can replay only what was recorded; it cannot recover a runtime binding that was never captured.

The preservation gap is the mismatch between what an execution depends on and what the system persists. Closing it requires a runtime obligation: Whenever an execution binds materially relevant state, the system must record that binding, preserve a durable identity for the dependency, and retain access to the historical state it denotes for the defined retention period. Reconstructability is therefore not a by-product of capability or observability. It is an architectural property that must be designed, tested, and enforced during execution.

12:42

Racing Trains [The Daily WTF]

Robert G sends us a WTF from the outside, but I think we can come up with some hypotheses about what actually happened.

Robert was traveling by train. For complicated train reasons, the car he was seated on was not actually scheduled to continue with the train he was booked to ride, the replacement car missed its scheduled arrival, and the result was that Robert was left at a station needing to rebook his travel.

Now, given that this is in a region of the world with a fairly robust train network, this represented a hiccup of thirty minutes in a many hour trip. Not a particularly big deal. But Robert didn't want to get stranded any longer than he had to, so he took out his phone, fired up the train company's app, and made sure he had a reservation on the next train. He got the confirmation, and grabbed a coffee while he waited.

Not quite thirty minutes later, Robert boarded the train and went towards his reserved seat. Another passenger approached from the opposite direction, and they met at the seat. "Excuse me," Robert said, "but I reserved this one."

"No, I reserved this one."

Being reasonable people, they both pulled out their phones and pulled up their apps. Sure enough, each one of them was confirmed for that seat. Since the email confirmation had more details than the app provided, they both pulled up the email. Same seat. Both confirmed. The timestamp of the reservation? The same, down to the second.

"I don't think the conductor will let us sit in each other's laps," the other passenger said.

As it turned out, there was enough room on the train that no lap sitting was required. Everyone got a seat, even if it wasn't the one they reserved.

But the story stuck with Robert. A major transit provider had a reservation system that clearly had a race condition. It seemed like the most basic example of race conditions too, the kind you're shown in college to explain the basic concept.

"Check if the seat is reserved, and if it's not, reserve it." Because that sequence isn't atomic, two different threads could do the check, see it's not reserved, and then reserve it. I suppose it's at least something that one reservation doesn't overwrite the other, which at least indicates that a reservation is its own record.

The real question is this: this has to happen with some frequency, so how has nobody fixed it?

The real answer: they probably just don't care, either because they literally don't care, or because their software is such a trashfire that this doesn't even rise to the top ten bugs. It's likely a mix of both.

[Advertisement] Keep all your packages and Docker containers in one place, scan for vulnerabilities, and control who can access different feeds. ProGet installs in minutes and has a powerful free version with a lot of great features that you can upgrade when ready.Learn more.

12:35

How Technology Empowers—and Imperils—Dictators [Schneier on Security]

This essay was written with Seva Gunitsky, and originally appeared in Foreign Affairs.

Two weeks after Moscow’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in March 2022, the Russian TV Channel One editor Marina Ovsyannikova burst onto the set of the evening newscast. She held up a hand-drawn sign behind the anchor’s head that read: “Stop the war. Don’t believe propaganda. They’re lying to you!” She shouted, “No to war!” until she was dragged away.

No one has protested the war on Russian television since then, partly as a result of tighter security and a general climate of fear. But in October 2024, Margarita Simonyan, one of Russia’s chief propagandists, gave another explanation. A growing number of the RT network’s anchors, she explained to an interviewer, are not real. “That face doesn’t exist. We generated the voice and everything else.” They were, she meant, produced by artificial intelligence. In a follow-up interview with the newspaper Vedomosti, she spelled out the logic: “These anchors don’t need a salary or insurance,” she said. “They won’t get arrested, and the police won’t search their homes. It’s all wonderful and terrifying at the same time.”

This is AI’s promise to every autocratic ruler: the ability to maintain control without delegating tasks to unreliable humans. It is an extremely attractive prospect. No matter how powerful, dictators have always needed subordinates—censors, propagandists, security guards, police officers, intelligence analysts, and local bureaucrats—to carry out their orders. But subordinates always pose a potential threat. They could shirk, steal, lie, leak, or conspire against their boss. As a result, one of the oldest dilemmas facing autocrats is how to empower agents to carry out orders without also enabling them to turn against their leader. Autocrats have usually managed the tradeoff by filling key positions with mediocrities whose incapacity is, as the political theorist Hannah Arendt put it, “the best guarantee of their loyalty.” But this inevitably makes it harder for dictatorships to govern and survive crises.

AI appears to offer autocrats two ways to resolve this long-standing dilemma. First, it means they can now easily monitor and discipline their followers in real time. A change in a local official’s spending habits or meeting schedules can be flagged automatically by an AI system, without any need for self-interested informants. Second, AI can eliminate underlings altogether. By automating tasks that once required human discretion, rulers can replace unreliable intermediaries with faithful algorithms that cannot be bribed or manipulated. Officials in autocratic regimes have said as much. AI “can definitely replace half of officials,” Russia’s Digital Development Minister, Maksut Shadaev, told a Moscow data forum in April 2025, adding, “maybe slightly more.”

Yet these promises of a self-running state are illusory, because AI is never truly autonomous. Systems have to be built and maintained by a cadre of engineers and data scientists whose expertise political leaders cannot evaluate. The ruler who turns to AI to reduce a dependence on unreliable humans may end up relying, more blindly than before, on the few AI specialists who keep the system running. And this new digital Praetorian Guard may have the same weaknesses as the old, which makes it a threat to the ruler.

Eyes and Ears

China is in the lead when it comes to developing AI systems that can monitor or replace subordinates. Smart city programs in Beijing, Shanghai, and other urban centers use AI to track performance and centralize oversight of local officials who once operated in comfortable obscurity, subjecting them to an algorithmic performance review. China also developed a “Zero Trust AI system,” which it deployed across roughly 30 counties and cities over the past decade. This system cross-referenced more than 150 government databases to catch embezzlement and nepotism by local officials. It worked a little too well, flagging 8,700 officials before local governments, under pressure from the bureaucrats it was monitoring, began rolling it back. But Beijing has not gotten rid of its new e-government portals, which use automated systems for issuing documents and permits, reducing face-to-face interactions that bred petty corruption or favoritism. The Chinese Communist Party, meanwhile, has plowed ahead with researching what it calls “thought management,” or how to use AI to create microtargeted propaganda. China’s army of Internet commentators, once composed of paid humans, is already being replaced by bots.

Russia has been pursuing the same goals with a similar fervor. Moscow’s citywide facial recognition system, deployed across 200,000 cameras, was used to identify and apprehend protesters during the 2021 antigovernment demonstrations. The central government has started using automated data collection and aggregation to bypass regional officials who could taint the data or use it to promote their own interests. In 2023, Russia’s Internet regulator launched Oculus, an AI system that scans hundreds of thousands of images per day for prohibited content, including political content—orders of magnitude beyond what human censors could process. The Russian security service’s Meliorator tool has been used to create over a thousand profiles of fictitious Americans, primarily on X (formerly Twitter), to spread Kremlin narratives at a fraction of the cost of human troll farms.

Other autocracies are following in Beijing’s and Moscow’s footsteps. In April 2025, the United Arab Emirates created a Regulatory Intelligence Office that uses AI to draft and amend federal laws, work once done by legislative staff. A year later, UAE Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid al-Maktoum announced that autonomous AI agents would take over half of the federal government’s operations within two years and that “the performance of ministers, directors general, and entities will be assessed based on their ability to adopt this transformation.”

These innovations may reduce the number of bureaucrats autocrats need. But they cannot actually create what dictators want most: a self-running state. Even AI-generated television anchors need people to build and maintain them, and censorship systems need people to retrain them as the vocabulary of dissent shifts. Behind every AI model, there is a small group of engineers and data scientists doing essential maintenance, and their work is so technical that rulers cannot understand it.

This dependence thus becomes another form of power. The engineers who maintain an autocrat’s surveillance apparatus, for example, can shape what the ruler sees. They decide what information is important enough to pass along and in what form to present it. They determine which threats get flagged, and they can adjust the algorithms that select what content gets suppressed and who gets arrested. And they can do this without anyone in the palace noticing. Autocrats who turn to AI to escape a dependence on unreliable subordinates have only transferred their vulnerabilities onto a new group of officials.

In fact, this new Praetorian Guard could be more dangerous than previous elites. That is in part thanks to the opacity of AI technology but also because this clique is much smaller. Roman emperors typically had tens of thousands of people serving in the Praetorian Guard; modern autocrats rely on standing armies. But with AI, autocrats will need only a small clique of engineers to build and maintain large-scale AI systems. This might benefit rulers since they will have fewer people to watch, yet it also concentrates points of failure, since a devastating disruption requires only a handful of engineers and makes it easier for members to scheme against the leader. The new guard’s members may also be indispensable. A dictator can replace generals without destroying the army. But running complex machine-learning systems requires such a specialized set of skills that engineers can be difficult to replace without disruptions, giving these actors great leverage.

The Indispensables

The importance of tech workers to autocracies has already become apparent. When IT specialists began to flee Russia after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, for example, the Kremlin responded not with threats but with inducements, offering tech workers deferments from conscription. It exempted their firms from taxes and subsidized their mortgages. When Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered the mobilization of 300,000 men seven months later, IT workers were granted full-on waivers. This might seem like overkill, given that an AI system needs only a few engineers to run it. But a regime cannot know in advance which engineers it will need, and it cannot train replacements quickly, so it has to hold on to the entire talent pool from which these few are selected.

These measures did not stem the outflow of roughly 100,000 specialists—about a tenth of Russia’s tech workforce—over the course of 2022. But Moscow stuck to bribery, because expertise is extremely difficult to conscript at gunpoint and because conscripted experts might be less likely to do as instructed. Even so, money and privilege cannot guarantee that these elites will stay loyal. Autocrats should recall the lesson of the original Praetorian Guard: for a time, it provided Roman emperors with protection and security. But then the praetorians discovered their own indispensability, and by the second century, they were auctioning off the empire to the highest bidder. This new set of elites can do the same. In June 2023, when the column of Yevgeny Prigozhin‘s Wagner paramilitary company moved up the highway toward Moscow, Putin depended on his security services to tell him what was happening. Future rulers in Putin’s position will receive such warnings through machines: intercepted communications sorted by software, camera feeds filtered through recognition systems, regional reports compiled into dashboards. The engineers who run those systems could strike a deal with an upstart challenger and then drag their feet. They could delay the data, let alerts arrive a few hours late, degrade feeds at inconvenient moments, or make a recognition system stop functioning. In that scenario, the ruler would be operating blind. The Praetorian Guard did not need to kill Emperor Nero to replace him. It simply had to abandon him for a rival.

These programmers are unlikely to seize power for themselves, because they are unlikely to carry what coup leaders ultimately require: guns. But there is already precedent for engineers using their power to shape leadership challenges. In 1991, when the Soviet army attempted to seize control from Mikhail Gorbachev, a handful of programmers at the Relcom network kept information flowing abroad and relayed Russian President Boris Yeltsin’s decrees to audiences inside the country and abroad. The plotters could not stop the news of Yeltsin’s defiance from spreading, and the coup collapsed within three days.

Slimming Down

AI will not let autocrats dismiss all their enforcers. Someone still has to make arrests and run the prisons, and autocrats can buy loyalty by offering supporters state jobs. But it will let authoritarians downsize, and the number of officials ultimately matters less than how the ruler oversees them. Keeping track of scheming or incompetent subordinates has always been the autocrat’s chief burden. AI could lighten it, letting rulers watch their officials more closely without paying as much active attention.

In the near term, then, AI may greatly benefit autocracies. Despite the many obstacles to deployment, the technology is already bringing autocratic regimes the upsides of cheaper surveillance, smarter censorship, and fewer human subordinates to fear and distrust. But for autocratic rulers, the temptations of artificial intelligence may re-create the same trap they are seeking to escape. The more a regime depends on AI, the more it depends on the people who keep AI running. And those people, like every other praetorian class in history, will quickly discover what their indispensability is worth.

11:56

Colonoscopy Post-Mortem [Whatever]

First, so as not to bury the lede: It went great, there’s nothing in my colon they are the least bit concerned about, and I don’t have to come back for another colonoscopy for a decade, which I think is an optimal state of affairs.

Second, I’m 57 and really should have had a colonoscopy before this date, and I don’t really have any excuse for not having done so, other than laziness and procrastination. It took a one-two punch of a couple of close friends my age having (thankfully eminently treatable) cancer diagnoses to motivate me to get this thing done. My family doesn’t have a history of colon cancer, nor did I have anything physical that suggested I might have something to worry about in that area, but I’m at an age where shit happens (pun intended), and if it does, it’s best to have it dealt with as early as possible, especially down there. So I finally made the appointment.

I have to say that none of it was as unpleasant as I had been led to suggest. The day-before prep, which requires fasting and chugging a solution to clear out one’s bowels, was uniformly described to me as the worst part of the whole thing. Spoiler: It was, but in my case I didn’t find it all that horrible. My bowel-clearing solution was this gunk called Clenpiq, which was no taste treat (my bottles claimed to be “cranberry flavor,” which, well, no), but also wasn’t the very worst thing I ever drank, either. As I noted on Bluesky the other day, I’ve had energy drinks which tasted worse. It also was relatively small in volume (a single 8oz cup per dose, with two doses several hours apart), which is I understand a marked improvement from earlier times, when prep included drinking something on the order of a gallon of bowel-voiding stuff.

The Clenpiq was to be accompanied with several cups of other clear liquid; I chose Sprite and water for these. I wasn’t allowed to eat solid food at all during prep day, which I thought was going to be a real problem, but wasn’t. One, I ate more Jell-O on prep day than I think I ever had on any day in my life prior to that point, and while Jell-O isn’t exactly hearty, it kept my stomach from being entirely empty. Two, I think I psyched myself into not being all that hungry on prep day, especially since I knew everything I was putting into myself was going to be explosively voided later in the evening, and I didn’t want to make that part any more annoying (or gross) than it was already going to be.

Krissy has prepared for my evening. She has, truly, put the commode in accommodations.

— John Scalzi (@scalzi.com) 2026-10-06T21:27:59.610Z

And how was that part, the part where my bowels were explosively voided? Well, again, not a great time, and not an experience I’m in a rush to have again any time soon, but also not nearly as bad as some other people apparently experienced. The whole thing was like having pre-planned, well-managed diarrhea — I knew what was coming, I knew when it was coming, and I was able to plan for it when it happened. There were no surprises or accidents, I just headed to the bathroom when my body was telling me I should. The key here really was preparation.

(It also helped that a few years ago we got a fancy toilet with a bidet, which meant my ass ended up being less chapped than it might otherwise have been. Bidets are awesome, folks. Not just for colonoscopy prep, but also for colonoscopy prep.)

The worst time of the prep for me was getting up at 2am for a second bottle of Clenpiq and then staying up for the immediate aftermath. I had a couple mild episodes of nausea, in which it felt like I might need to vomit, but it turned out in both cases what I needed to do was clear out the other end instead. It was a weird and unpleasant correlation that I hope not to have to experience again, but once I figured out what was going on I could deal with it. None of this was great, but again, it was perfectly manageable. I even ended up getting a fair amount of sleep; more than six hours in total. I was very happy about that. Bluntly, I thought I would be spending the entire night shitting my brains out.

As for the colonoscopy itself: I don’t remember a single thing about it. We arrived at the hospital, they did my intake questions and prep, they wheeled me into the operating room, they put the propofol into my IV line, and the next thing I knew I was being wheeled out to a recovery room. A few minutes later I was dressed and Krissy and I were off to Culver’s to have an early lunch. We got to the hospital at 8:30, I went in for prep at nine, we were out of the door of the hospital just before eleven am. I was prepared to be groggy and mentally out of it for the rest of the day (there is a reason I excused myself from social media and the online world on Wednesday), but honestly by the time we got home before noon I was fine, if tired. I watched YouTube videos and took naps all afternoon. It was a perfectly nice way to spend the day.

Also, in case you were wondering: no residual soreness from the colonoscopy. As far as my conscious experience is concerned, I went to the hospital to have a really deep nap. I will tell you that prior to this procedure I had some mild anxiety about anesthesia because I’ve never had any before — I’ve never had a surgical procedure that required more than a local. My experience with this has alleviated those concerns. Turns out they do know what they’re doing.

All of which is to say, for those of you out there of an age with me, who still haven’t gotten a colonoscopy: They have this thing wired. The prep is not a fun time but it’s really not horrible, especially if you plan for it, and the procedure itself is, from an experiential point of view, literally nothing. And now I don’t have to worry about my colon for years. When one is in one’s mid-50s, having one less physical thing to worry about is a very comforting thought. If you’re in the US and your insurance covers it, get it scheduled (and everywhere else that doesn’t have to worry about the US’ miserable insurance scam, go straight to the “get it scheduled” part). It’ll be fine. You’ll be fine. It’s worth doing.

As a final note, there’s a reason that I’m clutching a teddy bear in my photo above. When I was in the OR for my colonoscopy, they had me prop myself up on my side and gave me an additional pillow to hold. The nurse told me that was my teddy bear and to give it a name, which I did, shortly before the lights went out. Apparently my first words to Krissy as I was wheeled into the recovery room was to ask for my teddy bear, which confused her but gave the nurses a chuckle. I don’t remember asking for the teddy bear, but later, when I could remember things, Krissy telling me that I did ask for it suggested a course of action.

So everyone, meet Aloysius the Colonoscopy Bear, who we picked up after lunch because, painless or not, I still deserved something for having my colonoscopy done. Aloysius was cheaper than a guitar, I’ll tell you that much. And cuter.

— JS

11:42

Build Your Own Post-training Pipeline [Radar]

This is the final post in a four-part series about post-training. If you missed them, check out part 1, part 2, and part 3.

Time to get your hands dirty! I’ll take you through implementing the key pieces of the classic ChatGPT pipeline: SFT, then reward model training, then PPO. The goal isn’t to reproduce InstructGPT, because that took a large team and thousands of GPU-hours. But getting hands-on will help make the concepts from this series concrete, so that when you look at each stage’s code, you understand what it’s doing to the model and why.

We’ll use Qwen2.5-1.5B as the base model. It’s small enough to train on a single node with a few GPUs but large enough that you can observe real behavioral changes from post-training.

For SFT, you’ll use torchtune, Meta’s PyTorch-native fine-tuning library. For RL, you’ll use verl (from ByteDance’s team), a production-grade RL post-training framework built on Ray. verl was designed from the ground up for distributed RL training with proper rollout orchestration, and it’s what you’d actually reach for if you were doing this at scale.

You’ll need a machine with at least 2 GPUs (4 or 8 is better) and around 80 GB of total GPU memory.

You’ll likely use an LLM to flesh out the boilerplate and get this running end to end. I used LLMs pointed to the recent docs to generate these. What matters as you read the code in this section is that you understand the config choices and data formats well enough to direct that process and debug when something goes wrong.

Stage 1: SFT on demonstrations

SFT is the easiest stage to implement. You’re taking the pretrained model and training it on {prompt, response} pairs using the same next-token prediction loss from pretraining, except you only compute loss on the response tokens.

Your SFT data should be in a conversational format. Here’s what a single example looks like:

{
    "messages": [
        {"role": "user", "content": "Why do people like golden retrievers?"},
        {"role": "assistant", "content": "Golden retrievers are one of the most 
popular dog breeds for good reason. They have a gentle, friendly temperament 
that makes them great family dogs. They're patient with kids and tend to get 
along well with other animals. They're also highly trainable and eager 
to please, which is why they're commonly used as service dogs and therapy dogs. 
And honestly, the goofy enthusiasm doesn't hurt either. They never really grow 
out of that puppy energy."}
    ]
}

Remember what a pretrained model does with “Why do people like golden retrievers?” It might spit out “Why do people like labrador retrievers?” because it’s just completing patterns. Your SFT data is what teaches it to actually answer the question instead.

In practice, you’d have thousands of these examples covering a range of tasks: question answering, summarization, creative writing, coding help, multiturn dialogue, and refusals for harmful requests. For this walkthrough, assume you have a JSONL file of these conversations.

torchtune uses YAML configs and built-in recipes. Here’s what a config might look like:

# sft_config.yaml

# Model
model:
  _component_: torchtune.models.qwen2_5.lora_qwen2_5_1_5b
  lora_attn_modules: ['q_proj', 'k_proj', 'v_proj', 
'output_proj']
  lora_rank: 64
  lora_alpha: 128

# Tokenizer
tokenizer:
  _component_: torchtune.models.qwen2_5.qwen2_5_tokenizer
  path: /path/to/Qwen2.5-1.5B/vocab.json
  merges_file: /path/to/Qwen2.5-1.5B/merges.txt
  max_seq_len: 2048

# Checkpointer — loads the pretrained weights
checkpointer:
  _component_: torchtune.training.FullModelHFCheckpointer
  checkpoint_dir: /path/to/Qwen2.5-1.5B
  output_dir: ./sft_checkpoint
  model_type: QWEN2

# Dataset
dataset:
  _component_: torchtune.datasets.chat_dataset
  source: sft_data.jsonl
  conversation_style: sharegpt
  max_seq_len: 2048
  train_on_input: false           # only compute loss on the 
                                    assistant's response tokens

# Training
seed: 42
epochs: 3
batch_size: 4
gradient_accumulation_steps: 4    # effective batch 
                                    size of 16
optimizer:
  _component_: torch.optim.AdamW
  lr: 2e-5
  weight_decay: 0.01
lr_scheduler:
  _component_: torchtune.training.lr_schedulers.get_cosine_schedule_with_warmup
  num_warmup_steps: 50

dtype: bf16
compile: false

Then launch it:

tune run lora_finetune_distributed --config 
sft_config.yaml

What actually matters in this config:

  • train_on_input: false masks the loss on prompt tokens so the model only learns to generate good responses, not to mimic user messages. If you accidentally set this to true, the model wastes capacity learning to produce prompts.
  • A learning rate of 2e-5 is the standard starting point for SFT. That’s aggressive enough to shift behavior in a few epochs but not so large that you destroy the pretrained weights.
  • Use LoRA instead of full fine-tuning. For a 1.5B model you could do either, but LoRA is the practical default because it’s faster, uses a lot less GPU memory, and at this model size the quality gap is negligible. At larger model sizes, LoRA becomes even more useful in saving compute.
  • 3 epochs because the dataset is small. InstructGPT trained for 16 epochs on ~13K examples. Smaller datasets need more passes, but watch validation loss for overfitting. This is something you should tune to see different results across different-sized datasets.

After this stage, try chatting with the model and try a bunch of different comparisons to the base model. Ask it “Why do people like golden retrievers?” and you should get a real answer now, not a list of related questions. The model should be able to hold a conversation and follow basic instructions. It’s already dramatically more useful than the base model, even if the responses aren’t always great.

Realistically, you should set up a good evaluation (“evals”) to assess the quality of the model, hyperparameter tune, and determine your data mix. In this section, you’ll just focus on looking at the code.

Stage 2: Training the reward model

For your reward model, start with your data of preference pairs, which will look like this:

{
    "prompt": "What's the capital of that country that celebrates with a lot 
of colored powders?",
    "chosen": "You're probably thinking of Holi, the festival where people 
throw bright colored powders. That celebration is most famously associated 
with India. The capital of India is New Delhi.",
    "rejected": "The capital of that country that celebrates with a lot of 
colored flowers is Amsterdam, the Netherlands, known for its tulip festivals."
}

The “rejected” response isn’t just wrong about the festival. It also misread “powders” as “flowers” and jumped to an incorrect answer.

For reward model training, you’ll use TRL’s RewardTrainer. Reward model training is a straightforward classification task.

from transformers import AutoModelForSequenceClassification, 
AutoTokenizer
from trl import RewardTrainer, RewardConfig
from datasets import load_dataset

# Start from the SFT checkpoint — it already understands 
the response distribution
model = AutoModelForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained(
    "./sft_checkpoint",
    num_labels=1,
    torch_dtype="bfloat16",
)
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("./sft_checkpoint")
tokenizer.pad_token = tokenizer.eos_token

dataset = load_dataset("json", 
data_files="preference_data.jsonl", split="train")

training_args = RewardConfig(
    output_dir="./reward_model",
    per_device_train_batch_size=8,
    num_train_epochs=1,    # just 1 epoch — reward models overfit fast
    learning_rate=1e-5,    # lower than SFT, be gentle
    bf16=True,
    max_length=2048,
    logging_steps=10,
    save_strategy="epoch",
)

trainer = RewardTrainer(
    model=model,
    args=training_args,
    train_dataset=dataset,
    tokenizer=tokenizer,
)

trainer.train()
trainer.save_model("./reward_model/final")

As you skim the code, take note of these three things:

  • Start from an SFT checkpoint, not a base model. The reward model needs to understand the distribution of responses it’ll be scoring, and the SFT model is closer to that distribution.
  • 1 epoch only. Reward models overfit quickly. The InstructGPT team found only 1 epoch was needed.
  • Learning rate of 1e-5, lower than SFT. Smaller updates.

After training, check the reward model by scoring a few responses manually. Give it a clearly good response and a clearly bad one for the same prompt and make sure the good one gets a higher score. If this basic test fails, something is wrong with your data or training. Don’t skip this step: It’s better to catch problems sooner than many GPU hours later!

Stage 3: PPO with verl

Now you can take the SFT model and optimize it against the reward model using PPO. verl handles the hard parts: coordinating rollout generation across workers, managing the four models that need to be in memory simultaneously (policy, reference, reward, critic), and orchestrating the update loop.

First, prepare your prompts. verl expects parquet format. Each row needs a prompt field containing the tokenized and chat-template-formatted prompt. Here’s an example of preparing it:

import pandas as pd
from transformers import AutoTokenizer
from datasets import load_dataset

tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("./sft_checkpoint")

raw_prompts = load_dataset("json", data_files="rl_prompts.jsonl", split="train")

def format_prompt(example):
    messages = [{"role": "user", "content": example["prompt"]}]
    formatted = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(
        messages, tokenize=False, add_generation_prompt=True
    )
    return {"prompt": formatted}

formatted = raw_prompts.map(format_prompt)
df = pd.DataFrame(formatted)
df.to_parquet("data/rl_prompts.parquet")

The prompts for RL don’t need labels. The reward model provides the signal. You just need a diverse set of prompts that covers the types of requests your model expects to see when you deploy it.

Next, define the reward function. verl lets you wrap your reward model in a function that takes a batch of prompts and responses and returns rewards:

# reward_fn.py — verl will call this during training
import torch
from transformers import AutoModelForSequenceClassification, AutoTokenizer

class RewardFunction:
    def __init__(self, reward_model_path="./reward_model/final"):
        self.model = AutoModelForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained(
            reward_model_path, torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16
        ).cuda().eval()
        self.tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(reward_model_path)
        self.tokenizer.pad_token = self.tokenizer.eos_token

    def __call__(self, prompts, responses):
        """
        prompts: list of prompt strings
        responses: list of response strings
        Returns: list of scalar rewards
        """
        texts = [p + r for p, r in zip(prompts, responses)]
        inputs = self.tokenizer(
            texts, return_tensors="pt", padding=True,
            truncation=True, max_length=2048
        ).to(self.model.device)
        with torch.no_grad():
            rewards = self.model(**inputs).logits.squeeze(-1)
        return rewards.tolist()

Now configure the PPO training run. verl uses YAML configuration files that specify the models, hyperparameters, and infrastructure:

# ppo_config.yaml
data:
  train_files: data/rl_prompts.parquet
  prompt_key: prompt
  max_prompt_length: 1024
  max_response_length: 1024

actor_rollout_ref:
  model:
    path: ./sft_checkpoint
  actor:
    optim:
      lr: 1e-6                    # very low — RL updates should be gentle
      lr_warmup_steps: 10
    ppo_mini_batch_size: 64
    ppo_micro_batch_size: 8       # adjust based on GPU memory
    ppo_epochs: 4                 # number of PPO update passes per batch
    clip_ratio: 0.2               # PPO clipping — standard value
    kl_penalty_coeff: 0.1         # KL penalty to prevent reward hacking
    entropy_coeff: 0.01           # small entropy bonus for exploration
  rollout:
    temperature: 0.7
    top_p: 0.9
    n: 1                          # 1 response per prompt per rollout
    tensor_model_parallel_size: 1
  ref:
    log_prob_micro_batch_size: 8

critic:
  model:
    path: ./reward_model/final    # initialize critic from reward model
  optim:
    lr: 1e-5
  ppo_micro_batch_size: 8

reward_model:
  path: ./reward_model/final
  micro_batch_size: 8

trainer:
  total_training_steps: 500
  save_freq: 100
  test_freq: 50
  project_name: post_training_walkthrough
  logger: wandb

A few important hyperparameters in the config:

  • The learning rate is an order of magnitude smaller than SFT, default at 1e-6. (“Actor” refers to the policy model.) RL updates are noisier, and you want to move slowly. If the model starts producing gibberish or repetitive text, your learning rate is probably too high.
  • The KL penalty coefficient is 0.1, and recall that it controls how much the model is penalized for drifting from the SFT checkpoint. 0.1 is a reasonable starting point, but you’ll likely need to adjust. If you see reward hacking, turn it up, but if the model doesn’t really change, you need to lower it.
  • The clip ratio is default set to 0.2, from the original PPO paper. This likely doesn’t need tuning. It prevents any single update from changing the policy too much.

Launch the training:

python -m verl.trainer.main_ppo \
    --config ppo_config.yaml \
    --n_gpus 4

During training, watch for a few things. The reward should generally trend upward, meaning the model is learning to produce responses the reward model likes. The KL divergence should increase but not explode, in which case the model is drifting too far and you need a higher KL penalty. And periodically generate some responses from the current checkpoint and read them yourself. Metrics can be unreliable on their own, and your own judgment of output quality can be more reliable. Of course, ideally, you have a held out evaluation set that you’re working with that can help you test different tasks you care about.

Putting it together

The full pipeline runs on stage after the next: SFT first, reward model second, PPO third. Each stage depends on the previous one. The SFT model provides the starting point for both RL training and the reward model. The reward model provides the signal for PPO. And PPO produces the final model.

This is, structurally, the same pipeline that produced InstructGPT and the first version of ChatGPT. The scale is obviously different. They used 175B parameter models, 40 labelers, and far more compute, but the mechanics are identical. Your 1.5B model won’t write poetry as well as the latest GPT, but it will go from producing “Why do people like labrador retrievers?” to actually answer “Why do people like golden retrievers?” with a conversational response. That’s post-training doing the heavy lifting.

If you’re doing this for real, what will eat most of your time isn’t the code but the data: curating good SFT demonstrations, collecting reliable preference labels, and building a prompt set for RL that covers the right distribution of tasks. But there are some great open source datasets out there that you can get started with.

The training infrastructure is largely solved: You can point an LLM at the torchtune and verl docs and have it scaffold a working pipeline for you in an afternoon. But no amount of tooling fixes bad data or a reward model that scores the wrong things highly. Understanding what each stage needs and why is what lets you direct that process effectively.

Grrl Power #1502 – Very demure, very distractible [Grrl Power]

I enjoy characters with emotive ears. Don’t be surprised if Sydney gets turned into a werefox at some point.

Okay, I probably won’t do that… Not permanently anyway.

It’s hard to get on the “secret” list once you’re on the usual list, but it’s possible, and nearly inevitable to be on both the secret and regular list at the same time. It’s about the order in which you are listed.

I don’t know if Sydney would have an extensive Celebrity Hall Pass list. She’s not above a little ogling and giggling with her friends over a cute boy, but she’s rarely overtly sexual. Most of her celebrity crushes are age inappropriate, but that’s because most of the media she consumed as a girl starred middle-aged actors. Her first exposure to Jerard Butler was formative. She enjoyed Tom Baker’s Doctor, but she was young enough when she was first exposed to Dr. Who that her fantasies just involved her being a companion and having space and time adventures. Guys that are 20+ years her senior.

That’s the range most of her list falls in, and if she ever met any of them IRL, she’d hopefully realize how much older most of them are, and would revise her list. Given that she has a comic shop with the clout to attract industry luminaries, it’s actually possible she’ll get to meet quite a few actors.


Oh, look who it is in the vote incentive. The NSFW version is finally up at Patreon. Plus a bonus pic.

I think she would get in trouble for doing this. She’d mess up the… floor of the waterfall? Is that what it’s called? The receiving pool? No, probably not that. Anyway, she’d churn things up and cause a ton of weird erosion.

Since you might be wondering, Niagara Falls is about 165 feet high, so Babezilla obviously doesn’t have to be full sized. I’d say she’s about 175-180 feet tall here?


Double res version will be posted over at Patreon. Feel free to contribute as much as you like.

11:07

Extending Guix [Planet GNU]

Guix is all about empowering people, so it should come as no surprise that one can extend it with new guix commands. You can show the commands available in your current Guix through the help command:

$ guix help

If you are using a recent Guix, there are a number of extensions at your disposal, they are available as individual packages, and as a meta-package providing a collection of extensions. Try them out with:

$ guix shell guix guile guix-extension-collection

I'm adding the guix and guile packages to the shell because we want the different Guile and Guix search paths to be adjusted in the shell. To know more about why this is needed, read Search Paths.

You will notice that the help menu has been extended with information about the available extensions:

$ guix help

...

  extension commands
    explore   interactively explore a Guix System configuration
    removals  keep up to date with package removals
    compose   docker compose compatibility layer
    toys      Explore packages and services through REST API
    xsearch   search for packages using a fast Xapian cache

...

Since this blog post is called "Extending Guix", let's write an extension, shall we?

How does Guix locate extensions?

Guix locates extensions by looking up GUIX_EXTENSIONS_PATH. Recently Guix has introduced a new way of writing extensions. The old way would search extensions under /path/to/guix/extensions and the extensions modules would be named (guix extensions NAME). The new schema expects extensions to be under /path/to/SCHEMA_VERSION; the name of the module will still be (guix extensions NAME).

The advantage of this new schema is the Guix can treat the extension module as a standard Guile module, meaning that the runtime is able to find the compiled .go file of the extension. The old schema was relaying on runtime evaluation; the load machinery was not handling compiled files. This has a considerable improvement on performance, so you are encouraged to update any old extension to the new schema.

Writing an extension

Enough introductions, let's write a basic extension.

The first step is to create the project structure. Remember that the extension machinery expects modules to be named (guix extensions NAME).

We start by creating, in our project root, the directories for the extension.

$ mkdir -p guix/extensions

Now, we create the file guix/extensions/hello.scm with the following contents:

(define-module (guix extensions hello))

A blank canvas...

We import (guix scripts) to get the define-command macro. We declare it and export it so the extension machinery can find the command in the public interface of the module.

(define-module (guix extensions hello)
  #:use-module (guix scripts)
  #:export (guix-hello))

(define-command (guix-hello . args)
  (category extension)
  (synopsis "say hello")
  (display "hello, I'm a Guix extension!\n"))

With this, we already have a working Guix extension. We can run the extension like this from the root of the project.

$ GUIX_EXTENSIONS_PATH=$PWD guix hello
hello, I'm a Guix extension!

Since we would like our extension to be discoverable by users, we will add a help message which will make the extension display in the guix help menu.

We will use (srfi srfi-37) to write the option parser, and (guix ui) for the internationalized strings; you will see that I import these modules when I show you the complete extension. Let's focus on the option definitions:

(define (show-help)
  (display (G_ "Usage: guix hello\n"))
  (display (G_ "Just say hello, it's not that complicated.\n"))
  (display (G_ "
      --help             display this message"))
  (newline))

(define %options
  (list (option '(#\h "help") #f #f
                (lambda args
                  (leave-on-EPIPE (show-help))
                  (exit 0)))))

Since we are only handling the arguments for showing the help message, we just need to call the parser at the start of the command:

(define-command (guix-hello . args)
  (category extension)
  (synopsis "say hello")
  (parse-command-line args %options (list '()))
  (display "hello, I'm a Guix extension!\n"))

Here you have the complete extension module:

(define-module (guix extensions hello)
  #:use-module (guix scripts)
  #:use-module (guix ui)
  #:use-module (srfi srfi-37)
  #:export (guix-hello))

(define (show-help)
  (display (G_ "Usage: guix hello\n"))
  (display (G_ "Just say hello, it's not that complicated.\n"))
  (display (G_ "
      --help             display this message"))
  (newline))

(define %options
  (list (option '(#\h "help") #f #f
                (lambda args
                  (leave-on-EPIPE (show-help))
                  (exit 0)))))

(define-command (guix-hello . args)
  (category extension)
  (synopsis "say hello")
  (parse-command-line args %options (list '()))
  (display "hello, I'm a Guix extension!\n"))

With that, our extension will be present when we ask Guix for help:

$ GUIX_EXTENSIONS_PATH=$PWD guix help

...

  extension commands
    hello  say hello

It also takes a --help flag:

$ GUIX_EXTENSIONS_PATH=$PWD guix hello --help
Usage: guix hello
Just say hello, it's not that complicated.

      --help             display this message

Packaging a Guix extension

At the time of writing, we don't have a dedicated Guix build-system for extensions. Fortunately, the guile-build-system is close enough for this use case.

Let's make a package definition for our new hello extension that uses our local sources. Create a guix.scm file at the root of the project with the following contents:

(use-modules (gnu packages package-management)
             (guix build-system guile)
             (guix gexp)
             (guix git-download)
             (guix packages)
             ((guix licenses) #:prefix license:))

(define vcs-file?
  ;; Return true if the given file is under version control.
  (or
   (git-predicate
    (dirname (canonicalize-path
              (assq-ref (current-source-location) 'filename))))
   (const #t)))

(define-public guix-hello
  (package
    (name "guix-hello")
    (version "0.0.0-git")
    (source (local-file (assume-valid-file-name ".")
                        "pin-checkout"
                        #:recursive? #t
                        #:select? vcs-file?))
    (build-system guile-build-system)
    (arguments
     (list
      #:scheme-file-regexp
      #~(lambda (file stat)
          (and ((file-name-predicate #$default-scheme-file-regexp)
                file stat)
               (not ((file-name-predicate "^(guix|channels|manifest)\\.scm$")
                     file stat))))
      #:phases
      #~(modify-phases %standard-phases
          (add-after 'build 'move-to-extension-directory
            (lambda _
              (with-directory-excursion #$output
                (mkdir-p "share/guix/extensions/1.5/guix/extensions")
                (rename-file (string-append "share/guile/site/"
                                            (target-guile-effective-version)
                                            "/guix/extensions/hello.scm")
                             "share/guix/extensions/1.5/guix/extensions/hello.scm")))))))
    (native-inputs (list guix))
    (inputs (list (lookup-package-input guix "guile")))
    (home-page "https://codeberg.org/guix-extensions")
    (synopsis "Make Guix say hello")
    (description
     "This extension provides the @command{guix hello} command,
which makes Guix say hello.")
    (license license:gpl3+)))

guix-hello

We can test this new extension like this:

$ guix shell -CW -f guix.scm -- guix hello

The flags passed to guix shell are the following:

  • -C (--container): To prevent your environment from interfering.
  • -W (--nesting): To bring the current Guix you are using into the container so it can load the extension.

Since this example is using the new extension scheme, the guix command you are running must be at or newer than commit de069958fc.

Closing words

I hope you find this small introduction to Guix extensions useful and that you start to write your own Guix extensions.

I would like to encourage everyone reading this to submit their extensions to the guix-extensions Codeberg organization. The idea is to make this organization a central hub for everyone to participate in the development of useful extensions for the community.

10:21

Our genie problem [Seth's Blog]

The djinn go back millennia, powerful and elusive creatures of the supernatural. They show up across time and culture.

Three hundred years ago, Charles Perrault retold a short story about a headstrong woodcutter and his wife. On being granted three wishes from Jupiter (archetype for the genie of legend), he accidentally blurts out that he’d like sausage for dinner. One wish, gone. His wife calls him a fool, and he responds by turning her nose into a sausage. Now, with just one wish left, he’s torn between being rich (but having a wife with a sausage attached to her nose) or using the third wish to end up right where he started.

Marital harmony and common sense prevail, and he ends up where he started, but filled with regret for what could have been. Ever since, we’ve been telling stories about people who screw up their wishes.

The persistence of genie morality in our culture is bigger than a Disney marketing ploy. It’s an important reminder about responsibility, long-term thinking and how often we fail to recognize how much agency we actually have. The three are woven into a narrative that often leaves us with a sausage attached to our noses.

In this moment, the biggest technology revolution humans have ever lived through, we’re all at risk of getting our wishes wrong. Careful what you wish for. But don’t forget to wish.

07:28

It Won’t Fly [George Monbiot]

Air travel is on track to account for almost all our emissions by 2050. So why aren’t we working to reduce demand?

By George Monbiot, published in the Guardian 3rd October 2026

If a third runway is built at Heathrow, what will be the impact on the wealth of the nation? It will cost us somewhere between £23.4bn and £62.5bn. These are not my figures; they weren’t calculated by environmental groups, but by the Department for Transport.

For decades, government ministers have told us that airport expansion is essential for “growth”. As chancellor, Rachel Reeves claimed that a third runway at Heathrow would add 0.43% to GDP, figures we later discovered came from a report commissioned by the airport. The transport department’s own analysis concluded that the real addition to GDP would be between 0.03% and 0.05%: eight to 14 times less. Against this, it weighed the social and environmental costs of the project, to reveal a massive net loss. It found that a third runway would cause major harm to the health and wellbeing of up to 3 million local people.

But even these figures don’t capture it. The climate breakdown caused by the runway affects the entire planet, yet the costs to other countries aren’t counted. So again we must ask, why does the government support it?

Or does it? Though Heathrow expansion remains official policy, when asked at the weekend, Andy Burnham said the runway was “contested” and “principally it’s a matter for London and London MPs”. That sounds hopeful.

We also learned that the project has been delayed yet again. Though Heathrow announced last year that its plans were “shovel-ready”, it now admits the runway would take four years longer to build than it claimed: the estimated completion date is now 2039.

By then, or so we must hope, a government might have decided to take the climate impact seriously. If so, the new runway would need to be shuttered the moment it opened. Otherwise, according to the government’s Climate Change Committee, “almost all CO2 emissions in 2050 will be from aviation”. Heathrow’s expansion alone, the committee says, would cause more carbon emissions by 2054 than “any other sector of the economy”.

And even this is not the end of it. The committee considers only the carbon dioxide planes produce, but the other impacts are even greater. A paper in the journal Atmospheric Environment suggests that, over 100 years, the nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, soot, volatile organic products, water vapour and other compounds released or formed in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere by planes raise the heating caused by flying by 115%. Over 20 years, they raise it by an astonishing 517%.

Given that crucial Earth systems may be approaching their tipping points, and heating today triggers further greenhouse gas releases from forests, wetlands and permafrost, the 20-year horizon is crucial. But these other compounds are considered in neither international treaties nor the UK’s Climate Change Act. The impact of flying is officially and massively underestimated.

While the heating effects of almost all other sectors can be greatly reduced by technology, there are simply no good solutions for aviation. Successive governments have justified airport expansion plans with the promise of “sustainable aviation fuel”. Mostly they mean turning biomass into kerosene, which is even worse than using fossil fuels. If this substitute is to reach any kind of scale, it will either swallow up existing cropland, driving starvation, or it will cause the expansion of cropland into forests, wetlands and other habitats, accelerating the environmental crisis. An analysis by the Royal Society found that meeting existing UK aviation demand (never mind future growth) with energy crops “would require around half of UK agricultural land”. That’s the opposite of sustainable.

“Sustainable aviation fuel” can also mean synthetic fuels made from captured CO2 and green hydrogen. But the Royal Society found that for existing aviation, we’d need to use between five and eight times the UK’s entire renewable electricity capacity. And still, aeroplanes would release a lethal chemical cocktail – not just CO2 but those other compounds – into the high atmosphere, so only a fraction of the problem would be solved. Worldwide, a paper in the journal One Earth found that even with a wildly unrealistic programme of technological change, in which fossil jet fuels were phased out completely by 2040, the global heating caused by aviation would more than double by 2070, thanks to rising demand.

As for hydrogen-, ammonia- or battery-powered commercial aircraft, they all fail on technical or safety grounds, even before we ask where the power comes from. The “prototypes” endlessly showcased by the airlines, which never get beyond the artist’s impression, are nothing but “perceptionware”, designed to solve political problems, not technical ones.

If Heathrow expansion goes ahead, passenger numbers in the UK are forecast to rise from 299 million in 2025 to 491 million in 2050. As other sectors decarbonise, the proportion of climate breakdown caused by flying climbs and climbs, until planes account for almost all of it.

The only effective strategy is to reduce demand. There’s a progressive means of doing so: the frequent flyer levy. Wealth and flights are strongly linked. In 2024, 48% of England’s population did not fly at all. But 5% of the population took five or more flights abroad, and these account for 33% of all journeys. Increasing demand has been almost entirely driven by frequent flyers, who are highly concentrated in the highest income quintile. The levy would not be charged on the first flight someone took in any year, but it would escalate with every additional flight.

This is just, proportionate and – unlike all the techno-bollocks – immediately dispatchable. Otherwise, we continue to subsidise a wealthy, selfish minority with our money, our health, our wellbeing and the degradation of the living planet. How is that fair?

What government support for airport expansion shows is that “growth” is simply an excuse for giving powerful lobby groups what they want. When asked whether growth was more important than net zero, Reeves replied: “Well, if it’s the No 1 mission, it’s obviously the most important thing.” That’s another way of saying money is more important than human life. But, as the figures show, it was never about growth at all. It was always about meeting the demands of the airport lobby and wealthy passengers.

Now we wait on Burnham. Will the flight of reason continue? Or will human and planetary welfare at last outweigh the lobbyists?

www.monbiot.com

Feeds

FeedRSSLast fetchedNext fetched after
@ASmartBear XML 22:21, Tuesday, 13 October 23:02, Tuesday, 13 October
a bag of four grapes XML 22:56, Tuesday, 13 October 23:38, Tuesday, 13 October
Ansible XML 22:21, Tuesday, 13 October 23:01, Tuesday, 13 October
Bad Science XML 22:42, Tuesday, 13 October 23:31, Tuesday, 13 October
Black Doggerel XML 22:21, Tuesday, 13 October 23:02, Tuesday, 13 October
Blog - Official site of Stephen Fry XML 22:42, Tuesday, 13 October 23:31, Tuesday, 13 October
Charlie Brooker | The Guardian XML 22:56, Tuesday, 13 October 23:38, Tuesday, 13 October
Charlie's Diary XML 22:28, Tuesday, 13 October 23:16, Tuesday, 13 October
Chasing the Sunset - Comics Only XML 22:42, Tuesday, 13 October 23:31, Tuesday, 13 October
Coding Horror XML 22:28, Tuesday, 13 October 23:15, Tuesday, 13 October
Comics Archive - Spinnyverse XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:33, Tuesday, 13 October
Cory Doctorow's craphound.com XML 22:56, Tuesday, 13 October 23:38, Tuesday, 13 October
Cory Doctorow, Author at Boing Boing XML 22:21, Tuesday, 13 October 23:02, Tuesday, 13 October
Ctrl+Alt+Del Comic XML 22:28, Tuesday, 13 October 23:16, Tuesday, 13 October
Cyberunions XML 22:42, Tuesday, 13 October 23:31, Tuesday, 13 October
David Mitchell | The Guardian XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:32, Tuesday, 13 October
Deeplinks XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:33, Tuesday, 13 October
Diesel Sweeties webcomic by rstevens XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:32, Tuesday, 13 October
Dilbert XML 22:42, Tuesday, 13 October 23:31, Tuesday, 13 October
Dork Tower XML 22:56, Tuesday, 13 October 23:38, Tuesday, 13 October
Economics from the Top Down XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:32, Tuesday, 13 October
Edmund Finney's Quest to Find the Meaning of Life XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:32, Tuesday, 13 October
EFF Action Center XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:32, Tuesday, 13 October
Enspiral Tales - Medium XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:34, Tuesday, 13 October
Events XML 22:28, Tuesday, 13 October 23:16, Tuesday, 13 October
Falkvinge on Liberty XML 22:28, Tuesday, 13 October 23:16, Tuesday, 13 October
Flipside XML 22:56, Tuesday, 13 October 23:38, Tuesday, 13 October
Flipside XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:34, Tuesday, 13 October
Free software jobs XML 22:21, Tuesday, 13 October 23:01, Tuesday, 13 October
Full Frontal Nerdity by Aaron Williams XML 22:28, Tuesday, 13 October 23:16, Tuesday, 13 October
General Protection Fault: Comic Updates XML 22:28, Tuesday, 13 October 23:16, Tuesday, 13 October
George Monbiot XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:32, Tuesday, 13 October
Girl Genius XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:32, Tuesday, 13 October
Groklaw XML 22:28, Tuesday, 13 October 23:16, Tuesday, 13 October
Grrl Power XML 22:56, Tuesday, 13 October 23:38, Tuesday, 13 October
Hackney Anarchist Group XML 22:42, Tuesday, 13 October 23:31, Tuesday, 13 October
Hackney Solidarity Network XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:34, Tuesday, 13 October
http://blog.llvm.org/feeds/posts/default XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:34, Tuesday, 13 October
http://calendar.google.com/calendar/feeds/q7s5o02sj8hcam52hutbcofoo4%40group.calendar.google.com/public/basic XML 22:21, Tuesday, 13 October 23:01, Tuesday, 13 October
http://dynamic.boingboing.net/cgi-bin/mt/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=feed&_type=posts&blog_id=1&id=1 XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:34, Tuesday, 13 October
http://eng.anarchoblogs.org/feed/atom/ XML 22:56, Tuesday, 13 October 23:42, Tuesday, 13 October
http://feed43.com/3874015735218037.xml XML 22:56, Tuesday, 13 October 23:42, Tuesday, 13 October
http://flatearthnews.net/flatearthnews.net/blogfeed XML 22:21, Tuesday, 13 October 23:02, Tuesday, 13 October
http://fulltextrssfeed.com/ XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:32, Tuesday, 13 October
http://london.indymedia.org/articles.rss XML 22:28, Tuesday, 13 October 23:15, Tuesday, 13 October
http://pipes.yahoo.com/pipes/pipe.run?_id=ad0530218c055aa302f7e0e84d5d6515&amp;_render=rss XML 22:56, Tuesday, 13 October 23:42, Tuesday, 13 October
http://planet.gridpp.ac.uk/atom.xml XML 22:28, Tuesday, 13 October 23:15, Tuesday, 13 October
http://shirky.com/weblog/feed/atom/ XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:33, Tuesday, 13 October
http://thecommune.co.uk/feed/ XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:34, Tuesday, 13 October
http://theness.com/roguesgallery/feed/ XML 22:28, Tuesday, 13 October 23:16, Tuesday, 13 October
http://www.airshipentertainment.com/buck/buckcomic/buck.rss XML 22:42, Tuesday, 13 October 23:31, Tuesday, 13 October
http://www.airshipentertainment.com/growf/growfcomic/growf.rss XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:33, Tuesday, 13 October
http://www.airshipentertainment.com/myth/mythcomic/myth.rss XML 22:56, Tuesday, 13 October 23:38, Tuesday, 13 October
http://www.feedsapi.com/makefulltextfeed.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.somethingpositive.net%2Fsp.xml&what=auto&key=&max=7&links=preserve&exc=&privacy=I+accept XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:33, Tuesday, 13 October
http://www.godhatesastronauts.com/feed/ XML 22:28, Tuesday, 13 October 23:16, Tuesday, 13 October
http://www.tinycat.co.uk/feed/ XML 22:21, Tuesday, 13 October 23:01, Tuesday, 13 October
https://anarchism.pageabode.com/blogs/anarcho/feed/ XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:33, Tuesday, 13 October
https://broodhollow.krisstraub.comfeed/ XML 22:21, Tuesday, 13 October 23:02, Tuesday, 13 October
https://debian-administration.org/atom.xml XML 22:21, Tuesday, 13 October 23:02, Tuesday, 13 October
https://elitetheatre.org/ XML 22:28, Tuesday, 13 October 23:15, Tuesday, 13 October
https://feeds.feedburner.com/Starslip XML 22:56, Tuesday, 13 October 23:38, Tuesday, 13 October
https://feeds2.feedburner.com/GeekEtiquette?format=xml XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:32, Tuesday, 13 October
https://hackbloc.org/rss.xml XML 22:21, Tuesday, 13 October 23:02, Tuesday, 13 October
https://kajafoglio.livejournal.com/data/atom/ XML 22:42, Tuesday, 13 October 23:31, Tuesday, 13 October
https://philfoglio.livejournal.com/data/atom/ XML 22:28, Tuesday, 13 October 23:15, Tuesday, 13 October
https://pixietrixcomix.com/eerie-cutiescomic.rss XML 22:28, Tuesday, 13 October 23:15, Tuesday, 13 October
https://pixietrixcomix.com/menage-a-3/comic.rss XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:33, Tuesday, 13 October
https://propertyistheft.wordpress.com/feed/ XML 22:21, Tuesday, 13 October 23:01, Tuesday, 13 October
https://requiem.seraph-inn.com/updates.rss XML 22:21, Tuesday, 13 October 23:01, Tuesday, 13 October
https://studiofoglio.livejournal.com/data/atom/ XML 22:56, Tuesday, 13 October 23:42, Tuesday, 13 October
https://thecommandline.net/feed/ XML 22:56, Tuesday, 13 October 23:42, Tuesday, 13 October
https://torrentfreak.com/subscriptions/ XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:32, Tuesday, 13 October
https://web.randi.org/?format=feed&type=rss XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:32, Tuesday, 13 October
https://www.baen.com/baenebooks XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:33, Tuesday, 13 October
https://www.dcscience.net/feed/medium.co XML 22:42, Tuesday, 13 October 23:31, Tuesday, 13 October
https://www.DropCatch.com/domain/steampunkmagazine.com XML 22:21, Tuesday, 13 October 23:02, Tuesday, 13 October
https://www.DropCatch.com/domain/ubuntuweblogs.org XML 22:56, Tuesday, 13 October 23:42, Tuesday, 13 October
https://www.DropCatch.com/redirect/?domain=DyingAlone.net XML 22:28, Tuesday, 13 October 23:15, Tuesday, 13 October
https://www.freedompress.org.uk:443/news/feed/ XML 22:28, Tuesday, 13 October 23:16, Tuesday, 13 October
https://www.goblinscomic.com/category/comics/feed/ XML 22:21, Tuesday, 13 October 23:01, Tuesday, 13 October
https://www.loomio.com/blog/feed/ XML 22:56, Tuesday, 13 October 23:42, Tuesday, 13 October
https://www.newstatesman.com/feeds/blogs/laurie-penny.rss XML 22:21, Tuesday, 13 October 23:02, Tuesday, 13 October
https://www.patreon.com/graveyardgreg/posts/comic.rss XML 22:28, Tuesday, 13 October 23:15, Tuesday, 13 October
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/rss/property-for-sale/find.html?locationIdentifier=REGION^876&maxPrice=240000&minBedrooms=2&displayPropertyType=houses&oldDisplayPropertyType=houses&primaryDisplayPropertyType=houses&oldPrimaryDisplayPropertyType=houses&numberOfPropertiesPerPage=24 XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:32, Tuesday, 13 October
https://x.com/statuses/user_timeline/22724360.rss XML 22:21, Tuesday, 13 October 23:01, Tuesday, 13 October
Humble Bundle Blog XML 22:28, Tuesday, 13 October 23:15, Tuesday, 13 October
I, Cringely XML 22:28, Tuesday, 13 October 23:16, Tuesday, 13 October
Irregular Webcomic! XML 22:21, Tuesday, 13 October 23:02, Tuesday, 13 October
Joel on Software XML 22:56, Tuesday, 13 October 23:42, Tuesday, 13 October
Judith Proctor's Journal XML 22:21, Tuesday, 13 October 23:01, Tuesday, 13 October
Krebs on Security XML 22:21, Tuesday, 13 October 23:02, Tuesday, 13 October
Lambda the Ultimate - Programming Languages Weblog XML 22:21, Tuesday, 13 October 23:01, Tuesday, 13 October
Looking For Group XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:33, Tuesday, 13 October
LWN.net XML 22:21, Tuesday, 13 October 23:02, Tuesday, 13 October
Mimi and Eunice XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:34, Tuesday, 13 October
Neil Gaiman's Journal XML 22:21, Tuesday, 13 October 23:01, Tuesday, 13 October
Nina Paley XML 22:28, Tuesday, 13 October 23:15, Tuesday, 13 October
O Abnormal – Scifi/Fantasy Artist XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:34, Tuesday, 13 October
Oglaf! -- Comics. Often dirty. XML 22:28, Tuesday, 13 October 23:16, Tuesday, 13 October
Oh Joy Sex Toy XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:33, Tuesday, 13 October
Order of the Stick XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:33, Tuesday, 13 October
Original Fiction Archives - Reactor XML 22:56, Tuesday, 13 October 23:38, Tuesday, 13 October
OSnews XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:34, Tuesday, 13 October
Paul Graham: Unofficial RSS Feed XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:34, Tuesday, 13 October
Penny Arcade XML 22:56, Tuesday, 13 October 23:38, Tuesday, 13 October
Penny Red XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:34, Tuesday, 13 October
PHD Comics XML 22:42, Tuesday, 13 October 23:31, Tuesday, 13 October
Phil's blog XML 22:28, Tuesday, 13 October 23:16, Tuesday, 13 October
Planet Debian XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:34, Tuesday, 13 October
Planet GNU XML 22:21, Tuesday, 13 October 23:02, Tuesday, 13 October
Planet Lisp XML 22:42, Tuesday, 13 October 23:31, Tuesday, 13 October
Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow XML 22:21, Tuesday, 13 October 23:01, Tuesday, 13 October
PS238 by Aaron Williams XML 22:28, Tuesday, 13 October 23:16, Tuesday, 13 October
QC RSS v2 XML 22:28, Tuesday, 13 October 23:15, Tuesday, 13 October
Radar XML 22:56, Tuesday, 13 October 23:38, Tuesday, 13 October
RevK®'s ramblings XML 22:56, Tuesday, 13 October 23:42, Tuesday, 13 October
Richard Stallman's Political Notes XML 22:42, Tuesday, 13 October 23:31, Tuesday, 13 October
Scenes From A Multiverse XML 22:28, Tuesday, 13 October 23:15, Tuesday, 13 October
Schneier on Security XML 22:21, Tuesday, 13 October 23:01, Tuesday, 13 October
SCHNEWS.ORG.UK XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:33, Tuesday, 13 October
Scripting News XML 22:56, Tuesday, 13 October 23:38, Tuesday, 13 October
Seth's Blog XML 22:56, Tuesday, 13 October 23:42, Tuesday, 13 October
Skin Horse XML 22:56, Tuesday, 13 October 23:38, Tuesday, 13 October
Tales From the Riverbank XML 22:42, Tuesday, 13 October 23:31, Tuesday, 13 October
The Adventures of Dr. McNinja XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:34, Tuesday, 13 October
The Bumpycat sat on the mat XML 22:21, Tuesday, 13 October 23:01, Tuesday, 13 October
The Daily WTF XML 22:56, Tuesday, 13 October 23:42, Tuesday, 13 October
The Monochrome Mob XML 22:21, Tuesday, 13 October 23:02, Tuesday, 13 October
The Non-Adventures of Wonderella XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:32, Tuesday, 13 October
The Old New Thing XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:33, Tuesday, 13 October
The Open Source Grid Engine Blog XML 22:28, Tuesday, 13 October 23:15, Tuesday, 13 October
The Stranger XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:34, Tuesday, 13 October
towerhamletsalarm XML 22:56, Tuesday, 13 October 23:42, Tuesday, 13 October
Twokinds XML 22:56, Tuesday, 13 October 23:38, Tuesday, 13 October
UK Indymedia Features XML 22:56, Tuesday, 13 October 23:38, Tuesday, 13 October
Uploads from ne11y XML 22:56, Tuesday, 13 October 23:42, Tuesday, 13 October
Uploads from piasladic XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:32, Tuesday, 13 October
Use Sword on Monster XML 22:28, Tuesday, 13 October 23:15, Tuesday, 13 October
Wayward Sons: Legends - Sci-Fi Full Page Webcomic - Updates Daily XML 22:56, Tuesday, 13 October 23:42, Tuesday, 13 October
what if? XML 22:21, Tuesday, 13 October 23:02, Tuesday, 13 October
Whatever XML 22:42, Tuesday, 13 October 23:31, Tuesday, 13 October
Whitechapel Anarchist Group XML 22:42, Tuesday, 13 October 23:31, Tuesday, 13 October
WIL WHEATON dot NET XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:33, Tuesday, 13 October
wish XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:34, Tuesday, 13 October
Writing the Bright Fantastic XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:33, Tuesday, 13 October
xkcd.com XML 22:49, Tuesday, 13 October 23:32, Tuesday, 13 October